Free Practice Questions for FINRA SIE Exam

A balance sheet provides a snapshot of a company’s financial position at a specific point in time by showing what the company owns and owes, and the residual value attributable to owners. The core balance sheet equation is Assets = Liabilities + Shareholders’ Equity. That is why the best description among the choices is “assets, debts, and the amount invested in the company”—assets correspond to resources owned, debts correspond to liabilities owed, and the “amount invested” corresponds to equity (often including paid-in capital and retained earnings). This aligns with how fundamental analysis uses financial statements to evaluate issuer health, leverage, and capitalization.

Choice A (revenues and expenses) describes an income statement, which measures operating performance over a period of time (e.g., a quarter or a year), not a point-in-time snapshot. Choice B is misleading: while a balance sheet is indeed “at a specific point in time,” it does not show “earnings” at a point in time. Earnings are generated over a period and appear on the income statement; the balance sheet may reflect accumulated earnings through retained earnings, but it is not an earnings statement. Choice C is incorrect because the balance sheet does not include the “number of investors” as a standard line item. Public companies disclose shares outstanding elsewhere, but investor count is not a balance sheet category.

For SIE purposes, the key is recognizing which statement answers which question: balance sheet = financial position (assets, liabilities, equity), income statement = profitability (revenue, expenses, net income), and cash flow statement = sources/uses of cash.

This scenario describes a covered call: the investor owns the underlying stock (long 100 shares) and has sold (written) a call option against it. A call option gives its holder the right to buy the stock at the strike price ($50) before expiration. On expiration day, the key question is whether the option is in the money (stock price above strike) or out of the money (stock price below strike). If XYZ closes at $45, the call option with a $50 strike is out of the money because exercising the right to buy at $50 makes no economic sense when the market price is $45. As a result, the call will typically expire worthless, and the writer keeps the premium collected. The investor remains long the original 100 shares, which is exactly choice B.

Choice A is incorrect because assignment/exercise is most likely when the option is in the money at expiration (and sometimes slightly in the money intraday), not when it is out of the money. Choice C is incorrect because standard listed equity options do not create a “margin call on the expiring contract” simply because they expire; margin requirements are about risk exposure while positions are open, and here the position is covered by stock ownership. Choice D is incorrect because a call option expiring out of the money does not deliver shares to the writer; it simply expires and disappears.

This tests core SIE options mechanics: moneyness, expiration outcomes, assignment likelihood, and covered vs. uncovered risk.

Comparative performance statistics—especially across competing mutual funds—are most commonly obtained from independent fund rating services, making C correct. These services compile standardized fund performance data, risk metrics, category comparisons, peer rankings, and sometimes risk-adjusted measures, allowing investors to compare funds across managers and fund families. Because they are designed specifically for cross-fund comparisons, they are the best source among the choices.

A fund’s prospectus (choice A) contains important disclosures about that specific fund—objectives, strategies, risks, fees, and past performance—but it is not primarily a comparative document across multiple competing funds. Shareholder reports (choice B) provide periodic information about a specific fund (financial statements, portfolio holdings summaries, management discussion), and while they include performance figures, they typically do not provide broad comparisons of “competing mutual funds.” The statement of additional information (choice D) supplements the prospectus with expanded technical details about that particular fund; it is not meant to be a comparative performance source across the market.

For SIE purposes, recognize the roles of fund documents: prospectus/SAI/shareholder reports are issuer-specific disclosure documents, while independent rating services are built for industry-wide comparisons. This distinction helps you answer questions about where an investor would go for peer group performance, ranking, and objective comparative data rather than reading each fund’s disclosures individually.

The annual interest on a bond is calculated based on the coupon rate and the bond’s par value.

Coupon rate = 4.0%.

Annual interest = $10,000 (par value) × 4.0% = $400.

A is correct because the coupon rate determines the annual interest.

B, C, and D are incorrect because they reflect incorrect calculations. The current yield, YTM, and tax-equivalent yield do not affect the bond’s fixed coupon payments.

