Free Practice Questions for Saviynt SAVIGA-C01 Exam

Closed: SoD Violations which are closed with or without remediation

Open: SoD Violations which require immediate attention

Risk Accepted: SoD Violations which have Mitigation Controls applied

In Process: SoD Violations which are assigned

Closed: This status implies that the SoD violation has been addressed. It could have been resolved through remediation (e.g., removing conflicting access) or through acceptance after a review process (without direct remediation, perhaps mitigated in another way).

Open: This status indicates that the SoD violation is active and needs immediate attention to mitigate the associated risk.

Risk Accepted: This status suggests that the SoD violation has been acknowledged, but instead of being fully remediated, mitigation controls have been put in place to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. This usually follows a formal risk acceptance process.

In Process: This status means that the SoD violation is currently being worked on. It has likely been assigned to someone for investigation, remediation, or further action.

Therefore, the matches you've made in the image are accurate and reflect standard SoD management practices.

User Account Correlation Rules in Saviynt are specifically designed to map imported accounts to existing users within the system. These rules define the logic for matching accounts to users based on various attributes, such as employee ID, email address, or username.

Why other options are incorrect:

Account to User Rule: This is not a standard rule type in Saviynt.

Account Name Rule: This might focus on naming conventions for accounts, not correlating them to users.

Technical Rule: This is a broader category of rules and doesn't specifically address account-user mapping.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: The section on Account Correlation Rules provides detailed information on how to configure these rules for different scenarios.

Saviynt Use Cases: Saviynt often provides examples and use cases demonstrating how to use User Account Correlation Rules to automate account mapping during imports.

The formats suitable for downloading an Analytics report in Saviynt typically include A. CSV file and Excel Sheet. Here's an explanation:

Saviynt's Reporting Capabilities: Saviynt provides options for exporting and downloading analytics reports in various formats to facilitate data sharing and further analysis.

Common Export Formats:

CSV (Comma Separated Values): A widely used format for storing tabular data in plain text. It's easily imported into various data analysis tools and spreadsheet programs.

Excel Sheet (e.g., .xlsx): A popular spreadsheet format that allows for data organization, formatting, and calculations.

Why These Formats Are Suitable:

Data Analysis: Both CSV and Excel formats are well-suited for further data analysis and manipulation.

Reporting: They are commonly used for creating reports and sharing data with stakeholders.

Compatibility: Most data analysis and reporting tools support these formats.

Other Less Common Options: While less frequent, Saviynt might offer other export formats like PDF, depending on the specific version and configuration.

B. Text file: Although technically a text file, a raw .txt export might not be as useful for structured data like analytics reports. CSV would be preferred.

In conclusion: CSV and Excel are the most common and practical formats for downloading analytics reports from Saviynt, offering flexibility for data analysis, reporting, and sharing.

The statement "An Application Owner Campaign can have multiple primary Certifiers and a single secondary Certifier" is generally False in Saviynt. Here's why:

Saviynt's Application Owner Campaign: This campaign type is designed for Application Owners to review and certify access to their applications.

Primary Certifier: There is usually a single designated Application Owner for each application. This is because application ownership is typically a single point of accountability. While it is technically possible to assign multiple owners, it is not considered a best practice.

Secondary Certifiers (Backup/Delegates): Application Owner Campaigns can have multiple secondary certifiers. These are often used as:

Backup: To ensure the campaign can proceed if the primary certifier is unavailable.

Delegates: To allow the primary certifier to delegate some of the certification tasks.

Consultants: Other stakeholders, such as security or compliance teams, who can be consulted during the decision-making process.

Why the Statement Is Generally False: The core principle of application ownership implies a single point of accountability. While multiple secondary certifiers can assist, having multiple primary certifiers can lead to confusion and conflicting decisions.

Possible Exceptions (Less Common):

Highly Customized Configurations: In some very specific scenarios, organizations might customize Saviynt to allow multiple primary certifiers for an application, but this is not a standard or recommended practice.

The Saviynt feature that allows detection of access rights granted outside the Saviynt platform is the B. RevokeOutOfBandAccessJob. Here's a detailed explanation:

Out-of-Band Access: This refers to access that is provisioned directly in the target system, bypassing the normal access request and approval processes within Saviynt. This can create security risks and compliance issues.

Saviynt's Reconciliation Process: Saviynt uses a reconciliation process to compare the access rights defined within its system with the actual access rights present in connected applications.

RevokeOutOfBandAccessJob: This specific job is designed to identify and flag out-of-band access. It works by:

Importing Account and Entitlement Data: The job imports data from the target system, capturing the current state of user access.

Comparing with Saviynt Data: It compares this imported data with the access rights managed within Saviynt.

Identifying Discrepancies: Any discrepancies, where a user has access in the target system that wasn't granted through Saviynt, are identified as out-of-band access.

