Free Practice Questions for Salesforce Salesforce-AI-Specialist Exam

When an active standard email prompt template doesn’t meet the business requirements, the best approach is to clone the existing template and modify it as needed. Cloning allows the AI Specialist to preserve the original template while making adjustments to fit specific business needs. This ensures that any customizations are applied without altering the original standard template.

Saving as a new version is typically used for versioning changes in the same template, while Save as New Template creates a brand-new template without linking to the existing one. Cloning provides a balance, allowing modifications while retaining the original structure for future reference.

For more details, refer to Salesforce Prompt Builder documentation for guidance on cloning and modifying templates.

Context of the Question

Universal Containers (UC) has a strict change management process that requires all possible configuration be completed in a sandbox and deployed to Production.

Einstein Generative AI is already enabled in Production, and the “Einstein Work Summaries” permission set is already available in Production.

The AI Specialist needs to configure Work Summaries for Enhanced Messaging in the sandbox.

What Can Actually Be Deployed from Sandbox to Production?

Custom Fields: Metadata that is easily created in sandbox and then deployed.

Quick Actions: Also metadata-based and can be deployed from sandbox to production.

Layout Components: Page layout changes (such as adding the Wrap Up component) can be added to a change set or deployment package.

Why Option C is Correct

No Need to Turn on Einstein in Sandbox for Deployment: Einstein Generative AI is already enabled in Production; turning it on in the sandbox is typically a manual step if you want to test, but that step itself is not “deployable” in the sense of metadata.

Permission Set Assignments (as in Option A) are not deployable metadata. You can deploy the Permission Set itself but not the specific user assignments. Since the question specifically asks “Which other configuration steps should be taken in the sandbox that can be deployed to the production org?”, user assignment is not one of them.

Why Not Option A or B?

Option A: Mentions creating permission set assignments for agents. This cannot be directly deployed from sandbox to Production, as permission set assignments are user-specific and considered “data,” not metadata.

Option B: Mentions “Turn on Einstein.” But Einstein Generative AI is already enabled in Production. Additionally, “Turning on Einstein” is typically an org-level setting, not a deployable metadata item.

ConclusionThe main deployable items you can reliably create and test in a sandbox, and then migrate to Production, are:

Custom Fields (Issue, Resolution, Summary).

A Quick Action that updates those fields.

Page Layout Change to include the Wrap Up component.

Therefore, Option C is correct and focuses on actions that are truly deployable as metadata from a sandbox to Production.

Salesforce AI Specialist References & Documents

Salesforce Trailhead: Work Summaries with Einstein GPTProvides an overview of how to configure Work Summaries, including the need for custom fields, quick actions, and UI components.

Salesforce Documentation: Deploying Metadata Between OrgsExplains what can and cannot be deployed via change sets (e.g., custom fields, page layouts, quick actions vs. user permission set assignments).

Salesforce AI Specialist Study GuideOutlines which Einstein Generative AI and Work Summaries configurations are deployable as metadata.

Context of the QuestionUniversal Containers (UC) uses Agentforce, a specialized AI-driven assistant for Salesforce. A user reports that an Agent is unable to delete recent activities.

Why Agentforce Cannot Delete Records

Agentforce’s Standard Actions: Agentforce typically has predefined or “standard” actions like Create, Update, or Summarize records. However, a standard Delete Record action is not part of the default set of Agentforce actions.

Implication: If Agentforce has no built-in delete functionality, it cannot remove activities—even if the user has permission to delete them in the Salesforce UI.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A – Permission to Delete the User’s Records: Standard Salesforce user permissions do not automatically extend to Agentforce’s capabilities. Even if the user can delete records, that doesn’t grant Agentforce a new action.

Option B – Agentforce Delete Record Action Permission: There is no separate “Delete Record Action permission” for Agentforce to be toggled. The relevant issue is that the standard Delete Record action does not exist within Agentforce out of the box.

ConclusionThe core reason for the issue is that Agentforce does not support a standard Delete Record action (Choice C).

Salesforce AI Specialist References & Documents

Salesforce Official Documentation – Agentforce(Note: Agentforce may be a pilot or specialized feature; check pilot release notes or official docs for standard actions.)

Salesforce AI Specialist Study GuideCovers the limitations of certain AI-enabled features regarding record operations.

To enable Universal Containers' sales team with automatic post-call visibility into mentions of competitors, products, and custom phrases, the AI Specialist should set up Call Insights. Call Insights analyzes voice and video calls for key phrases, topics, and mentions, providing insights into critical aspects of the conversation. This feature automatically surfaces key details such as competitor mentions, product discussions, and custom phrases specified by the sales team.

