Free Practice Questions for Saviynt SAVIGA-C01 Exam

Saviynt primarily leverages SAML 2.0 as its core authentication mechanism. SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) is an open standard for exchanging authentication and authorization data between parties, in this case, between users and Saviynt. It allows for secure, single sign-on experiences.

While Saviynt can interact with databases, REST APIs, and LDAP directories for various purposes like identity data aggregation or provisioning, these are not its primary authentication methods.

Databases: Saviynt can connect to databases to pull identity information, but the platform itself doesn't authenticate users directly against a database.

REST: REST APIs are used for programmatic interaction with Saviynt, not typically for initial user authentication.

LDAP: While LDAP can be a source of identity data, Saviynt's core authentication relies on SAML for its standardized and secure approach.

Key Saviynt IGA references supporting this:

Saviynt Documentation: The official Saviynt documentation consistently refers to SAML as the primary authentication mechanism.

Saviynt Connectors: Saviynt provides pre-built connectors for various identity providers (IdPs) that support SAML, further emphasizing its reliance on this standard.

Saviynt Training Materials: Saviynt's training courses and certifications highlight SAML's role in the platform's authentication framework.

In Saviynt, a Campaign is best described as a D. Group of similar Certifications. Here's a breakdown:

Saviynt's Campaigns and Certifications:

Campaign: A container that defines the scope, schedule, participants, and other settings for a set of related access certifications.

Certification: The individual review task assigned to a Certifier (e.g., a manager reviewing their subordinates' access, an application owner reviewing users of their application).

Analogy: Think of a Campaign as a project, and Certifications as individual tasks within that project.

Purpose of Campaigns: Campaigns provide a structured way to manage and track access reviews, ensuring that they are conducted regularly and consistently.

Examples of Campaigns:

User Manager Campaign: Groups certifications where managers review their subordinates' access.

Entitlement Owner Campaign: Groups certifications where entitlement owners review who has access to their entitlements.

Application Owner Campaign: Groups certifications where application owners review who has access to their applications.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Group of similar Endpoints: Endpoints are systems or applications connected to Saviynt, not the primary grouping within a campaign.

B. Group of User Groups: User groups are collections of users, not the defining element of a campaign.

C. Group of Dashboards: Dashboards provide visualizations of data, but they are not the core component of a campaign.

In conclusion: A Campaign in Saviynt is essentially a container for a set of related access certifications, providing a framework for managing and organizing the review process based on specific criteria and objectives.

To save different settings for various categories of Manager Access Reviews within User Manager Campaigns, a Campaign Owner can create C. Campaign Templates. Here's why:

Saviynt's Campaign Templates: Templates allow you to pre-configure various settings for a campaign and save them as a reusable template. This includes settings related to:

Campaign Scope: Defining which users, applications, or entitlements are included.

Certifier Selection: Specifying the type of certifiers (e.g., Managers, Application Owners).

Scheduling and Notifications: Setting up the campaign schedule and email notifications.

Advanced Configurations: Including filters, risk scores, and other advanced settings.

Multiple Templates for Different Categories: A Campaign Owner can create multiple templates, each tailored to a specific category of Manager Access Review. For example:

Template 1: For high-risk applications, with stricter filters and more frequent reviews.

Template 2: For low-risk applications, with broader scope and less frequent reviews.

Template 3: For specific departments or business units, with customized certifier selection.

Benefits of Using Templates:

Consistency: Ensures that similar types of reviews are conducted consistently.

Efficiency: Saves time by eliminating the need to configure each campaign from scratch.

Reduced Errors: Minimizes the risk of manual configuration errors.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A. Global Configurations: Global configurations apply to all campaigns, not to specific categories of reviews.

B. Campaign Types: Campaign types (e.g., User Manager, Entitlement Owner) define the overall purpose of the campaign, not the specific settings for different categories within a campaign type.

D. Campaign Previews: Previews are for reviewing the campaign data before launch, not for saving different configurations.

In conclusion: Campaign Templates in Saviynt provide a powerful way to save and reuse different configurations for various categories of Manager Access Reviews, promoting consistency, efficiency, and accuracy in the certification process.

=================

The UIADMIN ROLE in Saviynt grants users the privilege to edit UI (User Interface) labels. This role is crucial for customizing the Saviynt interface to align with an organization's terminology and branding.

UI Customization: Saviynt allows administrators to modify various UI elements, including labels, to improve user experience and comprehension. The UIADMIN ROLE provides the necessary permissions for these modifications.

Why other options are incorrect:

The other options are not standard Saviynt roles and do not have any associated privileges for UI label editing.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: The documentation on Saviynt's administration and configuration settings includes information about UI customization and the associated UIADMIN ROLE.

Saviynt Support: Saviynt's support resources may contain articles or knowledge base entries related to UI customization and the permissions required.

To configure a single report that displays the account attributes of all the accounts to their respective Application Owners in Saviynt, the best approach is D. V2 Analytics using SQL Query with User Context. Here's a breakdown:

Saviynt's Analytics V2: This is Saviynt's newer analytics platform, offering more advanced features and flexibility compared to the older version.

SQL Query with User Context: This is the key to achieving the desired outcome. "User Context" means that the query will be executed in the context of the currently logged-in user (in this case, the Application Owner).

