Free Practice Questions for PMI PMP Exam

When facing challenges with virtual team members being unable to join regular project update meetings, the immediate corrective action should involve direct communication with those team members to understand their constraints and revise the communications management plan accordingly. This approach is proactive and collaborative, aiming to find a feasible solution that accommodates the diverse locations and schedules of the team members, ensuring that everyone can participate in the project updates234.

In situations where a stakeholder objects to a project, it is crucial for the project manager to assess the impact of the stakeholder’s concerns and engage with them properly. This involves understanding the stakeholder’s perspective, the reasons behind their objections, and the potential influence they have on the project. By doing so, the project manager can address the concerns in a manner that respects the stakeholder’s legacy ties while also guiding the project towards its objectives. Effective stakeholder engagement is a key aspect of project management and business analysis, as it helps in managing expectations, resolving conflicts, and ensuring that all parties are aligned with the project’s goals.

(Project Management Institute. (n.d.). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition; Project Management Institute. (n.d.). PMI’s Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)®.)

In agile project management, when a new technology is introduced and results in a decrease in team velocity, it is essential to use retrospectives to analyze the situation. Retrospectives allow the team to reflect on what has happened, identify any skill gaps, and understand the impact of the new technology on the project’s schedule. This understanding can then be used to make necessary adjustments to the team composition or process to improve velocity1.

Increasing Your Scrum Team’s Velocity — ClearlyAgile1.

When faced with a situation where a team member often disagrees with the project manager and refuses to implement decisions, it is crucial for the project manager to engage in conflict resolution by understanding the team member’s perspective. This involves identifying the root causes of the disagreement and working collaboratively to find a solution that aligns with the project’s goals while addressing the team member’s concerns. This approach not only resolves the current conflict but also strengthens team cohesion and prevents future disagreements.

Integrating a new team member into an iterative project requires a supportive approach that ensures they understand the processes and can contribute effectively. Allocating time within the iterations for mentoring allows the new member to learn the necessary skills and processes in a structured manner. This aligns with the PMBOK® Guide’s principles of project team management and development, which emphasize the importance of continuous learning and improvement within the team. Mentoring provides a practical way to facilitate this learning, helping the new member to integrate into the team’s workflow without negatively impacting the schedule1.

Mentoring - Key Competency for Program and Project Professionals - PMI1.

 When a project deliverable is not fulfilling the business case requirement, it is important for the project manager to understand why this is happening. Analyzing the business benefits criteria and assumptions (Option C) can help identify if there were any discrepancies or misunderstandings in the initial planning stages. This could include reassessing the expected benefits, costs, risks, and strategic alignment of the project.

Additionally, scheduling a project review meeting to analyze the root cause (Option E) can provide valuable insights into what went wrong. This could involve discussions with the project team, stakeholders, and possibly the operations team who are now handling the deliverable. The goal of this meeting would be to understand the root cause of the issue and to identify potential solutions or improvements for future projects.

= Project Management Institute’s Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 6th Edition1; Unito’s guide on Project Deliverables2.

The best course of action for the project manager in this situation is to review the stakeholder’s communication requirements. This aligns with the principles of stakeholder engagement and communication management in project management. By reviewing the communication requirements, the project manager can ensure that the information needs of the stakeholder are being met without causing undue disruption to the team’s work. This may involve adjusting the communication plan to provide the stakeholder with the necessary updates in a manner that is less intrusive to the team member’s workflow.

= The answer is verified by the principles found in the PMBOK® Guide, which emphasizes the importance of managing stakeholder expectations through effective communication strategies1. Additionally, the Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials supports the approach of tailoring communication to meet the needs of stakeholders2.

