Free Practice Questions for FINRA SIE Exam

Variable annuities typically include surrender charges (surrender fees), especially during the early years of the contract. A surrender charge is a fee assessed if the owner withdraws funds above permitted free-withdrawal amounts or terminates the contract during a specified surrender period. This feature is common because variable annuities are insurance products that often involve significant distribution costs, and insurers structure surrender schedules to recoup those costs if the investor exits early. On the SIE, variable annuities are treated as packaged products/variable contracts with unique fee structures, including surrender charges and separate account expenses.

By contrast, no-load mutual funds are designed specifically to have no sales charge (no front-end load and typically no deferred sales charge), though they may still have operating expenses in the expense ratio. UITs may involve sales charges at purchase, and they have a fixed portfolio that does not actively trade; they are not commonly characterized by surrender fees in the way variable annuities are. ETFs trade intraday on an exchange like stocks, and investors generally pay brokerage commissions and incur bid-ask spreads (and internal fund expenses), but ETFs do not impose surrender fees as an inherent product feature for secondary-market trades.

The concept being tested is recognition of product-specific fees. Variable annuities commonly include multiple layers of cost: mortality and expense (M&E) charges, administrative fees, underlying subaccount expenses, and surrender charges. Surrender charges are a key distinguishing characteristic and a frequent exam point because they affect liquidity and time horizon suitability.

A lien against a registered person is a reportable financial event that must be disclosed on the individual’s registration record. The mechanism for updating that record is an amended Form U4, and firms are required to update Form U4 disclosures promptly (commonly tested as within 30 days after the firm learns of the event). Therefore, the correct answer is A. Form U4 is the Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration or Transfer and is used not only for initial registration but also for ongoing updates to disclosure items, including certain financial matters such as liens, judgments, and bankruptcies when required.

Choice B is incorrect because Form BD is the broker-dealer’s registration form (the firm’s registration), used for firm-level changes and disclosures. A lien filed against an individual RR is not handled by updating the broker-dealer’s Form BD. Choice C is incorrect because fingerprinting requirements relate to identity/background checks and are not the reporting mechanism for financial liens. Choice D is incorrect because FINRA Rule 4530 generally concerns reporting of certain events such as regulatory actions, violations, and specified misconduct; a personal lien is addressed through the representative’s disclosure updates rather than being a “customer complaint report” filing. (Also, the question’s “complaint report” phrasing is a distractor—liens are not customer complaints.)

On the SIE, the point is recognizing where disclosures live (Form U4 for associated persons) and the expectation that firms supervise and update registration records when reportable events occur.

This situation is best classified as political risk, specifically regulatory risk, because the stock’s decline is driven by the anticipated impact of government action—pending regulations—on the company’s future profitability. Political risk includes changes in laws, rules, regulatory enforcement, tax policy, or other governmental decisions that can alter an issuer’s operating environment. When a company expects higher compliance costs, investors may reduce expected earnings or cash flow projections, which commonly leads to a lower valuation and therefore a lower stock price. That cause-and-effect relationship—government-driven change leading to a market value adjustment—is the core idea of political risk.

It is not credit risk, which focuses on whether a debt issuer can meet interest and principal payments. Stockholders are affected by equity value changes, and the prompt does not indicate an increased likelihood of default or missed payments on debt. It is not liquidity risk, which concerns the ability to sell the stock quickly at a fair price without significantly moving the market; the question does not mention thin trading, wide bid-ask spreads, or difficulty finding buyers. While capital (principal) risk broadly applies to most equity investments because market prices can decline, the question is asking for the specific type of risk causing the decline. Here, the driver is regulatory costs from pending government rules, which points directly to political risk.

This aligns with the SIE focus on identifying risk types and recognizing how external forces—especially governmental or regulatory developments—can affect securities markets and issuer valuations.

Step by Step Explanation:

Call Provision: This allows the issuer to redeem bonds before their maturity date, usually at a premium to the par value, which benefits the issuer in a declining interest rate environment.

Put Provision: Allows bondholders, not issuers, to sell the bond back to the issuer.

Conversion: Relates to convertible bonds that can be converted into equity.

Defeasement: Refers to the removal of a bond issuer’s obligation by setting aside cash or securities to cover the debt.

SEC Guide on Callable Bonds: SEC Callable Bonds.

Step by Step Explanation:

Publicly Traded Limited Partnerships (PTPs): Represent ownership stakes, which categorize them as equity securities. PTPs often involve sectors like real estate or energy.

Incorrect Options:

A: Mutual funds are pooled investment vehicles, not partnerships.

C: Fixed-income securities are debt instruments like bonds.

D: Derivatives include options or futures, not ownership stakes.

SEC Guidance on Publicly Traded Partnerships: SEC PTPs.

An option is at the money (ATM) when the current value of the underlying (here, the index level) is equal to the option’s strike price. That definition matches the question exactly, making B correct. ATM status is one of the core “moneyness” classifications tested on the SIE along with in the money (ITM) and out of the money (OTM).

For a call option, the option is ITM when the underlying index level is above the strike price (because exercising would allow purchase at the strike below the market), and OTM when the index level is below the strike. For a put option, it’s the reverse: ITM when the underlying is below the strike, and OTM when the underlying is above the strike. When the index level equals the strike, neither a call nor a put has intrinsic value based on immediate exercise, so it is ATM.

Choice A and C are incorrect because “in” and “out of the money” require the underlying to be above or below the strike, not equal. Choice D is incorrect because an option trading at “intrinsic value only” implies it has no time value and is priced exactly at intrinsic value. But ATM options have zero intrinsic value by definition; their premium (if any) is typically all time value, reflecting volatility and time remaining until expiration.

This question reinforces the SIE’s options fundamentals: strike price, premium, intrinsic vs time value, and how moneyness is determined using the underlying level relative to the strike.

If the investor’s only goal is to minimize taxes from a sale, they generally want to realize the smallest taxable capital gain (or potentially realize a loss). Cost basis is central: capital gain = sale proceeds − cost basis. A higher cost basis means less gain (or a greater chance of a loss) for the same sale amount, leading to lower taxable impact. Therefore, redeeming $1,000 from Fund A (high cost basis) is the best strategy, making A correct.

Redeeming $1,000 of Fund B (low cost basis) would typically produce a larger capital gain because the investor paid less (basis is lower) relative to current value. That larger gain increases taxable income (assuming the shares are held in a taxable account and not offset by losses). Splitting the redemption between A and B (choice C) would likely create more gain than redeeming solely from the higher-basis fund, so it is not optimal for tax minimization if a single-fund redemption is possible.

Choice D is imprecise and potentially misleading. “Higher profit” informally means larger unrealized gain, which would generally produce more taxable gain, not less. The tax-minimizing approach focuses on tax lot selection and selling shares with the highest basis (or lowest gain) when the objective is to minimize taxes, subject to the investor’s holding period (long-term vs short-term rates) and specific cost basis method used.

This is a core SIE taxable-account concept: when choosing which holdings to sell, investors can manage taxes by selecting higher-basis positions (or specific lots) to reduce realized gains.