Free Practice Questions for Nutanix NCP-US-6.10 Exam

To address space constraints on a Nutanix Files instance in a cluster where compression is already enabled and data cannot be deleted, the administrator should useSmart Tiering. Smart Tiering, enabled through Nutanix Data Lens, allows the administrator to tier infrequently accessed (cold) data from the Nutanix Files instance to a secondary storage tier, such as a cloud-based object store (e.g., AWS S3), thereby freeing up space on the primary cluster without deleting data.

TheNutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA)course explains that “Smart Tiering, managed via Nutanix Data Lens, enables Nutanix Files to offload cold data to a secondary storage tier, such as cloud storage, to alleviate space constraints while maintaining data accessibility.” This feature uses lifecycle policies to identify data that has not been accessed for a specified period and moves it to a cost-effective tier, reducing the storage footprint on the primary cluster.

TheNutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US)study guide further states that “Smart Tiering is an effective solution for managing space constraints in Nutanix Files by tiering cold data to external storage, such as AWS S3, while keeping the data accessible to users through a unified namespace.” This approach is ideal for the scenario, as it addresses the space issue without requiring data deletion, and it works even when compression is already enabled.

The other options are incorrect:

Smart DR: Smart DR is a disaster recovery feature for Nutanix Files that replicates data between sites for failover and recovery. It does not reduce space usage on the primary cluster, as it creates a copy of the data on the secondary site.

Object Replication: Object Replication is a feature of Nutanix Objects, not Nutanix Files, and it focuses on replicating object store buckets, not file shares, to another site.

Smart Sync: Smart Sync is not a Nutanix feature; it may refer to third-party tools or unrelated functionalities and is not applicable here.

The NUSA course documentation emphasizes that “Smart Tiering with Nutanix Data Lens provides a seamless way to manage space constraints in Nutanix Files by offloading cold data to secondary storage, ensuring efficient use of primary cluster resources.”

Smart DR(Disaster Recovery) for Nutanix Files ensures that the file server VMs (FSVMs) at therecovery sitemirror the configuration of the primary site. Specifically, it requires that:

“The number of FSVMs deployed at the recovery site mustmatchthe number of FSVMs at the primary site.”

The primary site has3 FSVMs.

Therefore, the recovery site must also have3 FSVMsdeployed to ensure consistency and proper operation of Smart DR for file services.

The question refers to a “delay time” in the context of Nutanix Unified Storage, but without specific context, I will assume it relates to a common scenario in Nutanix Files or Objects, such as ransomware protection or anomaly detection in File Analytics, where a delay time is often used to manage alerts or actions. The most applicable term in this context isCool Off interval, which is used in Nutanix File Analytics to define the delay time between successive alerts for the same anomaly to prevent alert flooding.

TheNutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA)course states, “In File Analytics, the Cool Off interval is a configurable delay time that specifies the minimum period between consecutive alerts for the same anomaly, preventing excessive notifications for recurring issues.” For example, if File Analytics detects a potential ransomware attack (e.g., mass file renaming), the Cool Off interval ensures that the system does not send repeated alerts for the same issue within a short timeframe, allowing administrators to focus on resolving the problem without being overwhelmed by notifications.

TheNutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US)study guide further elaborates that “the Cool Off interval in File Analytics is a delay time used to manage anomaly alerts, ensuring that notifications are sent at reasonable intervals to avoid alert fatigue.” This feature is critical for monitoring scenarios like ransomware detection, where rapid file operations might otherwise trigger excessive alerts.

The other options are incorrect in this context:

Quarantine: Quarantine refers to isolating files or clients (e.g., in ransomware protection), not a delay time.

Locked State: Locked State is not a term used in Nutanix Files or Objects for a delay time; it might refer to a WORM-locked object but does not fit a delay context.

Retention Period: Retention Period refers to the duration data is kept (e.g., in WORM or snapshots), not a delay between actions like alerts.

If the “delay time” refers to a different context (e.g., WORM retention in Nutanix Objects), the answer might be Retention Period, but the Cool Off interval in File Analytics is the most fitting based on typical usage in monitoring scenarios.

The NUSA course documentation emphasizes that “the Cool Off interval is the delay time used in File Analytics to manage the frequency of anomaly alerts, ensuring effective monitoring without overwhelming administrators.”

Standard tiering policies for Nutanix Unified Storage are managed inNutanix Data Lens. Nutanix Data Lens is a cloud-based service that provides data lifecycle management, analytics, and tiering capabilities for Nutanix Files and Objects. It enables administrators to define and manage tiering policies to move data between different storage tiers (e.g., from Nutanix storage to cloud storage like AWS S3) based on access patterns, age, or other criteria.

According to theNutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA)course, “Nutanix Data Lens is used to configure and manage standard tiering policies for Nutanix Files and Objects, allowing data to be tiered to cost-effective storage based on predefined rules.” This includes setting policies to archive infrequently accessed data to cloud storage, optimizing storage costs while maintaining accessibility.

TheNutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US)study guide further clarifies that “Data Lens provides a centralized interface for managing tiering policies, enabling automated data movement to secondary storage tiers, such as cloud-based object stores.” Administrators can access Data Lens to define rules for data tiering, monitor tiering activities, and ensure compliance with organizational data management requirements.

The other options are incorrect:

Prism Central Admin Dashboard: Prism Central is used for cluster management, monitoring, and orchestration but does not provide specific interfaces for managing tiering policies.

Prism Element Data Protection Dashboard: Prism Element focuses on individual cluster management and data protection tasks (e.g., snapshots, replication), not tiering policies.

Nutanix Files Console: The Nutanix Files Console is used for configuring and managing file servers and shares, but tiering policies are managed externally through Data Lens.

The NUSA course documentation emphasizes that “Nutanix Data Lens integrates with Nutanix Files to provide tiering capabilities, allowing administrators to manage data placement across on-premises and cloud storage tiers seamlessly.”

When deploying Nutanix Objects, internal communication and data flow between Object services are isolated usinginternal overlay IP rangesto avoid collisions with existing customer networks.

The NCP-US and NUSA course materials state:

“Nutanix Objects requires two separate internal IP address ranges: 10.100.0.0/16 and 10.200.0.0/16. These ranges are used exclusively for internal communication within the Nutanix Objects deployment, such as for object metadata, S3 gateway, and load balancing services.”

These10.x.x.x rangesmust not overlap with existing client or management networks.

They provide fully isolated internal object service communication.

Self-Service Restore (SSR) requires Nutanix Guest Tools (NGT) installed on client VMs. SSR allows end users to directly restore files/folders from snapshots via Windows Previous Versions or macOS Time Machine, enabling rapid ransomware recovery without IT intervention.

Option A/C: Async DR and Availability Zones are for disaster recovery (site-level), not granular file recovery.

Option D: File Analytics provides insights but cannot enable restores.

When setting up a Windows client to access aVolume Group (VG)via iSCSI, the administrator must configure the client’s iSCSI initiator to connect to the correcttarget.

1️⃣Data Services IP (DSIP):

TheDSIPis used by external clients (like Windows servers) to connect to Nutanix services, including iSCSI for Volume Groups. It’s a highly available IP that floats across the cluster CVMs.

2️⃣Volume Group Name (VG Name):

This is thetarget namethat the Windows iSCSI initiator will log on to. It’s needed to identify which Volume Group to access.

The cluster’s FQDN or all CVM IPs aren’t used for direct iSCSI target connections. TheDSIPensures proper load balancing and failover for the connection, while theVG nameis essential to identify the specific storage being requested.

The administrator is attempting to upgrade Objects Manager, a component of Nutanix Objects, but notices that the upgrade option is disabled in Prism Central’s Lifecycle Manager (LCM). The most likely reason is that an **Objects Service upgrade previously failed**. Nutanix Objects consists of multiple components, including Objects Manager and Objects Service, and LCM enforces dependencies between these components during upgrades. If a prior upgrade of Objects Service failed, LCM will disable the upgrade option for Objects Manager until the issue with Objects Service is resolved.

The **Nutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA)** course states, “LCM may disable the upgrade option for Objects Manager if a dependency, such as Objects Service, has a failed upgrade, as Nutanix Objects components must be upgraded in a specific order to maintain system stability.” Objects Service is a core component of Nutanix Objects that handles the underlying object storage operations, while Objects Manager provides management and orchestration. A failed Objects Service upgrade can leave the system in an inconsistent state, preventing further upgrades of related components like Objects Manager until the failure is resolved.

The **Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US)** study guide further elaborates that “a common reason for a disabled upgrade option in LCM for Objects Manager is a previous failure in upgrading Objects Service, which must be addressed by troubleshooting the failed upgrade and ensuring all dependencies are met.” The administrator should check the LCM logs for details of the failed Objects Service upgrade, resolve the issue (e.g., by addressing network connectivity, disk space, or version compatibility problems), and then retry the upgrade process.

The other options are incorrect:

- **Provided access keys are wrong**: Access keys are relevant for S3-compatible API access to Nutanix Objects buckets, not for LCM upgrades of Objects Manager.

- **Objects browser is not available**: The “Objects browser” is not a component or requirement for upgrading Objects Manager; this term may refer to the UI for browsing objects, which is unrelated to LCM upgrades.

- **Prism Element upgrade previously failed**: A failed Prism Element upgrade might affect cluster-level operations, but it is less likely to directly disable the Objects Manager upgrade option, as Objects Manager upgrades are managed through Prism Central and depend on Objects Service, not Prism Element.

The NUSA course documentation emphasizes that “a failed Objects Service upgrade is a frequent cause of disabled upgrade options for Objects Manager in LCM, requiring administrators to resolve the failure before proceeding.”