Free Practice Questions for SAVE International VMA Exam

The Information Phase is the first phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, where the team gathers and understands data about the study subject, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “an effective Information Phase kickoff meeting sets the stage for the VM study by outlining the goals for the study subject and the VM study objectives, ensuring alignment among team members and stakeholders.” This involves clarifying the purpose of the study, the project’s goals (e.g., reduce costs, improve performance), and the specific objectives of the VM study (e.g., achieve 20% cost savings while maintaining function). This aligns with the primary objective of the Information Phase—to understand the subject—and ensures the team starts with a clear direction.

Option A (Discusses the challenges of the proposed VM study approach) is incorrect because, while challenges may be acknowledged, the primary focus of the kickoff is to set goals and objectives, not discuss challenges.

Option B (Outlines goals for the study subject and VM study objectives) is correct, as it matches the purpose of an effective Information Phase kickoff meeting.

Option C (Indicates the VM solutions desired by decision makers) is incorrect because solutions are developed later (e.g., in the Creativity and Development Phases), not during the Information Phase kickoff.

Option D (Describes how functions have normally been accomplished) is incorrect because this level of functional detail is addressed in the Function Analysis Phase, not the Information Phase kickoff.

In the context of Value Methodology, cost analysis often involves financial concepts to evaluate the economic impact of alternatives, including understanding the time value of money. The VMF 1 course, under Core Competency #4 (Cost Analysis), includes basic financial metrics relevant to value studies, such as discounting cash flows to assess long-term value. The nominal rate of increase in the value of money over time, after subtracting for inflation, refers to thereal discount rate. In financial terms, as per standard economic principles taught in VMF 1, the discount rate is the rate used to discount future cash flows to their present value, and thereal discount rateis the nominal discount rate adjusted for inflation (i.e., real discount rate = nominal discount rate − inflation rate). This measures the true increase in the value of money over time, excluding inflationary effects.

Option A (Simple Payback or Breakeven Point) is incorrect because payback measures the time required to recover an investment, not the rate of increase in money’s value.

Option B (Return on Investment or ROI) is incorrect because ROI measures the profitability of an investment as a percentage, not the rate of increase in money’s value over time.

Option C (Discount Rate) is correct because the real discount rate, after subtracting inflation, defines the nominal rate of increase in the value of money over time, as used in financial analyses within VM studies.

Option D (Present Worth or Net Present Value) is incorrect because NPV is the result of discounting future cash flows to their present value using a discount rate, not the rate itself.

The Miles Value Foundation, established to honor Lawrence D. Miles (the founder of Value Engineering/Value Methodology), focuses on advancing the field of Value Methodology. According to SAVE International’s documentation, the Miles Value Foundation’s primary purpose is to “promote education and research in Value Methodology to expand its application and understanding globally.” The Foundation supports initiatives like scholarships, educational resources, and outreach to increase awareness and knowledge of VM, aligning with its mission to promote VM education.

Option A (Improve VM programs) is incorrect because the Foundation’s focus is on education and research, not directly improving specific VM programs, which is more the role of organizations like SAVE International.

Option B (Manage VM certification) is incorrect because VM certification is managed by SAVE International, not the Miles Value Foundation.

Option C (Promote VM education) is correct, as it directly aligns with the Foundation’s mission to advance VM through education and research.

Option D (Conduct VM training) is incorrect because, while the Foundation may support training indirectly, its primary role is promoting education, not directly conducting training programs.

The Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan consists of six phases, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the Function Analysis Phase is considered the heart of the Value Methodology because it establishes the foundation for value improvement by identifying, classifying, and analyzing the functions of the system, which drives all subsequent phases.” Function Analysis (the second phase) defines what the system does (e.g., using verb-noun combinations, FAST diagrams) and sets the stage for generating ideas (Creativity), evaluating them (Evaluation), and developing solutions (Development). Without understanding functions, the VM process cannot effectively improve value (function/cost), making this phase central to the methodology’s success. This was alluded to in questions like 37 (FAST diagram logic) and 44 (defining functions).

Option A (Implementation) is incorrect because Implementation is a post-study activity, not a formal phase of the VM Job Plan, and not the heart of VM.

Option B (Function Analysis) is correct, as it is the foundational phase that drives the entire VM process, per SAVE International’s standards.

Option C (Creativity) is incorrect because, while important, Creativity relies on the functions identified in Function Analysis to generate ideas.

Option D (Presentation) is incorrect because Presentation is the final phase, focused on communicating results, not the core of the methodology.

Cost analysis in Value Methodology often involves financial techniques to evaluate the economic feasibility of alternatives, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #4: Cost Analysis). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the time value of money is essential in costing techniques that account for costs and benefits over time, such as Life Cycle Cost (LCC).”Life Cycle Costis defined as “the total cost of a system or product over its entire life, including acquisition, operation, maintenance, and disposal, discounted to present value using the time value of money.” The time value of money ensures that future costs and benefits are adjusted to their present value using a discount rate (as noted in Questions 6 and 7), making LCC a comprehensive method for comparing alternatives in VM studies.