Taking Action (Optional): The job can be configured to automatically revoke this out-of-band access or to simply generate a report for review and manual remediation. Or it can be configured to create a task for an administrator to review.

Saviynt's Access Governance: This feature is a crucial part of Saviynt's overall access governance capabilities, helping organizations maintain control over user access and enforce the principle of least privilege.

Other Options:

A. REST API: While Saviynt's REST API can be used to interact with the system and potentially retrieve access data, it's not the specific feature designed for out-of-band access detection.

C. Bulk Upload: This is a method for importing data into Saviynt, but it doesn't inherently detect out-of-band access.

D. ARS > Request Access for Others: This is part of the access request process, not related to detecting access granted outside of Saviynt.

In conclusion: The RevokeOutOfBandAccessJob in Saviynt plays a vital role in identifying and remediating out-of-band access, ensuring that access rights are managed centrally and consistently through the Saviynt platform.

In Saviynt, Endpoints represent the systems or applications that Saviynt manages. Accounts, entitlement types, and entitlement data are all directly associated with these endpoints because they define how access is structured and granted within those specific systems.

Endpoints as the Foundation: Endpoints are the core objects in Saviynt's identity governance framework. They provide the context for managing access, as all entitlements and accounts exist within the context of a specific endpoint (application or system).

Why other options are incorrect:

Roles: Roles are collections of entitlements, but they are not the primary object that accounts and entitlements are directly linked to.

Workflows: Workflows are processes, not the systems or applications themselves.

Security Systems: While related to security, this term is too broad and doesn't specifically refer to the systems being managed.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: The section on Application Onboarding and Endpoint Management in Saviynt's documentation clarifies the role of endpoints as the central objects for managing access.

Saviynt User Interface: When configuring applications or systems in Saviynt, you define them as endpoints, and all related accounts and entitlements are managed within that endpoint's context.

In Saviynt, "Entitlements" refers to any type of access granted to users within a managed system or application. This broad term encompasses various forms of access controls, including:

Groups: Collections of users with shared access permissions.

Roles: Sets of permissions that define a user's job function or responsibilities.

Permissions: Specific access rights to resources or functionalities.

Responsibilities: Duties or tasks associated with a particular role.

Why other options are incorrect:

Endpoints: Refer to network devices or systems, not access rights.

Workflows: Are automated processes for tasks like approvals, not access itself.

Accounts: Represent user identities, not the specific access they have.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: Saviynt's documentation consistently uses the term "Entitlements" to describe the various types of access it manages.

Saviynt User Interface: The Saviynt interface uses "Entitlements" throughout its menus and features related to access management.

It is True that multiple indices can be selected while creating Analytics using the Elasticsearch Query in Saviynt. Here's why:

Saviynt's Analytics and Elasticsearch: Saviynt's analytics capabilities are often built on top of Elasticsearch, a powerful search and analytics engine.

Indices in Elasticsearch: In Elasticsearch, an index is like a database table. It's a collection of documents with similar characteristics. Saviynt uses indices to store various types of data, such as user data, account data, entitlement data, and event logs.

Multi-Index Queries: Elasticsearch allows you to query across multiple indices simultaneously. This is a fundamental feature of the search engine.

Saviynt's Interface: When creating analytics in Saviynt using Elasticsearch queries, the interface typically allows you to select multiple indices as the data source for your analysis.

Use Cases: This capability is essential for creating comprehensive analytics that span different data domains. For example, you might want to analyze user access patterns (from one index) in conjunction with application usage data (from another index).

In conclusion: The ability to select multiple indices is a core feature of Elasticsearch and is supported within Saviynt's analytics interface,

=================

The statement is False. In the provided USER_IMPORT_MAPPING, USERNAME is the user attribute defined in EIC (Enterprise Identity Cloud), and wd:User_Name is the attribute defined in Workday. Here's a breakdown:

Saviynt's USER_IMPORT_MAPPING: This configuration within a connection (in this case, Workday RAAS) defines how data from the connected system (Workday) should be mapped to attributes within Saviynt's EIC.

ImportMapping: This section specifies the mapping between source attributes (Workday) and target attributes (EIC).

USERNAME: In the provided mapping, USERNAME (without the wd: prefix) is the target attribute, meaning it's an attribute within Saviynt's EIC.

wd:User_Name: The wd: prefix typically indicates a Workday attribute. Therefore, wd:User_Name is the source attribute from Workday.

~#~string: This likely indicates the data type of the attribute (string in this case).

Correct Interpretation: The mapping is saying: "Take the value of the wd:User_Name attribute from Workday and map it to the USERNAME attribute in EIC."

In essence: The USER_IMPORT_MAPPING defines how data from Workday is translated into Saviynt's internal data model, and in this case, USERNAME belongs to Saviynt (EIC), while wd:User_Name belongs to Workday.