Free Practice Questions for Symantec 250-580 Exam

Toblock facebook.com use during business hours, the SEP administrator should configure theAction, Hosts(s), and Schedulecomponents within the Firewall rule.

Explanation of Each Component:

Action: Set to "Block" to deny access to the specified site.

Hosts(s): Specify facebook.com as the target host, ensuring that all traffic to this domain is blocked.

Schedule: Define the rule to apply only during business hours, ensuring that access is restricted within the designated time frame.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Network InterfaceandNetwork Service(Options A and B) are not specific to blocking domain access.

Application(Options B and D) is unnecessary if the goal is to block access based on domain and schedule.

References: Configuring Action, Hosts, and Schedule within SEP firewall rules enables precise access control based on time and target domain​.

To minimize sudden IOPS impact on the ESXi server due toSEP endpoint communication, the administrator shouldincrease the download randomization window. This configuration change helps spread out the timing of SEP updates across virtual machines, reducing the simultaneous I/O load on the server.

Effect of Download Randomization:

By increasing the randomization window, updates are downloaded at staggered intervals rather than all at once, lowering the burst IOPS demand.

This is especially beneficial in virtualized environments where multiple VMs are hosted on a single ESXi server, as it prevents performance degradation from high IOPS activity.

Why Other Options Are Less Effective:

Increasing Download Insight sensitivity(Option A) has no impact on IOPS.

Reducing the heartbeat interval(Option B) could increase communication frequency, potentially raising IOPS.

Reducing content revisions(Option D) affects storage size but does not control update IOPS.

References: Increasing the download randomization window is a recommended practice in virtual environments to manage IOPS demands during SEP update cycles​.

When an administrator adds a file to the deny list in Symantec Endpoint Protection, the file is automaticallyassigned to the default Deny List policy. This action results in the following:

Immediate Blocking:The file is blocked from executing on any endpoint where the Deny List policy is enforced, effectively preventing the file from causing harm.

Consistent Enforcement:Using the default Deny List policy ensures that the file is denied access across all relevant endpoints without the need for additional customization.

Centralized Management:Administrators can manage and review the default Deny List policy within SEPM, providing an efficient method for handling potentially harmful files across the network.

This default behavior ensures swift response to threats by leveraging a centralized deny list policy.

TheHost Integrity Policyin Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) is required for using theIsolate functionin Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (SEDR). Host Integrity enables administrators to enforce security compliance on endpoints and is essential for isolation functions, ensuring that non-compliant or compromised systems are restricted from communicating with the network.

How Host Integrity Policy Supports Isolation:

By enforcing Host Integrity, SEP can ensure that endpoints adhere to security requirements before they are allowed network access, and if they do not comply, they can be isolated.

This policy provides the framework that integrates with SEDR’s isolate function for responsive threat containment.

Why Other Options Are Not Suitable:

Host Isolation Policy(Option A) is not an actual SEP feature.

Application Control(Option B) manages application behavior but is not tied to endpoint isolation.

Application Detection(Option D) identifies applications but does not handle isolation.

References: The Host Integrity Policy in SEP is integral to implementing isolation capabilities in conjunction with SEDR​.

Amedium-priority incidentin Symantec’s framework indicates that the incidentmay have an impact on the business. This priority level suggests that while the incident is not immediately critical, it still poses a potential risk to business operations and should be addressed.

Understanding Medium-Priority Impact:

Medium-priority incidents are not severe enough to cause immediate operational disruption but may still affect business processes or data security if left unresolved.

Prompt action is recommended to prevent escalation or downstream effects on business functions.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Business outage(Option B) would likely be classified as high priority.

No impact on critical operations(Option C) would suggest a lower priority.

Safe to ignore(Option D) does not reflect the importance of addressing medium-priority incidents.

References: A medium-priority incident signifies a non-critical yet potentially impactful event, requiring appropriate attention to mitigate business risks​.

To allow the use of aremote administration tool detected as Hacktool.KeyLoggProwithout interference from SEP, the administrator should create aKnown Risk exceptionfor the tool. This exception type allows specific files or applications to bypass detection, thereby avoiding quarantine or blocking actions.