A call option is considered covered when the seller (writer) owns the underlying security in sufficient quantity to meet the delivery obligation if the option is exercised. In listed equity options, one options contract typically represents 100 shares of the underlying stock. Here, the investor owns 200 shares of ABC stock. That means the investor can cover two call contracts (2 × 100 shares = 200 shares). Since the investor sold four calls, only two of them are covered; the remaining two calls are uncovered (naked). Therefore, the correct answer is C.

This question tests a fundamental options concept that is heavily emphasized on the SIE: understanding contract size, delivery obligations, and the risk difference between covered and uncovered strategies. If the covered calls are assigned, the investor can deliver the shares they already own, limiting the risk profile on those contracts. For the uncovered calls, if assigned, the investor would need to purchase shares in the market to deliver (or otherwise acquire them), which exposes the investor to potentially unlimited loss if the stock rises substantially above the strike price.

The mechanics are straightforward:

Shares owned: 200

Shares required per call contract: 100

Covered contracts = 200 ÷ 100 = 2

This is also a subtle suitability/risk topic: selling uncovered calls is generally far riskier than selling covered calls, and firms often require higher options approval levels for uncovered writing. Understanding what makes an option “covered” is essential for evaluating both strategy intent and risk exposure.

Step by Step Explanation:

ETF Expense Ratios: ETFs generally have lower expense ratios compared to mutual funds due to their passive management style.

Incorrect Options:

A: ETFs do not have sales loads; they are traded like stocks.

B: ETFs can be purchased on margin, like other equities.

C: ETFs are traded throughout the day at market prices, not NAV.

SEC ETF Fact Sheet: SEC ETF Info.

Step by Step Explanation:

SIPC Coverage Limits: Protects up to $500,000 per customer, including a maximum of $250,000 for cash.

In this case, $300,000 in cash exceeds the SIPC limit, so only $250,000 is protected.

Incorrect Options:

A: $150,000 understates the SIPC limit for cash.

C: The full $300,000 in cash is not protected.

D: Total coverage exceeds SIPC limits.

SIPC Coverage Details: SIPC Protection.

Step by Step Explanation:

FINRA Rule 2210: Firms are prohibited from suggesting or implying FINRA's endorsement or approval in any advertising materials.

Approvals: Even if a principal or FINRA approves the content, such a statement remains impermissible.

Key Point: FINRA's role is to regulate, not to endorse firms or their marketing.

FINRA Rule 2210 (Communications with the Public): FINRA Rule 2210.

This arrangement is not permissible because it is a sales contest/incentive tied directly to the sale of a specific investment company’s products, and it is funded by the product sponsor (ABC). Even if described as “training and education,” the key facts make it a prohibited non-cash compensation practice: the reward is offered only to the top producers of ABC fund sales during the month, and the trip is to a beach resort—creating a strong incentive to recommend ABC funds to maximize eligibility for the reward. This type of incentive can improperly influence recommendations and creates a conflict of interest between the RR’s compensation motivations and the customer’s best interest. Therefore, B is the best answer.

Choice A is not the best reason. The issue is not merely that the incentive is offered by ABC instead of the BD; non-cash compensation rules restrict sales contests and special compensation arrangements regardless of who sponsors them when they are tied to the sale of specific securities. Choice C is incorrect because calling something “training and education” does not make it permissible when the eligibility is driven by production in that sponsor’s products. True training meetings may be permitted under tightly defined conditions, but they cannot be structured as a sales contest rewarding top sellers. Choice D is also incorrect because even strong supervision does not cure a prohibited compensation structure—supervision is required, but it does not override rules designed to prevent conflicted incentives.

The SIE tests recognition that product-specific sales contests and lavish non-cash incentives are problematic because they can lead to biased recommendations and undermine fair dealing and best interest obligations.

FINRA Rule 4511 requires member firms to retain records, including electronic communications, in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format (often referred to as WORM: Write Once, Read Many). This ensures that records cannot be altered or deleted once stored.

D is correct because firms must store records in a tamper-proof format.

A, B, and C are incorrect because these formats do not guarantee compliance with the tamper-proof requirements set forth by FINRA and the SEC.