Free Practice Questions for FINRA SIE Exam

FINRA’s suitability obligations apply when there is a recommendation—including a recommendation to hold a specific security or investment strategy—so A is correct. Suitability is triggered not by general education, but by advice that can reasonably be viewed as urging a customer to take action (buy, sell, or hold) regarding a particular security, account type, or strategy. A “hold” recommendation matters because it can influence a customer’s decision to maintain exposure and forgo alternative actions; therefore, it carries the same expectation that the recommendation aligns with the customer’s investment profile.

Choices B, C, and D are generally framed as non-recommendation communications when presented as purely educational or broadly informational. Descriptive information about an employer plan (choice B) can be educational and may not be a recommendation if it’s factual and not individualized. Asset allocation models based on generally accepted theories (choice C) can be non-recommendation tools when generic and not tailored; however, if a model is personalized or used to steer a specific customer into specific investments, it can become a recommendation. General financial information and basic concepts (choice D) are classic examples of communications that, by themselves, do not typically trigger suitability because they do not direct a customer to a specific action or security.

On the SIE, the key test point is “what constitutes a recommendation.” Once the communication crosses into recommending a specific action (including holding) tied to the customer, suitability obligations apply, including knowing the customer and ensuring the recommendation fits objectives, risk tolerance, time horizon, and liquidity needs.

The most appropriate next step is to notify a supervisor (or follow the firm’s escalation procedures), so A is correct. When a customer expresses dissatisfaction—especially a senior customer and especially when the customer threatens to contact FINRA—this should be treated as a serious compliance matter. Firms have supervisory systems designed to address complaints promptly, document the issue, evaluate suitability and communications, and ensure that required reporting and recordkeeping obligations are met. Escalating to a supervisor is the correct immediate action because it triggers oversight and ensures the firm responds appropriately and consistently.

Choice B is incorrect because a registered representative generally may not reimburse a customer for a loss to resolve a complaint, as that can violate rules regarding improper use of funds, conflicts, and firm policies. Reimbursement decisions, if ever allowed, are typically tightly controlled and would require firm approval, and it is not the RR’s unilateral decision. Choice C is incorrect because not every expression of dissatisfaction automatically requires a Form U4 update; U4 reporting relates to specified disclosure events. The proper first step is internal escalation so the firm can determine whether it constitutes a formal complaint and what reporting is required. Choice D is inappropriate because the RR should not try to preempt the customer by calling FINRA “to explain their side.” The correct process is to handle the complaint through firm supervision and compliance channels.

On the SIE, this ties to customer complaint handling, supervision, and senior investor protections: identify concerns, escalate internally, document, and follow firm procedures rather than attempting self-help solutions.

The correct answer is B, diverse investments with end-of-day trading and pricing. An open-end mutual fund pools money from many investors and invests in a diversified portfolio of securities, such as stocks, bonds, or other assets, depending on its investment objective. A key feature of open-end funds is that they are priced once per day, after the market closes, based on the fund’s net asset value (NAV).

Investors buy and redeem shares directly from the fund company, not in the secondary market. All transactions occur at the end-of-day NAV, regardless of when the order is placed during the trading day.

Choice A is incorrect because intraday trading applies to exchange-traded funds (ETFs), not mutual funds. Choice C describes a money market fund, which is a specific type of mutual fund focused on short-term debt instruments, not all open-end funds. Choice D describes characteristics of hedge funds or private investments, which are illiquid and often charge performance fees.

Thus, the defining features of open-end mutual funds are diversification and end-of-day pricing, making choice B the correct answer.

The correct answer is D, They are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Treasury securities (including Treasury bills, notes, and bonds) are considered among the safest investments because they are guaranteed by the U.S. government’s ability to tax and print money.

Step-by-step, this “full faith and credit” backing means that the government is legally obligated to pay interest and return principal on time, virtually eliminating credit (default) risk. This is why Treasury securities are often used as a benchmark for “risk-free” rates in financial markets.

Choice A is incorrect because Treasury securities are non-callable, meaning the government cannot redeem them prior to maturity. Choice B is incorrect because FDIC insurance applies to bank deposits, not securities. Choice C is incorrect because while Treasury securities are exempt from state and local taxes, they are still subject to federal income tax.

Thus, the defining characteristic of Treasury securities is their government backing, making them extremely low-risk investments and confirming that Answer D is correct.

FINRA’s gifts rule (commonly tested as the $100 per person per year limit) restricts the value of gifts that a member or associated person may give to any one person where the gift is in relation to the recipient’s business. The key test concept is: gifts tied to business cannot exceed $100 annually per recipient (with certain distinctions for bona fide personal gifts and “ordinary and usual business entertainment”). In this question, the gifts are explicitly “as a thank you for recent transactions,” so the business-related gift limit applies. A $125 store gift card exceeds $100, making choice D the violation.