Call Summaries provide a general overview of the call but do not specifically highlight keywords or topics.

Call Explorer is a tool for navigating through call data but does not focus on automatic insights.

For more information, refer to Salesforce's Call Insights documentation regarding the analysis of call content and extracting actionable information.

Einstein Trust Layer’s Toxicity Scoring categorizes content on a scale of 0 to 1, where 1 indicates the highest level of toxicity (e.g., harmful, biased, or inappropriate language). This scoring helps organizations filter unsafe AI-generated content. A score of 1 triggers mitigation actions, such as blocking the response or alerting administrators.

A score of 0 would indicate no toxicity (B is incorrect).

The scoring system does not use "least toxic" as a category (A is misleading).

The User Utterances dashboard (Option A) is the correct functionality for analyzing user inputs, requests, and queries to identify patterns and trends. This dashboard aggregates and categorizes the natural language inputs (utterances) from users, enabling the AI Specialist to:

Identify Common Queries: Surface frequently asked questions or recurring issues.

Detect Intent Patterns: Understand how users phrase requests, which helps refine intent detection models.

Improve Bot Training: Highlight gaps in training data or misclassified utterances that require adjustment.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Agent Event Logs dashboard: Focuses on agent activity (e.g., response times, resolved cases) rather than user input analysis.

C. AI Audit & Feedback Data dashboard: Tracks AI model performance, audit trails, and user feedback scores but does not directly analyze raw user utterances or queries.

References:

Salesforce Einstein AI Specialist Certification Guide: Emphasizes the User Utterances dashboard as the primary tool for analyzing user inputs to improve conversational AI.

Trailhead Module: "Einstein Bots Basics" highlights using the dashboard to refine bot training based on user interaction data.

Salesforce Help Documentation: Describes the User Utterances dashboard as critical for identifying trends in customer interactions.

When creating a custom prompt template to populate a field with generated output, the most appropriate template type is Field Generation. This template is specifically designed for generating field-specific outputs using generative AI.

Additionally, the AI Specialist must ensure that Dynamic Fields are enabled. Dynamic Fields allow the system to use real-time data inputs from related records or fields when generating content, ensuring that the AI output is contextually accurate and relevant. This is crucial when populating specific fields with AI-generated content, as it ensures the data source remains dynamic and up-to-date.

The Einstein Trust Layer will track and audit the interactions to ensure the organization can monitor AI adoption and make necessary enhancements based on AI usage patterns.

For further reading, refer to Salesforce’s guidelines on Field Generation templates and the Einstein Trust Layer.

To address the ineffectiveness of a prompt template reported by a customer, the Salesforce AI Specialist should use the Prompt Builder Scorecard (Option B). This tool is explicitly designed to evaluate and monitor prompt templates against key criteria such as relevance, accuracy, safety, and grounding. By leveraging the scorecard, the specialist can systematically identify weaknesses in the template and make data-driven refinements. While monitoring and refining based on user feedback (Option A) is a general best practice, the Prompt Builder Scorecard is Salesforce’s recommended tool for structured evaluation, aligning with documented processes for maintaining prompt effectiveness. Changing the grounding object (Option C) without proper evaluation is reactive and does not address the root cause.

References:

Salesforce Einstein AI Specialist Certification Guide: Emphasizes using the Prompt Builder Scorecard to evaluate prompts and iterate based on results.

Trailhead Module: "Einstein for Developers" highlights the scorecard as a critical tool for assessing prompt performance.

Salesforce Help Documentation: Details the Scorecard’s role in evaluating prompts against predefined criteria.

The correct answer is Field Generation because this template type is designed to dynamically populate form fields with content generated by a large language model (LLM). In this scenario, leadership wants a dynamic form field that contains a summary or description generated by AI to aid customer interactions. Additionally, they want to keep a human in the loop, meaning the generated content will likely be reviewed or edited by a person before it's finalized, which aligns with the Field Generation prompt template.

Field Generation: This prompt type allows you to generate content for specific fields in Salesforce, leveraging large language models to create dynamic and contextual information. It ensures that AI content is available within the record where needed, but it allows human oversight or review, supporting the "human-in-the-loop" strategy.

Sales Email: This prompt type is mainly used for generating email content for outreach or responses, which doesn't align directly with populating fields in a form.

Record Summary: While this option might seem close, it is typically used to summarize entire records for high-level insights rather than filling specific fields with dynamic content based on AI generation.

Salesforce AI Specialist References:

You can explore more about these prompt templates and AI capabilities through Salesforce documentation and official resources on Prompt Builder: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.prompt_builder_templates_overview.htm