Free Practice Questions for PMI PMI-ACP Exam

The correct answer is C — Ask the team member to update daily progress on the information radiators.

In Agile, transparency and self-organization are key. Information radiators (e.g., task boards, digital dashboards) allow all team members and stakeholders to see the current state of work at any time. If a team member cannot attend stand-ups, they should still update their tasks on the board so that others are informed.

PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Information radiators ensure transparent communication of progress, risks, and blockers to all team members and stakeholders. These should be updated in real-time or daily by those responsible.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.6 – Information Radiators)

Mike Griffiths:

“Task boards and progress charts allow anyone to see project status without waiting for meetings. Team members must take responsibility for keeping them current.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Incorrect options:

A punishes the team for one member’s lack of participation and doesn’t solve the communication issue.

B reintroduces a command-and-control model, reducing team ownership.

D is dishonest and violates agile principles of transparency.

Answer: C

—

In Scrum, teams are self-organizing, meaning they are responsible for managing internal dynamics and conflicts. The scrum master should act as a servant leader by facilitating conflict resolution rather than imposing decisions.

The scrum master should mediate the situation by fostering open communication and helping the team address concerns constructively.

Encouraging team collaboration and respectful communication is key to maintaining morale.

Escalating to senior management or removing a team member should be a last resort.

Attending meetings does not directly resolve the issue but can help the scrum master observe and intervene when necessary.

By facilitating conflict resolution and supporting team self-organization, the scrum master ensures a healthy and productive work environment.

The correct answer is A – Refocus the sprint review meetings to demonstrate working software and seek feedback on the product.

Sprint reviews are designed to showcase the completed product increment to stakeholders and receive feedback. The primary goal is to validate that the work delivered provides value to the customer—not to present technical details. Demonstrating working software is one of the core tenets of Agile.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Sprint reviews are working sessions designed to elicit feedback and foster collaboration. Teams demonstrate completed work and adjust the backlog based on stakeholder input.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Value Delivery)

Mike Griffiths confirms:

“The output of every iteration should be potentially shippable product. The sprint review is for stakeholders to see that output and provide feedback to inform future development.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 2 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Other options explained:

B may be helpful, but it doesn’t solve the immediate issue of misaligned sprint reviews.

C misunderstands the purpose of the sprint review—it’s not about architecture.

D changes the audience instead of correcting the approach.

Answer: A

══════════

The correct answer is C – The team should discuss their definition of done (DoD) and make changes to ensure there is common understanding of the acceptance criteria.

A shared understanding of what “done” means ensures consistent quality across team members. When this understanding is missing, defects and inconsistencies arise. The Definition of Done (DoD) should be reviewed and updated collaboratively to set a clear standard for completeness and quality.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“The Definition of Done provides a shared understanding of when work is complete. This includes quality criteria, testing, and documentation. It should be revisited regularly to maintain alignment.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.2 – Definition of Done)

Mike Griffiths emphasizes:

“Quality issues often result from unclear or inconsistent DoD. Revisiting and refining it ensures consistent expectations across the team.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Why the other options are incorrect:

A (TDD) may help, but won’t solve the fundamental alignment issue.

B accepts a problem without resolving it.

D imposes a process without team collaboration, which is not agile.

Answer: C

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

After the product vision is communicated, the product owner should ensure that the product backlog is prioritized so the team can focus on delivering the most valuable features first. According to the PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.1 Product Backlog and Vision Alignment), prioritizing the backlog helps teams understand the product roadmap and plan their efforts accordingly.

Mike Griffiths in the PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Adaptive Planning) reinforces that the product owner’s key responsibility is backlog prioritization, not task management or detailed design.

Option C is correct: prioritizing the backlog enables the team to understand and plan the roadmap.

Option A and B are too detailed for the product owner and move into the team ' s domain.

Option D is a team responsibility, not the product owner’s.

The correct answer is D — Iteration Burndown Chart.

An iteration burndown chart provides daily updates about the team’s progress during an iteration (or sprint). It tracks the remaining work in the sprint backlog and helps both the team and stakeholders assess if the sprint goal is likely to be met. This visualization helps communicate real-time progress to key stakeholders and supports adaptive planning.

PMI Agile Practice Guide states:

“Burndown charts display work remaining in a timebox and are updated daily. They are effective for communicating iteration progress to the team and stakeholders.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.6, Information Radiators)

PMBOK® Guide (6th Edition) and Mike Griffiths both emphasize using task boards and burndown charts as “information radiators” for transparency.

Mike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book elaborates:

“Iteration burndown charts are the most widely used artifact to track sprint progress. They offer insight into how much work remains and signal whether the team is on track to meet its sprint goal.”

Options A and B are long-term planning tools. Option C (velocity) is a forecasting metric and not updated daily.

Answer: D

=================================

Kaizen is a Japanese term that means " continuous improvement, " which is a fundamental principle in Agile. It focuses on making incremental, continuous improvements to enhance processes and quality. Standup meetings and retrospective meetings are common Agile practices that support Kaizen. Standup meetings provide a daily check-in to ensure the team is aligned, while retrospectives allow the team to reflect on the sprint, identify areas for improvement, and make adjustments. Continuous improvement is at the core of Kaizen, and these practices enable the team to refine their processes over time, leading to better product quality and customer satisfaction.

The correct answer is C — The stakeholders will learn whether or not the implementation has worked by getting immediate feedback so they can correct their assumptions for the next sprint.

Agile welcomes stakeholder involvement throughout the project lifecycle. Demos (also called sprint reviews) are critical opportunities for stakeholders to inspect the product increment and provide feedback, which helps teams pivot or adapt early and often. Immediate feedback reduces the risk of building features that do not meet business needs.

PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Iteration reviews/demos provide stakeholders with the opportunity to see working product increments and offer feedback while there is still time to make changes.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.7 – Reviews and Demos)

Mike Griffiths supports this by stating:

“Engaging stakeholders during sprint reviews allows assumptions to be challenged early. This feedback loop ensures value alignment and reduces the likelihood of rework.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 3 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Other options:

A incorrectly distances stakeholders from essential agile feedback cycles.

B shifts focus away from value to effort-based metrics.

D is more about long-term ROI, not immediate iterative feedback.

Answer: C

—

The project lead should focus on creating a safe environment where all team members feel comfortable expressing their opinions without fear of judgment or repercussions. This can be achieved by encouraging open communication, showing appreciation for diverse perspectives, and actively ensuring that everyone ' s voice is heard. A safe environment fosters trust and collaboration, which is essential for the team ' s success. While other options may help in certain contexts, building a culture of safety and trust is the most effective long-term strategy to encourage team members to speak up.

The agile lead is emphasizing the importance of creating a safe environment for disagreement, which encourages constructive conflict. In Agile, this is crucial because it allows team members to openly express differing opinions and perspectives. Such discussions often lead to better decision-making by surfacing various viewpoints and potential solutions. When teams feel safe to disagree, it fosters creativity, innovation, and problem-solving without fear of retribution. This aligns with Agile principles of collaboration, transparency, and continuous improvement.