Choices A ($75), B ($90), and C ($100) are at or below the typical annual limit, so they would not violate the $100 threshold (assuming they are gifts—not entertainment—and there are no other gifts to that recipient in the year). The $100 sports event ticket is right at the limit and is generally permissible as a gift under the cap, again assuming no other gifts and treating it as a gift rather than business entertainment.

A common SIE nuance: business entertainment (like taking a client to a game where the RR is present) is often treated differently from a “gift” because it is not simply handing something over—however, a ticket given without the RR attending can be treated as a gift. This question is testing the straightforward dollar cap, not the entertainment distinction. Because the only option that clearly breaches the cap is $125, that is the correct answer.

The broader compliance theme is managing conflicts and improper influence: the gifts rule helps prevent business decisions from being swayed by excessive personal benefit.

Purchasing a put option allows the customer to sell the stock at a predetermined price (the strike price) if the share price declines. This strategy protects against downside risk while maintaining upside potential.

C is correct because a put acts as insurance, locking in a minimum sale price.

A is incorrect because selling a put exposes the investor to additional risk if the stock declines.

B is incorrect because selling a call generates income but does not protect against downside risk.

D is incorrect because purchasing a call is a bullish strategy unrelated to protecting existing positions.

This arrangement is not permissible because it is a sales contest/incentive tied directly to the sale of a specific investment company’s products, and it is funded by the product sponsor (ABC). Even if described as “training and education,” the key facts make it a prohibited non-cash compensation practice: the reward is offered only to the top producers of ABC fund sales during the month, and the trip is to a beach resort—creating a strong incentive to recommend ABC funds to maximize eligibility for the reward. This type of incentive can improperly influence recommendations and creates a conflict of interest between the RR’s compensation motivations and the customer’s best interest. Therefore, B is the best answer.

Choice A is not the best reason. The issue is not merely that the incentive is offered by ABC instead of the BD; non-cash compensation rules restrict sales contests and special compensation arrangements regardless of who sponsors them when they are tied to the sale of specific securities. Choice C is incorrect because calling something “training and education” does not make it permissible when the eligibility is driven by production in that sponsor’s products. True training meetings may be permitted under tightly defined conditions, but they cannot be structured as a sales contest rewarding top sellers. Choice D is also incorrect because even strong supervision does not cure a prohibited compensation structure—supervision is required, but it does not override rules designed to prevent conflicted incentives.

The SIE tests recognition that product-specific sales contests and lavish non-cash incentives are problematic because they can lead to biased recommendations and undermine fair dealing and best interest obligations.

A private securities transaction generally involves an associated person participating in the sale of securities outside the regular scope of their member firm’s business, often referred to as “selling away.” Under FINRA rules, such activity typically requires prior written notice to the firm and, if compensation is involved, firm approval and supervision. Participating in the sale of promissory notes to raise money for a small business is a classic example of a securities transaction that falls into this category, making D correct. Promissory notes can be securities depending on their structure and context, and selling them to investors outside firm supervision raises significant investor protection concerns.

Choices A, B, and C are generally outside business activities that may require disclosure to the firm, but they are not necessarily securities transactions. Selling insurance (especially term life and property/casualty) is typically an insurance activity, not a securities sale (though variable products are securities). Providing accounting/tax services is a professional service, not a securities transaction. Teaching a class is an outside activity, not a securities sale. These may require firm reporting under outside business activity rules, but they are not inherently private securities transactions.

SIE-wise, this question tests your ability to identify when an activity crosses the line from ordinary outside business activity into selling securities away from firm oversight. The high-risk, heavily tested example is the representative selling notes or other investments to customers through a separate business or personal arrangement—this requires firm preapproval and supervision.

Passive ETFs track an index and require minimal management, leading to lower expenses compared to actively managed ETFs.

D is correct because passive ETFs are cost-efficient and have lower fees.

A is incorrect because index ETFs have low turnover since they replicate an index.

B is incorrect because ETFs are priced continuously throughout the trading day.

C is incorrect as ETFs aim to match, not outperform, the index.

Money market mutual funds invest in highly liquid, short-term debt instruments, such as Treasury bills, commercial paper, and certificates of deposit. While the funds aim to maintain a stable $1 NAV, this is not guaranteed.

C is correct because the fund’s investments are short term.

A is incorrect because the rate of return is not fixed; it varies with market interest rates.

B is incorrect because while the fund tries to maintain a $1 NAV, it is not guaranteed.

D is incorrect because yields do not always exceed those of savings accounts.