Free Practice Questions for Juniper JN0-363 Exam

When you want to advertise an interface in OSPF but not form an OSPF adjacency over that interface (for example, towards an ISP), you can configure the interface as passive. This will advertise the network on the interface in OSPF without sending OSPF hello packets or forming OSPF neighbor relationships on that interface.

References

Juniper Networks Technical Documentation on OSPF

OSPF Configuration Guide - Juniper Networks

According to the exhibit, the primary LSP is configured with a strict path via R2 to R4. Since the configuration shows valid next-hops and there is no indication of any issues, the primary LSP will be signaled and its state will be up. The secondary LSP with any-path is also configured and will be signaled as a backup; therefore, its state will be up as well, ready to take over if the primary fails.

In IS-IS, Level 1 routes are usually contained within the same area and Level 2 routes are used to interconnect different areas. By default, routes from Level 1 are redistributed into Level 2, and vice versa, to ensure reachability between areas.

References

Juniper Networks Technical Documentation on IS-IS

By default, IS-IS protocol leaks routing information from a Level 1 area to a Level 2 area. However, to leak routing information from a Level 2 area to a Level 1 area, an export policy must be explicitly configured.

In OSPF, a totally stubby area does not permit type 3 summary LSAs (inter-area routes) or type 5 external LSAs (routes from outside the OSPF domain) to be flooded into the area. The area border router (ABR) will only send a default route as a type 3 LSA into the totally stubby area.

In Junos OS, traffic engineering extensions for OSPF, which are required for an LSP to use the OSPF link state database for path computations, are not enabled by default. They must be explicitly enabled in the OSPF configuration. Therefore, answer C is correct. Answer B is incorrect and contradicts C. The 'no-cspf' command would disable CSPF (Constrained Shortest Path First), which is used for path computations in MPLS traffic engineering, so it should not be used if you want the LSP to utilize OSPF's link state database for path computations. Therefore, answer A is incorrect. The 'policing' parameter is not relevant to enabling traffic engineering extensions in OSPF, so answer D is incorrect.