Free Practice Questions for iSQI TMMi-P_Syll2020 Exam

The statement thatall defects should be analyzedto prevent as many defects as possible isFALSE. In theDefect Preventionprocess area atTMMi Level 5, only asubset of defects—those that are recurring or considered to be of significant impact—are analyzed. Analyzing all defects would be inefficient and not always necessary. Instead, a targeted approach is used to identifycommon causesof defects and implement actions to prevent their recurrence.

TMMi References:

TheDefect Preventionprocess area is based on the analysis of a subset of defects to find and eliminate common causes​​.

In the context of TMMi, the focus of test process improvement is usually driven by business needs that aim to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and predictability of the testing process. The typical business reasons for test improvement include:

Increase predictability of testing(Option B): This refers to making the testing process more reliable and consistent, allowing better planning and forecasting of testing activities.

Reduce the costs of failure by improving effectiveness of testing(Option C): This is a direct goal of test process improvement, as it helps catch defects earlier, reducing costs associated with defects in later stages of the lifecycle.

Reduce time to market by increasing efficiency of testing activities(Option D): By making testing more efficient, organizations can release products faster while maintaining or improving quality.

Option A,Introduce a new process improvement framework, isNOTa typical business reason for test improvement. This refers to the introduction of a framework, which could be part of a process improvement strategy but is not a direct business reason for improving testing. Test improvement efforts are generally focused on achieving tangible business benefits, such as cost reduction, risk mitigation, or faster delivery, rather than the implementation of a specific framework for its own sake.

TMMi References:

TMMi emphasizes business-driven goals for process improvement that align with reducing risks, enhancing quality, and improving testing efficiency and effectiveness​.

This statement is false because informal assessments do not provide an official result on test process maturity. Informal assessments are designed to give indicative information only and focus on identifying key areas for improvement without leading to a formal maturity rating or certification. In contrast, formal assessments are more comprehensive and provide an official maturity rating when conducted under an accredited assessment method.