How it Works:

Dynamic Filtering: When an Application Owner runs the report, the "User Context" will automatically filter the data to show only the accounts that they own.

Security and Data Privacy: This ensures that each Application Owner only sees the data that they are authorized to access.

SQL Query Structure: The SQL query would likely involve a JOIN between the accounts table and a table that defines application ownership (e.g., applications), using a WHERE clause that filters based on the current user's ID or username. Something like this (syntax might need adjustment for Saviynt's specific SQL dialect):

SELECT a.*

FROM accounts a

JOIN applications app ON a.application_id = app.application_id

WHERE app.owner_id = ${CURRENT_USER_ID} -- This is the user context part

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A. Use Elasticsearch Query: While Elasticsearch can be used for analytics, it might not be the best tool for this specific requirement, as it doesn't inherently support the concept of "User Context" in the same way as SQL queries in Analytics V2.

B. V2 Analytics using SQL Query with External Connection: External connections are used to query data from external databases, which is not necessary in this scenario.

C. V2 Analytics using SQL Query with Allowed Action: Allowed Actions are used to define actions that can be performed on analytics results, not for filtering data based on user context.

The Job that should be created and scheduled to evaluate Rules on a need basis in Saviynt is A. Run Detective Rules and Take Action. Here's an explanation:

Saviynt's Jobs: Saviynt uses Jobs to perform various tasks, including data imports, rule evaluations, and provisioning operations.

"Run Detective Rules and Take Action": This specific job is designed to:

Evaluate Rules: It evaluates rules that are configured for detective (monitoring) purposes. These rules typically check for specific conditions or changes in user attributes, access rights, or other data.

Take Action (Optional): Based on the rule evaluation results, the job can be configured to automatically take actions, such as:

Generating alerts or notifications.

Creating tasks for administrators to review.

Triggering workflows.

Automatically remediating issues (e.g., revoking access if a rule detects a violation).

Scheduling: This job can be scheduled to run periodically (e.g., daily, hourly) to continuously monitor for changes and enforce defined rules.

On-Demand Execution: You can also run this job on-demand to evaluate rules immediately.

Other Options:

B. Provisioning Job: This job is primarily used for provisioning access to target systems, not for evaluating general-purpose rules.

C. User Import via Connection: This job is for importing user data from external sources.

D. Trigger Chain Job: This allows for running a series or "chain" of jobs, but it doesn't directly evaluate rules itself.

The configuration that can be used to allow Certifiers to certify their own access in a Saviynt Campaign is C. Allow Self Certification. Here's why:

Saviynt's Campaign Configuration: Saviynt provides various configuration options to control the behavior of certification campaigns, including how self-certification is handled.

"Allow Self Certification": This specific setting, when enabled, permits Certifiers to review and certify their own access within the campaign.

Security Considerations: While enabling self-certification can streamline the process, it also introduces a potential security risk. Organizations should carefully consider their risk tolerance and compliance requirements before enabling this option.

Alternative Approaches: To mitigate the risks of self-certification, organizations might consider:

Requiring additional approvals: Adding a second level of approval for self-certified items.

Close monitoring: Implementing stricter monitoring and auditing of self-certified access.

Disabling self-certification: In high-security environments, self-certification might be prohibited altogether.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A. Certify all users by default: This setting is not directly related to self-certification.

B. Show consult for own access: This option usually allows a certifier to consult with another user before making a decision, but doesn't enable self certification.

D. Certification reassignment: This allows for reassigning certification tasks to other users, but doesn't directly address self-certification.

In conclusion: The "Allow Self Certification" setting in a Saviynt campaign configuration directly controls whether Certifiers can certify their own access, providing flexibility but requiring careful consideration of the associated security implications.

=================

In the given scenario, where ABC Company has a one-level workflow with the manager as the sole approver, and Margaret (Edward's manager) raises a request on behalf of Edward, the statement that would be true/applicable is A. Manager's approval is auto-approved. Here's why:

Saviynt's Workflow Configuration: Saviynt allows for the configuration of various workflow scenarios, including auto-approval based on certain conditions.

Self-Approval Prevention/Auto-Approval: A common security best practice is to prevent users from approving their own access requests. However, when a manager requests on behalf of a subordinate, this is considered a delegated request and many organizations find it acceptable to auto-approve since the approval should be implicit in the act of requesting.

Manager Requesting on Behalf: When a manager initiates a request for a subordinate, it's often considered an implicit approval. The manager is essentially saying, "I approve this access for my team member."

Saviynt's Default Behavior (Typically): By default, or through common configuration practices, Saviynt is often set up to recognize this scenario and auto-approve the manager's approval step in the workflow. This streamlines the process and avoids unnecessary delays.

Configuration Options: While auto-approval is common, Saviynt's workflow engine is flexible. It's possible to configure it differently, for instance, to still require explicit manager approval even in this scenario. However, this is less typical.

Other Options:

B. Manager's approval is auto-rejected: This is highly unlikely and would defeat the purpose of having a manager initiate the request.

C. Manager must manually approve/reject the request: While possible through configuration, it's not the typical or default behavior in this scenario.

D. None of the above: Option A is the most likely and common outcome.

In summary: In a one-level workflow where the manager is the approver, and the manager requests access on behalf of a subordinate, Saviynt is typically configured to auto-approve the manager's approval step, streamlining the process and reflecting the implicit approval inherent in the manager's action.

=================