As a servant leader, the project manager should continue iterating and monitoring quality aspects sprint by sprint1. This approach aligns with the principles of servant leadership, which emphasize the importance of communication, risk management, and proactive problem-solving2345. It also encourages a focus on delivering value, rather than simply meeting predefined targets2345. References: PMI, PMTraining, Business Analyst Learnings, Project Insight, Project Management Academy

 When a team member is struggling with a task, it is beneficial to leverage the experience within the team to provide support. This not only aids in the completion of the task but also contributes to the development of the less experienced team member’s skills. By asking a more experienced team member to assist, the project manager fosters a collaborative environment where knowledge sharing is encouraged, and team members can learn from one another. This approach aligns with the PMBOK® Guide’s emphasis on team development and the PMI’s focus on continuous learning and improvement within project teams.

The approach of having an experienced team member support another is consistent with the principles outlined in the PMBOK® Guide, which advocates for project managers to develop their team’s competencies and enhance overall team performance. Additionally, the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) reference materials highlight the importance of collaboration and knowledge transfer in project environments to ensure that all team members are equipped to contribute effectively to project objectives.

The best course of action in this scenario is for the project manager to seek interim funding approval from an authority within the project governance structure, such as the project director. This approach allows for the continuation of critical project activities without delay, which is essential given the expedited schedule of the project. Once interim approval is granted, the project manager should then bring this interim approval to the investment committee’s attention at the next meeting for formal acknowledgment and inclusion in the project’s funding records.

The answer is verified by the principles outlined in the PMBOK® Guide, which emphasizes the importance of maintaining project continuity and the role of the project governance in facilitating necessary approvals for project progression. The PMBOK® Guide also discusses the project manager’s responsibility to communicate with stakeholders and manage project constraints, including schedule and funding. The Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) reference materials further support this approach by highlighting the need for effective stakeholder engagement and decision-making processes within project management practices.

 The project manager should engage with the functional managers to ensure that the team members’ work on the transformation project is recognized in their performance plans. This alignment is crucial for maintaining motivation and ensuring that the team members’ contributions to the project are acknowledged in their annual reviews. It’s important to align individual performance plans with the project’s objectives to ensure that all team members are working towards the same goals and that their efforts are evaluated appropriately.

Conflict resolution is a critical skill in project management. The PMBOK Guide suggests that conflicts should be addressed using a problem-solving approach, which involves direct confrontation and working collaboratively to identify a solution that satisfies all parties1. This aligns with the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) guidelines, which recommend discussion and negotiation among conflicting parties to reach an agreeable solution3. Ignoring the problem or delaying action (options A and C) can lead to a decrease in team morale and productivity, while escalating the issue to HR (option D) should be a last resort after other methods have failed. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition; PMI-PBA Handbook; Adaptive US Blog on Conflict Resolution Techniques for Business Analysts123.

In the context of a product development project, planning for continuous validation is crucial to ensure that the product meets the required quality standards and to prevent major issues that could lead to rework and delays. Continuous validation involves regular checks and assessments throughout the product development lifecycle, which helps in identifying and addressing quality issues early on. This proactive approach aligns with the PMBOK guide’s emphasis on quality management and the iterative nature of agile methodologies, which advocate for ongoing evaluation and adaptation.

PMBOK® Guide - Sixth Edition

The PMI Guide to Business Analysis

Best practices in resolving quality issues in product development as outlined in various professional resources.

 In an agile project, it’s important to manage ad hoc requests and meetings effectively1. When the project owner repeatedly calls for ad hoc meetings, it can disrupt the team’s workflow and productivity2. Therefore, the project manager should coach the project owner about the implications of unplanned meetings1. This includes explaining how these meetings can affect the team’s focus, productivity, and the overall project timeline1. The project manager can also suggest alternative ways to communicate or schedule these meetings in a way that minimizes disruption to the team34. References: 

https://www.projectmanager.com/blog/project-meetings-for-your-team

https://www.range.co/blog/ad-hoc-meetings

The project manager should first seek to understand how the project aligns with the strategic objectives of the business. This involves engaging with the project sponsor to clarify the strategic benefits and ensure that the project will deliver value in line with the business’s goals. This approach is consistent with the PMI’s guidance, which emphasizes the importance of aligning projects with an organization’s strategy and objectives to ensure that they contribute to its success.