Steps to Create a Known Risk Exception:

In the SEP management console, navigate toPolicies > Exceptions.

Choose to create aKnown Risk exceptionand specify the tool’s executable file or file path to prevent SEP from identifying it as a threat.

Why Known Risk Exception is Appropriate:

This type of exception is designed for tools that SEP detects as potentially risky (like hacktools or keyloggers) but are authorized for legitimate use by the organization.

Creating this exception allows the tool to operate without being flagged or quarantined.

Reasons Other Options Are Less Effective:

Tamper Protect exceptionsonly prevent SEP from being tampered with by other applications.

Application to Monitor exceptionsmonitor applications without preventing quarantine actions.

SONAR exceptionsare specific to behavior-based detections, not risk definitions.

References: Creating Known Risk exceptions is the recommended approach when allowing specific tools in SEP that may otherwise be detected as threats​.

TheMITRE ATT&CK Matrixconsists ofTactics and Techniques. Tactics represent the "why" or goals behind each step of an attack, while Techniques represent the "how," describing the specific methods adversaries use to achieve their objectives. Together, they form a comprehensive framework for understanding and categorizing attacker behavior.

Structure of the MITRE ATT&CK Matrix:

Tactics: High-level objectives attackers seek to achieve (e.g., initial access, execution, persistence).

Techniques: Specific methods used to accomplish each tactic (e.g., phishing, credential dumping).

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Problems and Solutions(Option A) do not capture the functional structure of ATT&CK.

Attackers and Techniques(Option B) lacks the tactics component.

Entities and Tactics(Option D) does not describe ATT&CK’s approach to categorizing attacker actions.

References: The MITRE ATT&CK Matrix is organized by tactics and techniques, offering a detailed view of adversarial behavior and threat methodologies​.

When a policy is duplicated in Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), the duplicated policy is assigned aversion number of "One". This means that the new policy starts fresh with a version number of 1, separate from the original policy’s version history. The SEP system uses this new version number to track any subsequent changes to the duplicated policy independently of the original.

References: This is consistent with SEP’s policy management approach, where versioning for duplicated policies starts anew at 1 to ensure clarity in tracking policy versions​.

In Symantec EDR’s Behavioral Isolation policy, if theBehavioral Heat Mapindicates that a specific application and a particular behavior are never used together, setting the action toDenyfor that application behavior is a safe response. This prevents potential misuse by blocking the unusual behavior, which could indicate a security risk.

Rationale for Denying the Behavior:

If historical data shows that this behavior does not normally occur with the application, it suggests that any attempt to initiate it could be anomalous or malicious. Blocking this behavior helps prevent unexpected activities that could be exploited by threats.

Why Other Actions Are Less Appropriate:

Allow(Option B) would permit potentially risky behavior.

Delete(Option C) does not apply in this context, as it is not an action for behavior control.

Monitor(Option D) would only log the behavior but does not provide active protection, which is critical when the behavior is atypical.

References: Setting aDenyaction based on Behavioral Heat Map insights aligns with best practices for proactive threat prevention in Symantec EDR​.

To reduce the risk of unauthorized access when administrators forget to log off, the setting"Allow users to save credentials when logging on"should be disabled in Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM). Disabling this option ensures that administrators are required to enter their credentials each time they access the SEPM console, preventing automatic logins and reducing the chance of someone else gaining access without permission.

Purpose of Disabling Saved Credentials:

By preventing credential saving, SEPM forces each administrator to authenticate manually on every session, thus improving security.

This setting is particularly useful in shared environments, as it prevents the console from retaining login information when an administrator fails to log out.

Why Other Options Are Less Relevant:

Delete clients that have not connected(Option B) pertains to endpoint clients, not administrator logins.

Lock account after unsuccessful attempts(Option C) protects against brute-force attempts but does not address saved credentials.

Allow administrators to reset passwords(Option D) is related to password management rather than login persistence.

References: Disabling saved credentials is a best practice to enforce unique logins for each session, enhancing security in shared console environments​.