Which of the following statements about the testing quadrants model is true?
Each of the four testing quadrants (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) represents a different test level (Q1 = Unit, Q2 = Integration, Q3 = System, and Q4 = Acceptance) and describes the different test types that shall be performed by Agile teams in that test level for an Agile project
Each of the four testing quadrants (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) contains different test types and test levels, and these quadrants are numbered to describe the order in which the associated test types and test levels shall be performed in an Agile project (Q1 first, Q4 last)
Each of the four testing quadrants (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) contains different test types and test levels, and these quadrants can be used by Agile teams and other stakeholders to ensure that all important test types and test levels are included in an Agile project
Each of the four testing quadrants (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) contains different test types and test levels, and these quadrants are numbered to describe the risk level associated with the test types (Q1 = least risky, Q4 = most risky)
The Answer Is:
CExplanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
FromCTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 3.4The Testing Quadrants, it states:
"The Agile testing quadrants are used to ensure that the team considers all important test types and levels during an Agile project. The quadrants categorize tests by their purpose (support development, critique the product) and by the type of feedback (business-facing vs technology-facing)."
Thus,Option Ccorrectly reflects theuse and purposeof the quadrants as aguidance tool, not a fixed sequence or hierarchy.
Option AandBare incorrect — the quadrants arenot mapped to strict levels or chronological order.
Option Dis false —risk is not the basis for quadrant numbering.
Which of the following statements would you expect least likely to be true?
In Agile projects, where an independent test team works in parallel with Agile teams, the independent test team is usually expected to work on functional testing while Agile teams on non-functional testing
In Agile projects where an independent test team works in parallel with Agile teams, the independent test team can work on long-term and/or non-sprint activities such as developing automated test tools
Having independent test teams working in parallel with Agile teams can be required for Agile projects that have to deal with regulatory compliance requirements and complex domains
Having independent test teams working in parallel with Agile teams can be an option when scaling Agile software development, for example when an independent test team supports multiple Agile teams
The Answer Is:
AExplanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
FromCTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 2.5Testers and Independence, it explains:
"An independent test team may be used in parallel to Agile teams to support non-sprint activities such as performance testing, test tool development, or testing in regulated environments."
However, assigningfunctional testing to independent teamswhile Agile teams handlenon-functionalwork is theoppositeof common practice. Agile teams typically focus onfunctional testing, while specializednon-functionalor compliance testing may be handled externally.
Therefore,Option Ais least likely to be true.
Which of the following is a risk that continuous integration introduces?
Teams sometimes over-rely on unit tests and exclude some important system and acceptance tests.
Testers sometimes have too many builds to test, which reduces the quality of testing.
Teams no longer have the ability to run manual tests, as all tests must be automated.
Developer's workload is increased, which can result in a reduction of output.
The Answer Is:
BExplanation:
Continuous integration is a practice of integrating code changes frequently and automatically into a shared repository, and running automated tests to verify the integration. Continuous integration can introduce some risks to the testing process, such as:
Testers sometimes have too many builds to test, which reduces the quality of testing. This can happen when the code changes are too frequent or too large, and the testers do not have enough time or resources to test each build thoroughly. This can lead to missed defects, incomplete test coverage, and reduced confidence in the product quality.
Testers sometimes have to deal with unstable or broken builds, which affects the testability of the product. This can happen when the code changes introduce errors or conflicts that cause the build to fail or malfunction. This can waste the testers’ time and effort, and delay the feedback cycle.
Testers sometimes have to cope with changing requirements and priorities, which affects the test planning and execution. This can happen when the stakeholders or customers provide new or modified requirements or feedback during the development cycle. This can require the testers to adapt their test strategy, test cases, and test data accordingly, and to balance the testing of new features and regression testing of existing features. References: ISTQB® Foundation Level Agile Tester Syllabus1, Section 2.2.3, page 14; ISTQB® Glossary of Testing Terms2, version 4.0, page 15.
Which of the following sentences about the integration of development and testing activities in Agile projects is INCORRECT?
While developers develop automated unit test scripts, testers write automated system level tests.
Testers replace developers in writing unit test automation scripts.
Developers write acceptance criteria and test cases, together with testers.
Developers and testers may work as a pair to develop and test a feature.
The Answer Is:
BExplanation:
Testers replace developers in writing unit test automation scripts. Comprehensive Explanation: The integration of development and testing activities in Agile projects is based on the principle of cross-functional teamwork, where all team members collaborate and share their skills and knowledge to achieve a common goal. In the context of testing, this means that testing is not seen as a separate activity or phase, but as an integral part of the development process. Therefore, the following sentences are correct:
While developers develop automated unit test scripts, testers write automated system level tests. This is an example of how developers and testers can work in parallel and complement each other’s testing efforts. Developers can focus on testing the internal quality of the code, while testers can focus on testing the external quality of the product.
Developers write acceptance criteria and test cases, together with testers. This is an example of how developers and testers can work together to define and verify the user requirements and expectations. Developers can provide their technical expertise and input, while testers can provide their business and user perspective and feedback.
Developers and testers may work as a pair to develop and test a feature. This is an example of how developers and testers can work closely and interactively to deliver a feature. Developers and testers can exchange ideas, suggestions, and information, and support each other in the coding and testing tasks.
The following sentence is incorrect:
Testers replace developers in writing unit test automation scripts. This is not a valid example of the integration of development and testing activities in Agile projects, because it implies that testers take over the responsibility of developers, rather than collaborate with them. Testers should not replace developers in writing unit test automation scripts, because developers have more knowledge and experience in coding and debugging, and because unit testing is an essential part of the development process. Testers should instead work with developers to ensure that the unit test automation scripts are adequate, effective, and maintainable. References: ISTQB® Foundation Level Agile Tester Syllabus1, Section 1.2.1, page 9; ISTQB® Glossary of Testing Terms2, version 4.0, pages 16 and 55.