In Agile project management, it is crucial to address issues as they arise, particularly when an iteration is nearing completion and the team is struggling with user stories. The first step should be to meet with the project team to understand the challenges they are facing and collaboratively develop a resolution. This approach is supported by the principles of Agile, which emphasize team collaboration, regular communication, and adaptive planning to overcome obstacles1. By engaging the team directly, the project manager can facilitate problem-solving and ensure that the team’s insights and suggestions are incorporated into the solution.

The project manager should use a hybrid model to combine predictive and adaptive life cycles. This approach allows for the initial planning and structure of the predictive approach while also incorporating the flexibility of the adaptive approach to respond to changes and new information. The hybrid approach is beneficial in scenarios where the project has clear phases but also requires adaptability to changing requirements and inputs from stakeholders.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, effective communication with stakeholders is crucial for project success. The project manager should assess all project stakeholders to understand their information needs and preferences. This involves documenting their preferred methods of communication and the frequency with which they wish to receive updates. By doing so, the project manager ensures that all stakeholders are kept informed in a manner that suits them, which can help prevent issues like stakeholders not receiving progress updates123456.

The success of virtual teams largely depends on regular communication and the establishment of a strong sense of community among team members. Planning regular virtual meetings is a best practice for managing virtual project teams, as it helps to motivate and support the team, fosters collaboration, and keeps team members engaged1. This approach aligns with the principles of both Project Management and Business Analysis, which emphasize the importance of stakeholder engagement and team dynamics for project success2. References:

Best practices for managing and developing virtual project teams1.

Managing Virtual Teams for High Performance2.

 When missing requirements specifications are identified during the design phase, the project manager should meet with the development team to review and assess the requirements. This collaborative approach ensures that all team members are aware of the discrepancies and can contribute to finding a solution. It is also aligned with the PMBOK® Guide’s emphasis on engaging stakeholders and maintaining open communication throughout the project lifecycle. By assessing the requirements with the team, the project manager can ensure that the project remains aligned with its objectives while addressing the gaps in the specifications.

The project manager is in the middle of the project, which is divided into five iterations. Each user story is worth $50, so the total budget for the project is $50 * 100 = $5000. The actual expenditure so far is $200, and 50 user stories have been delivered. This means that the project has spent less than the budgeted amount for the 50 user stories ($50 * 50 = $2500), so it is under budget. Since the project is in the middle and has delivered half of the user stories, it is on schedule.

The Project Management Professional (PMP)® Certification from PMI1, PMP Examination Content Outline - June 2019 - Project Management Institute2, Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials3.

 When a project manager joins a project midway and identifies issues with dependencies and communication, the first step should be to consult the communications management plan. This plan outlines how project communications will be planned, structured, implemented, and monitored for effectiveness1. It includes key points such as defining the audience, requirements, and communications schedule, which are essential for ensuring that all team members are adequately informed of impacting changes1. By consulting this plan, the project manager can address the communication issues systematically and align with the established project management practices.

 In the context of PMP, when a project encounters technical impediments that could potentially delay deliverables, it is crucial to document and track these issues formally. Updating the issue log is a standard practice in project management, as it ensures that all stakeholders are aware of the impediments and the actions being taken to resolve them. This approach aligns with the principles of communication and transparency in project management, as outlined in the PMBOK® Guide and other PMP reference materials. It allows for a structured method to prioritize and address the issues, facilitating better decision-making and resource allocation to resolve the impediments1.

When an unexpected change or constraint arises during execution, the project manager should first assess the impact. The development team is closest to the technical implications, and their analysis will guide decisions about alternatives, scheduling, or risk.

