Free Practice Questions for FINRA SIE Exam

A preliminary prospectus, commonly called a red herring, contains important information about the issuer and the proposed offering, but it does not include the final offering price. It typically includes business information, risk factors, use of proceeds, management information, capitalization, financial information, and ownership structure. Choice B is correct. Choice A is incorrect because the final offering price is not included until the final prospectus after effectiveness and pricing. Choice C is incorrect because anticipated trading volume is not a required or reliable disclosure item in a preliminary prospectus. Choice D is incorrect because regulators do not approve the merits of securities offerings. Any implication that FINRA or the SEC has approved the investment merits of an offering is prohibited. The SIE outline covers offering documents and delivery requirements, public offerings, initial public offerings, SEC filing requirements, and unlawful representations. The preliminary prospectus is a disclosure document, not a sales guarantee or regulatory endorsement. Its purpose is to provide material information while the registration process is pending. Reference: Knowledge of Capital Markets; Offerings; IPOs; Prospectus; Securities Act Disclosure Rules.

Preferred stock may include convertible features that allow holders to exchange the preferred shares for another security of the issuing company—most commonly common stock—at a specified conversion ratio. That is why choice B is correct. Convertible preferred combines characteristics of equity income (a stated dividend) with the potential upside participation of common stock through the conversion privilege. The conversion feature is set by the issuer and described in the security’s terms at issuance.

Choice A is not the best answer because “common stock” itself is not typically described as “convertible” into other company issues; conversion features are commonly attached to preferred stock or bonds (convertible debentures), not standard common shares. Choice C, commercial paper, is a short-term unsecured corporate money market instrument; it is not typically issued with conversion features—its hallmark is short maturity and credit quality, not embedded equity options. Choice D, an ETF, is an investment company product whose shares represent an interest in a portfolio; ETFs are not typically “convertible” into other issues of the company in the way convertible preferred is.

This is a product-knowledge question aimed at understanding embedded features and how issuers structure securities. For SIE purposes, remember: convertibility is most commonly associated with preferred stock and certain corporate bonds, and it provides investors with an option-like feature that can change the security’s risk/return profile (income plus potential appreciation).

This scenario describes a covered call: the investor owns the underlying stock (long 100 shares) and has sold (written) a call option against it. A call option gives its holder the right to buy the stock at the strike price ($50) before expiration. On expiration day, the key question is whether the option is in the money (stock price above strike) or out of the money (stock price below strike). If XYZ closes at $45, the call option with a $50 strike is out of the money because exercising the right to buy at $50 makes no economic sense when the market price is $45. As a result, the call will typically expire worthless, and the writer keeps the premium collected. The investor remains long the original 100 shares, which is exactly choice B.

Choice A is incorrect because assignment/exercise is most likely when the option is in the money at expiration (and sometimes slightly in the money intraday), not when it is out of the money. Choice C is incorrect because standard listed equity options do not create a “margin call on the expiring contract” simply because they expire; margin requirements are about risk exposure while positions are open, and here the position is covered by stock ownership. Choice D is incorrect because a call option expiring out of the money does not deliver shares to the writer; it simply expires and disappears.

This tests core SIE options mechanics: moneyness, expiration outcomes, assignment likelihood, and covered vs. uncovered risk.

Step by Step Explanation:

Breakeven Calculation: For covered call writing, breakeven is the stock purchase price minus the premium received.

Purchase Price = $50

Premium Received = $8

Breakeven = $50 - $8 = $42.

Other Options:

B, C, and D: Incorrect because they do not reflect the proper calculation of stock price minus the premium.

Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) Education: OCC Options Guidance.

Step by Step Explanation:

FINRA Rule 1122: Requires that registered representatives update their residential address with FINRA for two years post-termination.

Purpose: This ensures accurate records for potential regulatory inquiries during the statutory two-year period when a terminated individual remains subject to FINRA’s jurisdiction.

FINRA Rule 1122 (Filing False or Misleading Information): FINRA Rule 1122.

Variable annuities typically include surrender charges (surrender fees), especially during the early years of the contract. A surrender charge is a fee assessed if the owner withdraws funds above permitted free-withdrawal amounts or terminates the contract during a specified surrender period. This feature is common because variable annuities are insurance products that often involve significant distribution costs, and insurers structure surrender schedules to recoup those costs if the investor exits early. On the SIE, variable annuities are treated as packaged products/variable contracts with unique fee structures, including surrender charges and separate account expenses.

