Free Practice Questions for APICS CPIM-8.0 Exam

A cradle-to-cradle sustainability model is a design concept that aims to create products that can be reused or recycled indefinitely, without generating any waste or pollution. It mimics the natural cycles of nature, where everything is a nutrient for something else. A cradle-to-cradle model differs from a cradle-to-grave model, which follows a linear path of production, consumption, and disposal.

Option B is an example of a cradle-to-cradle model, because the paper waste from the coffee shop is collected and recycled by a supplier, who then provides new paper products to the coffee shop. This creates a closed loop of material flow, where nothing is wasted and the paper is continuously reused.

Option A is not a cradle-to-cradle model, because the laundry service does not reuse or recycle the baby clothes. It only cleans and delivers them, but does not prevent them from eventually ending up in the landfill.

Option C is not a cradle-to-cradle model, because the company does not ensure that the wood it uses is from sustainable sources, or that the products it makes can be easily disassembled and recycled. It also does not consider the environmental impacts of transporting the wood from different locations.

Option D is not a cradle-to-cradle model, because the bank does not directly influence the design or production of the products that the firms use. It only provides financial incentives for them to adopt more sustainable practices, but does not guarantee that they will follow a cradle-to-cradle approach.

References:

•Cradle-to-Cradle for Sustainable Development: From Ecodesign to Circular Economy

•Cradle to Cradle – Sustainability Guide

Customer service performance is the degree to which a company meets or exceeds the expectations of its customers in terms of the quality, timeliness, and satisfaction of the service provided. The most relevant measure of customer service performance is the service perceived by the customer against the service expected by the customer, also known as the service quality gap. This measure captures the difference between what customers expect from a service and what they actually receive, and reflects the level of customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction. A positive service quality gap indicates that the service exceeded the expectations, while a negative service quality gap indicates that the service fell short of the expectations. The other options are not as relevant as the service quality gap because they do not account for the customer’s perspective or perception of the service. Service promised to the customer against service measured by the supplier is an internal measure of service performance, but it does not reflect how the customer perceives the service. Customer complaints received as a percentage of orders shipped is a measure ofservice failure, but it does not capture the positive feedback or the silent dissatisfied customers. Positive customer feedback as a percentage of customer feedback is a measure of service satisfaction, but it does not account for the customer’s expectations or the service quality dimensions. References:

CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 67

Customer Service Metrics: Top 10 to Measure

20 Customer Service KPIs You Need To Know

 The production supervisor is the most appropriate person to send the information about the overage in actual run time for one operation. The production supervisor is responsible for overseeing the execution of the production plan and ensuring that the operations are performed efficiently and effectively. The production supervisor can review the actual run time data and compare it with the planned run time, identify the possible causes of the overage, and take corrective actions if needed. The production supervisor can also explain the overage to the cost accountant and other stakeholders, such as the product manager, the quality manager, and the engineering manager, and provide feedback for improving the planning and routing of the operation. References:

APICS CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 30

[APICS CPIM Learning System Version 8.0], Module 4, Section D, p. 4-35

The supply planning team is responsible for developing a supply plan that balances the demand plan with the available resources and capacities. The functional representatives on the supply planning team, such as production, procurement, engineering, and finance, need to ensure that their functional objectives are considered when developing the plans. For example, production needs to consider the impact of the supply plan on the production schedule, capacity utilization, and labor requirements. Procurement needs to consider the impact of the supply plan on the supplier relationships, lead times, and inventory levels. Engineering needs to consider the impact of the supply plan on the product design, quality, and innovation. Finance needs to consider the impact of the supply plan on the costs, revenues, and profitability. By ensuring that the functional objectives are considered, the supply planning team can create a feasible and optimal supply plan that aligns with the overall business strategy12. References: 1 S&OP: A Comprehensive Overview of Sales and Operations Planning 3 2 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 1

Plan-do-check-action (PDCA) is a technique that would best be used to return a process under control when it is outside its upper control limit (UCL). PDCA is a four-step cycle of continuous improvement that involves planning a change, implementing the change, checking the results, and acting on the findings. PDCA can help identify and eliminate the root causes of variation, improve the process performance, and prevent the recurrence of problems. PDCA is also known as the Deming cycle or the Shewhart cycle. References:

Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 9: Quality Management, Section 9.3: Quality Improvement, Subsection 9.3.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle

CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 8: Quality, Technology and Continuous Improvement, Section 8.2: Continuous Improvement, Subsection 8.2.1: Continuous Improvement Concepts, Subsubsection 8.2.1.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle