Free Practice Questions for Symantec 250-580 Exam

When configuring aVirus and Spyware Protection policywith the actions to "Clean risk" first and "Delete risk" if cleaning fails, two important considerations are:

False Positives (C): There is a risk that legitimate files may be falsely identified as threats and deleted if the cleaning action fails. This outcome underscores the importance of careful policy configuration to avoid loss of important files.

Quarantine Copy (E): Even if a file is deleted, a copy might still remain in the quarantine. This backup allows for retrieval if the deletion was a false positive or if further analysis of the file is required for investigation purposes.

These considerations help administrators avoid unintended data loss and maintain flexibility for future review of quarantined threats.

TheRestricted Administratorrole in theIntegrated Cyber Defense Manager (ICDm)has themost limited permissionsamong the default roles. This role is intended for users who need access to basic functionality without any critical or high-level administrative capabilities, ensuring a lower risk of accidental or unauthorized changes.

Role of Restricted Administrator:

Restricted Administrators have highly constrained access, typically limited to viewing specific information and performing minimal actions.

Why Other Roles Are Incorrect:

Endpoint Console Domain Administrator(Option A) andServer Administrator(Option B) have broader permissions to manage endpoint settings and server configurations.

Limited Administrator(Option D) has more permissions than Restricted Administrator, though still not full access.

References: The Restricted Administrator role provides minimal permissions, ensuring limited system access and reducing security risks associated with more privileged roles​.

When aSymantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) clienthas multiplemanagement serverslisted in its priority 1 list and the currently selected management server becomes unavailable, the SEP clientrandomly selects another serverfrom the list. This randomized selection helps distribute load among the available servers and ensures continuity of management services.

Mechanism of Random Selection:

By choosing the next server randomly, SEP clients help balance the load across available servers, avoiding potential bottlenecks.

This method also ensures that the client can quickly connect to an alternative server without requiring additional logic for server selection.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

SEP clients do not evaluateserver load(Option B), IP addresses (Option C), oralphabetical order(Option D) when selecting an alternate server.

References: The SEP client’s randomized approach to selecting management servers ensures efficient load distribution and server availability​.

A singleSymantec Endpoint Detection and Response (SEDR) Managercan support up to100,000 endpoints. This maximum capacity allows the SEDR Manager to handle endpoint data processing, monitoring, and response for large-scale environments.

Scalability and Management:

SEDR Manager is designed to manage endpoint security for extensive networks efficiently. Supporting up to 100,000 endpoints provides enterprises with a centralized solution for comprehensive threat detection and response.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

200,000endpoints (Option A) exceeds the designed capacity.

25,000and50,000endpoints (Options B and D) are below the actual maximum capacity for a single SEDR Manager.

References: This endpoint capacity aligns with Symantec’s specifications for SEDR’s scalability in enterprise deployments​.

When setting up Active Directory (AD) integration with Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM), Symantec's best practice is toimport the existing AD structureto manage clients in user mode. This approach offers several benefits:

Simplified Client Management:By importing the AD structure, SEPM can mirror the organizational structure already defined in AD, enabling easier management and assignment of policies to groups or organizational units.

User-Based Policies:Organizing clients in user mode allows policies to follow users across devices, providing consistent protection regardless of where the user logs in.

Streamlined Updates and Permissions:Integration with AD ensures that any changes in user accounts or groups are automatically reflected within SEPM, reducing administrative effort and potential errors in client organization.

This best practice enhances SEPM’s functionality by leveraging the established structure in AD.

For anAfter Actions Reportin Symantec EDR, an Incident Responder should gather data from both theIncident ManagerandSyslog:

Incident Manager:

This is the primary interface for tracking incidents, where responders can review incident details, timeline, response actions, and associated IoCs. It provides a full view of the case, including actions taken and the threat’s impact on the environment.

Syslog:

Syslog captures logs and alerts from various network devices and security systems, providing valuable information on system events related to the incident. Collectingsyslog data helps in analyzing broader network impacts and documenting incident response activities.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

Policies(Option B) are not directly relevant to specific incident details.

Action Manager(Option D) tracks response actions but lacks the comprehensive case view provided by Incident Manager.

Endpoint Search(Option E) is a tool for querying endpoint data but is not a centralized reporting source.

References: Incident Manager and Syslog are crucial for gathering actionable data and documenting the response for After Actions Reports in EDR​.

InSymantec Endpoint Detection and Response (SEDR), theBlock Listfeature allows administrators to manually block a specific file hash identified as malicious. By adding the hash of the malicious file to the Block List, SEDR ensures that the file cannot execute or interact with the network, preventing further harm. This manual blocking capability provides administrators with direct control over specific threats detected in their environment.

To locate unmanaged endpoints within a specific network subnet, an administrator should utilize theDiscover and Deploysetting. This feature scans the network for endpoints without security management, enabling administrators to identify and initiate the deployment of Symantec Endpoint Protection agents on unmanaged devices. This proactive approach ensures comprehensive coverage across the network, allowing for efficient detection and management of all endpoints within the organization.

In the MITRE ATT&CK framework, theExecutionphase encompasses techniques that attackers use to run malicious code on a target system. This includes methods forexploiting software vulnerabilities to tamper directly with system memory, often by triggering unintended behaviors such as arbitrary code execution or modifying memory contents to inject malware.

Execution Phase Overview:

The Execution phase is specifically focused on methods that enable an attacker torun unauthorized code. This might involve exploiting software faults to manipulate memory and bypass defenses.

Memory Exploit Relevance:

Memory exploits, such as buffer overflows or code injections, fall into this phase as they allow attackers to gain control over system processes by tampering with memory.

These exploits can directly manipulate memory, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary instructions, thereby gaining unauthorized control over the application or even the operating system.

Why Other Phases Are Incorrect:

Defense Evasioninvolves hiding malicious activities rather than direct execution.

Exfiltrationpertains to the theft of data from a system.

Discoveryis focused on gathering information about the system or network, not executing code.

References: This answer is based on theMITRE ATT&CK framework’s definition of the Execution phase, which encompasses memory exploitation techniques as a means to execute unauthorized code​.

Disjointed telemetry collection within an organization can result ina lack of granular visibilityfor investigators. Here’s why this is problematic:

Incomplete Data:Disjointed collection methods lead to fragmented data, making it difficult for security teams to get a complete picture of incidents.

Reduced Investigation Efficiency:Without granular and cohesive telemetry, investigators struggle to trace the attack’s path accurately, slowing down response times.

Increased Risk of Missing Key Indicators:Critical indicators of compromise may be overlooked, allowing threats to persist or re-emerge in the environment.

Unified telemetry is essential for thorough and efficient investigations, as it provides the detailed insights necessary to understand and mitigate threats fully.