By contrast, no-load mutual funds are designed specifically to have no sales charge (no front-end load and typically no deferred sales charge), though they may still have operating expenses in the expense ratio. UITs may involve sales charges at purchase, and they have a fixed portfolio that does not actively trade; they are not commonly characterized by surrender fees in the way variable annuities are. ETFs trade intraday on an exchange like stocks, and investors generally pay brokerage commissions and incur bid-ask spreads (and internal fund expenses), but ETFs do not impose surrender fees as an inherent product feature for secondary-market trades.

The concept being tested is recognition of product-specific fees. Variable annuities commonly include multiple layers of cost: mortality and expense (M & E) charges, administrative fees, underlying subaccount expenses, and surrender charges. Surrender charges are a key distinguishing characteristic and a frequent exam point because they affect liquidity and time horizon suitability.

The correct answer is A, The customer is the RR’s sister. Under FINRA rules (Rule 3240), borrowing from or lending to customers is generally prohibited, unless specific exceptions apply and firm approval is obtained. One key exception is when the customer is an immediate family member, which includes relationships such as parents, children, siblings, and spouses.

In this scenario, since the customer is the RR’s sister, the borrowing may be permitted, provided the firm’s policies allow it and proper written approval is obtained. This type of relationship reduces the risk of exploitation or conflict of interest that the rule is designed to prevent.

Choice B, coworker, is incorrect because simply working together does not qualify as an exception under FINRA rules. Choice C, a letter of instruction, is also incorrect because written permission from the customer alone does not override regulatory restrictions—firm approval and qualifying conditions are required.

Choice D is incorrect because while borrowing is generally restricted, it is not absolutely prohibited in all cases—there are limited exceptions, such as immediate family relationships.

Thus, borrowing is permissible in this case due to the familial relationship, making choice A correct.

A customer confirmation must disclose whether the broker-dealer acted as principal or agent in the transaction. Trade capacity is a key disclosure because it tells the customer whether the firm executed the trade from or for its own account, or whether it acted as an intermediary for the customer. Choice C is correct. If the firm acts as agent, it generally charges a commission. If it acts as principal, it buys from or sells to the customer and may earn a markup or markdown. Choice A is incorrect because the daily trading price range is not a standard required confirmation disclosure. Choice B is incorrect because total trading volume for the security is not required on the customer confirmation. Choice D is incorrect because representative-specific compensation is not the general required confirmation disclosure stated in this question. The SIE outline includes customer confirmations, trade capacity, principal versus agency trading, commissions, markups, and books and records requirements. It also lists SEC Rule 10b-10 and FINRA Rule 2232 on customer confirmations. Reference: Section 3.1.1 Orders and Strategies; Section 3.2.4 Books and Records; SEC Rule 10b-10; FINRA Rule 2232.

The correct answer is B, Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This Act specifically regulates individuals and firms that provide investment advice for compensation, making it directly applicable to the scenario described in the question.

Step-by-step, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 requires investment advisers to register with the SEC or state regulators, depending on their assets under management. It also imposes fiduciary duties, meaning advisers must act in the best interests of their clients, provide full disclosure of conflicts of interest, and adhere to anti-fraud provisions.

Choice A, the Securities Act of 1933, focuses on the initial issuance of securities, requiring registration of new securities offerings and full disclosure to investors. It does not regulate investment advisers. Choice C, the Investment Company Act of 1940, governs investment companies such as mutual funds, not individuals providing advice. Choice D, the Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, primarily enhanced the regulatory framework of markets and expanded the authority of the SEC, but did not establish adviser registration requirements.

Therefore, the law that directly addresses registration and regulation of investment advisers receiving compensation is the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Step by Step Explanation:

FINRA Rule 3210: Requires registered representatives to obtain written consent from their employing broker-dealer before opening accounts at other financial institutions if securities transactions will occur.

Incorrect Options:

A, B, and C: These accounts are exempt because they do not involve direct securities transactions requiring monitoring.

FINRA Rule 3210 (Accounts at Other Institutions): FINRA Rule 3210.