Free Practice Questions for PMI PMI-RMP Exam

According to the PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)® Examination Content Outline1, one of the tasks in the domain of Risk Response is to recommend risk response strategies based on the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization and stakeholders1. One of the strategies for negative risks or threats is risk acceptance, which involves acknowledging the existence of a threat and making a conscious decision to accept it without taking any action2. In this scenario, the risk manager should recommend risk acceptance for the risk items that would be detrimental to project success, but the associated triggers cannot be managed by the organization and are unlikely to occur. Risk acceptance is appropriate when the risk exposure is low, the cost of other responses is high, or the risk response is outside the scope or influence of the project3. The risk manager should not recommend risk mitigation, which involves reducing the probability and/or impact of a threat2. The risk manager should not recommend risk enhancement, which is a strategy for positive risks or opportunities, not negative risks or threats2. The risk manager should not recommend risk exploitation, which is also a strategy for positive risks or opportunities, not negative risks or threats2. References: 1: PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)® Examination Content Outline, page 102: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, page 4363: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, page 437.

The project manager should discuss the identified risks with the project team to ensure that everyone is aware of the potential risks and can provide input on the likelihood and impact of each risk. This collaborative approach will help in developing a comprehensive risk management plan.

The project manager should discuss and evaluate the identified risks with the project team, as this is part of the risk identification process. The project manager can use their experience from previous projects to identify potential risks that may occur again on the new project, but they should also involve the project team to obtain their input and perspectives. The project team can help the project manager to validate, refine, and prioritize the identified risks, as well as to suggest possible risk responses. The project manager should document the identified risks and their characteristics in the risk register, which is a tool for risk management. The other options are not appropriate actions for the project manager to take. Implementing the risk response strategies into the risk plan is premature, as the project manager should first analyze and evaluate the risks before deciding on the best response strategies. Informing the sponsor that these risks should be added according to experience is not sufficient, as the project manager should also consult the project team and other stakeholders to ensure that all relevant risks are identified and assessed. Adding the risks to the risk register and determining a contingency is part of the risk analysis and response planning processes, which come after the risk identification process. The project manager should first discuss and evaluate the identified risks with the project team before moving to the next steps of risk management. References: 2, 3, [5]

Setting risk thresholds in collaboration with stakeholders ensures clarity on what is considered tolerable risk. PMBOK® Guide and ISO 31000 state:

"Risk thresholds reflect the degree of risk that stakeholders are willing to accept. These should be defined collaboratively at the start of the project."

— PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 11.1

"The organization should define its risk criteria and thresholds, in consultation with stakeholders."

— ISO 31000:2018, Section 6.3

When stakeholders propose removing the extra days allocated to critical activities (often referred to as padding or contingency), it is crucial first to review the risk response plan. The risk response plan is designed to address how the project will handle uncertainties that might affect the project schedule. Removing these extra days without reviewing the risk response plan could expose the project to significant risks, especially if those days were added to mitigate specific identified risks.

According to PMI's Risk Management guidelines and best practices outlined in the project risk management procedures, the risk response plan should be reviewed first to understand the implications of removing the additional time. This step ensures that the decision is informed and that the project does not inadvertently increase its risk exposure by removing contingency that was strategically placed to address potential issues.

This approach aligns with the proactive management of risks, ensuring that any changes to the project schedule are made with a full understanding of their impact on the project's risk profile​.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Section 11.4.3.1, Risk Thresholds, risk thresholds are the level of risk exposure above which risks are addressed and below which risks may be accepted. Risk thresholds are determined by the organization’s risk appetite, which is the degree of uncertainty that an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its goals. Therefore, when the project manager is informed by the risk owner that the exposure from two high-impact risks are hitting the risk thresholds, the project manager should complete an assessment and confirm the response with the sponsors, who are the key stakeholders for the project and have a low risk appetite. The project manager should not update the project management plan, perform an assumptions and constraints analysis, or implement mitigation measures without first consulting with the sponsors and obtaining their approval. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Section 11.4.3.1, Risk Thresholds

Biases during risk identification can skew the perception of potential risks and their triggers. To mitigate this, the risk manager should rely on objective data, such as published operational experience reports, which provide historical data and insights into what has triggered risks in similar projects. This approach reduces the influence of biases and ensures that risk identification is based on empirical evidence rather than subjective judgments. Using these reports aligns with best practices in risk management, where decisions are data-driven and supported by documented experiences, reducing the likelihood of overlooking critical risk triggers​​.

To mitigate the chance of the same issues reoccurring, the risk manager should document the known risk triggers as identified cost and schedule risks in the risk register. By doing so, these risks are formally recognized, and appropriate responses can be planned and monitored. This approach ensures that the lessons learned from the previous project are incorporated into the risk management plan for the upcoming project, reducing the likelihood of similar issues occurring.

When stakeholders are concerned about the potential impact of a project, such as staff reductions, the risk manager should perform a stakeholder analysis. This analysis will help identify the stakeholders’ interests, their levels of influence, and how their concerns should be addressed in the project plan. By understanding these factors, the project team can develop strategies to engage stakeholders effectively, address their concerns, and increase project support. PMI emphasizes the importance of stakeholder analysis in risk management as it helps in aligning stakeholder expectations with project goals​​.

The project manager should reassess the risks and analyze the reserve to determine if any adjustments can be made to accommodate the expected additional work. This will help in identifying potential budget-saving measures and making informed decisions on how to proceed.

According to the PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) Reference Materials, risk reassessment is the process of reanalyzing existing project risks and identifying new risks throughout the project life cycle1. Reserve analysis is the process of estimating the amount of contingency reserve and management reserve needed to account for the uncertainty and variability of the project2. In this case, the project manager should conduct a risk reassessment and reserve analysis as the next step, because the budget overruns during execution have changed the risk profile of the project and reduced the available funds to handle future risks. By conducting a risk reassessment, the project manager can update the risk register and the risk response plan with the current status of the project risks and the effectiveness of the risk responses. By conducting a reserve analysis, the project manager can determine if the remaining contingency reserve and management reserve are sufficient to cover the potential impact of the project risks, and request additional funds if needed.

The risk manager should review the agreed-upon risk tolerance to determine the correct limit for continuing construction based on the chance of rain. Risk tolerance is the level of risk an organization is willing to accept and should be established during the risk management planning process.

 Risk tolerance is the degree of uncertainty that a stakeholder is willing to accept in respect to a negative outcome on a project objective. Risk tolerance can be expressed as a percentage, a range, a value, or a qualitative statement. Risk tolerance should be agreed upon by the project team and the stakeholders at the beginning of the project, and documented in the risk management plan. The risk manager should review the agreed-upon risk tolerance to find out the correct limit for the rain probability that would affect the construction activity. This would help to resolve the conflicting opinions of the stakeholders and ensure that the risk management decisions are aligned with the project objectives and expectations. Reviewing the agreed-upon risk tolerance is the best option among the choices given, as it is the most relevant and reliable source of information for the risk manager. Performing a sensitivity analysis, finding out the stakeholders’ risk appetite, or using industry standard risk thresholds are not as effective or appropriate ways of finding out the correct limit, as they do not reflect the specific agreement and context of the project. References: PMI-RMP® Certification Handbook1, page 9; PMBOK® Guide, pages 414-415.