Option A (Return on Investment) is incorrect because, while ROI can consider the time value of money in some calculations, it is not essential; ROI is often calculated as a simple percentage (Profit ÷ Investment).

Option B (Life Cycle Cost) is correct, as LCC inherently requires the time value of money to discount future costs to present value, ensuring a fair comparison over the project’s life.

Option C (Simple Payback) is incorrect because simple payback (as calculated in Question 26) does not account for the time value of money; it simply divides the initial investment by annual savings.

Option D (Break-even point) is incorrect because the break-even point (similar to payback) typically does not incorporate the time value of money; it focuses on the point where costs equal revenues.

Random Function Identification is a technique used in Value Methodology’s Function Analysis phase to identify and organize functions before creating a Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) diagram, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, Random Function Identification involves “listing all functions of a system or project in a table, typically including the elements (components or parts), their associated functions (in verb-noun format), and their classifications (e.g., basic, secondary, higher-order).” This table helps the VM team systematically identify and categorize functions during the early stages of analysis, ensuring all functions are captured before structuring them in a FAST diagram.

Option A (Inputs, objectives, and sequence) is incorrect because inputs and objectives are part of the Information Phase, and sequence is addressed in FAST diagramming, not in the Random Function Identification table.

Option B (Costs, time, and risks) is incorrect because these are related to cost analysis or implementation planning, not function identification.

Option C (Elements, functions, and classifications) is correct, as it aligns with the purpose of the Random Function Identification table in VM.

Option D (Components, resources, and criteria) is incorrect because resources and criteria are not part of function identification; criteria are used in the Evaluation Phase.

The diagram provided is a Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) diagram, a key tool in Value Methodology’s Function Analysis phase, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2). In FAST diagramming, the “Subject Objective” refers to the overarching goal or need that the system addresses, often aligned with the higher-order function or an external objective outside the study’s scope. According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the Subject Objective is typically the highest-level objective for which the subject scope exists, often located to the left of the left scope line, representing an external goal or assumption.” This aligns with the definition of a higher-order function but extends to the external context.

In the FAST diagram:

The scope lines are labeled B (left) and D (right), as identified in Question 30.

The critical path (horizontal) runs from E to F to G to J to L to M to N to O, with E being the higher-order function just inside the left scope line.

Functions P, Q, and R are to the left of the left scope line (B), indicating they are outside the study’s scope and represent external objectives or assumptions.

Function O is the rightmost function on the critical path, inside the scope, representing a specific outcome, not the Subject Objective.

The Subject Objective is the broadest external goal, often the “why” behind the higher-order function (E). Among P, Q, and R,Function Pis the leftmost, directly to the left of the left scope line (B), making it the most likely candidate for the Subject Objective, as it represents the ultimate external goal driving the system (e.g., a customer need like “enhance security” for a door system).

Option A (Function P) is correct, as it is to the left of the left scope line, aligning with the definition of a Subject Objective.

Option B (Function Q) is incorrect because Q is further to the left but not as directly tied to the scope line as P, which is the primary external objective.

Option C (Function R) is incorrect for the same reason as Q; it is external but not the primary Subject Objective.

Option D (Function O) is incorrect because O is inside the scope, on the critical path, representing a specific outcome, not the Subject Objective.

Risk management is a critical aspect of Implementation Planning in Value Methodology (VM), as it ensures that VM proposals can be successfully executed, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #8: Implementation Planning). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “risks associated with a project, product, or process typically impact schedule, cost, or performance.” This is often referred to as the “project management triangle” or “triple constraint,” a fundamental concept in project management that VM adopts when assessing risks during the Development and Presentation Phases.

Schedule: Risks that cause delays (e.g., late delivery of materials).

Cost: Risks that increase expenses (e.g., unexpected cost overruns).

Performance: Risks that affect quality or functionality (e.g., a proposed solution failing to meet requirements).

The VMF 1 curriculum emphasizes that VM teams must identify and mitigate risks in these three areas to ensure the feasibility of their recommendations, making this the most relevant framework for understanding risk impacts in a VM context.

Option A (Schedule, cost, or performance) is correct, as it directly aligns with the standard risk impact areas in VM and project management.

Option B (Cost, requirements, or results) is incorrect because, while cost is relevant, “requirements” and “results” are less specific than “schedule” and “performance” in the context of VM risk management.

Option C (Resources, regulations, or time) is incorrect because, while time (schedule) is relevant, resources and regulations are more specific factors that contribute to broader impacts on schedule, cost, or performance.

Option D (Time, function, or attributes) is incorrect because, while time (schedule) is relevant, “function” and “attributes” are not standard risk impact categories in VM; performance is the broader term used.