Per the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition (Risk and Delivery Performance Domains), impact analysis is a key first step before escalating, updating risk logs, or brainstorming new paths forward.

Option A is premature before understanding the scope of impact.

Option C is about risk documentation, but this situation already materialized.

Option D is part of response planning, not the first action.

In the absence of an existing knowledge management system, the project manager should coordinate with the team and stakeholders to collect the necessary knowledge. This approach ensures that all relevant information is captured and made available for the project’s needs. It aligns with the principles of knowledge management in project management, which emphasize the importance of gathering, organizing, sharing, and analyzing knowledge to support project success1.

Since the requested change implies a complete shift in direction and scope, the business case must be updated to reflect the new strategic goals. The business case justifies the project’s existence, and updating it ensures all stakeholders are aligned before initiating a new scope or restarting the project.

Option A is reactive and premature without business justification.

Option B is tactical and may follow later.

Option C bypasses critical governance and approval processes.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

When stakeholders are misaligned in expectations or outcomes, the best approach is to facilitate a collaborative discussion, such as a workshop. This helps reach consensus on project goals, aligns expectations early, and ensures shared ownership moving forward.

A may be helpful, but stakeholder alignment is the project manager's responsibility.

B may come too late without first ensuring alignment.

C provides one-way communication rather than engagement.

D is correct as it fosters collaboration and clarity.

When future performance is expected to continue at the same cost efficiency (CPI), the formula to calculate Estimate at Completion (EAC) is:

EAC = BAC / CPI

Step 1:

CPI = EV / AC = 145 / 170 ≈ 0.8529

Step 2:

EAC = 285 / 0.8529 ≈ 334 person/day

Thus, the correct estimate at completion is approximately 334 person/day.

Option B is the original BAC and does not reflect cost inefficiency.

Options C and D are incorrect based on the formula and data provided.

When team engagement issues arise, especially in virtual environments, it is crucial to reflect with the team on whether agreed-upon practices (cadence, structure, tools) are still effective. This supports continuous improvement, a core Agile and PMI principle. Working with the team promotes psychological safety and empowers them to propose better formats for collaboration.

PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition emphasizes team performance and tailoring practices to context. Agile environments also promote retrospective thinking to improve team dynamics.

Option B addresses accountability but doesn’t resolve disengagement.

Option C is a good practice but doesn’t tackle underlying disengagement.

Option D focuses on reporting structure, not team dynamics.

During execution, any addition to scope must go through the formal change control process. The project manager should initiate a change request for proper evaluation and approval. This ensures that scope, budget, and schedule impacts are assessed before proceeding.

According to the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition, any changes to the baseline during execution must follow the change control procedures defined in the governance structure.

Option A risks scope creep.

Option B is helpful but not sufficient as a next step.

Option C closes the door without considering the critical nature of the request.

In Scrum, the product owner is the sole person responsible for managing the product backlog. When a customer requests new features mid-sprint, it is inappropriate to add them directly to the sprint. The correct procedure is to have the Scrum Master direct the customer to the product owner, who will evaluate the request and decide whether to include it in the product backlog for future prioritization.

According to the Agile Practice Guide and the Scrum Guide, only the product owner has the authority to accept or reject items in the product backlog. The Scrum Master facilitates communication and protects the team from scope creep during the sprint.

Option A (Definition of Done) is useful for clarifying quality, not for managing scope changes.

Option C (Acceptance criteria) applies to existing backlog items, not new feature requests.

Option D (Backlog prioritization) is the product owner’s job and only happens after the sprint, not mid-sprint.

When a requirement arises during project execution that affects scope, schedule, or budget, the project manager must follow formal change control procedures. Procuring a server that was not part of the original baseline constitutes a change. Therefore, the correct action is to raise a change request and obtain approval before proceeding.

Option A bypasses change control protocols, which may lead to governance or audit issues.

Option B shifts the cost improperly without formal agreement.

Option C assumes the change is covered under contingency without verification.