Free Practice Questions for Google Professional-Cloud-DevOps-Engineer Exam

https://cloud.google.com/security-key-management

https://cloud.google.com/error-reporting/docs/formatting-error-messages

https://cloud.google.com/error-reporting/docs/reference/libraries#client-libraries-install-python

no need to install error reporting library on App Engine Flex.

https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/instances/preemptible

The best option for minimizing the number of log sinks created and ensuring that the log sinks apply to future projects is to create an aggregated log sink in the Dev and Prod folders. An aggregated log sink is a log sink that collects logs from multiple sources, such as projects, folders, or organizations. By creating an aggregated log sink in each folder, you can export log entries for development projects to dev_dataset and log entries for production projects to prod_dataset. You can also use filters to specify which logs you want to export. Additionally, by creating an aggregated log sink at the folder level, you can ensure that the log sink applies to future projects that are created under that folder.

The best option for implementing the rollback actions is to update the Kubernetes Service to point to the previous Kubernetes Deployment. A Kubernetes Service is a resource that defines how to access a set of Pods. A Kubernetes Deployment is a resource that manages the creation and update of Pods. By using the blue/green deployment methodology, you can create two Deployments, one for the current version (blue) and one for the new version (green), and use a Service to switch traffic between them. If you need to rollback, you can update the Service to point to the previous Deployment (blue) and stop sending traffic to the new Deployment (green).

https://www.terraform.io/docs/cloud/guides/recommended-practices/part3.3.html

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From SRE Principles:

This scenario presents a classic SRE conflict: maintaining reliability (as dictated by the exhausted error budget and deployment freeze) versus delivering an urgent business requirement. The error budget policy is there for a reason – to protect users from further instability.

A. Start the deployment of the feature immediately: This directly violates the established error budget policy and the deployment freeze. While the feature is urgent, deploying without caution when the system is already unstable (as indicated by the exhausted error budget) is highly risky and could exacerbate existing problems or introduce new ones, further impacting revenue and customer trust.

B. Delay the deployment of the feature until the error budget is replenished: This strictly adheres to the policy but might not be acceptable given the "urgently required by your largest customer" clause. SRE principles allow for reasoned exceptions and risk management, not just blind adherence if the business context is compelling enough and risks are managed.

C. Re-run the unit tests, and start the deployment of the feature if the tests pass: Unit tests are foundational but insufficient to guarantee a complex application will perform reliably in production, especially when the system is already indicating instability (exhausted error budget). Passing unit tests doesn't negate the risk signaled by the depleted error budget.

D. Deploy the feature to a subset of users, and gradually roll out to all users if there are no errors reported: This is the most balanced SRE approach in this situation. It acknowledges the urgency while attempting to mitigate risk:Risk Mitigation: A canary release (deploying to a small subset of users) limits the potential negative impact if the new feature introduces new errors or worsens existing instability.

Observation: It allows for careful monitoring of the new release in the production environment with real users.

Data-Driven Decision: The decision to proceed with a wider rollout is based on observed behavior ("if there are no errors reported"), not just assumptions.

Controlled Rollout: A gradual rollout allows for quick rollback if issues arise.

While an exhausted error budget signals a deployment freeze, critical business needs can sometimes necessitate a carefully managed exception. A canary release is a standard SRE technique for deploying changes with reduced risk, making it the most appropriate course of action when faced with such conflicting priorities. The team would also need to communicate clearly about the risks and the rationale for this exception. It's implied that this urgent feature might also fix existing issues or is critical enough to warrant the carefully managed risk.

Reference (Based on SRE principles from Google's SRE books and general practices):

Error Budgets: "The SRE Book" (Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems) discusses error budgets and deployment freezes. An exhausted error budget typically means no more risky changes until reliability improves.

Canary Releases: This is a fundamental practice for safely deploying new versions. It's about testing in production with a small percentage of traffic.

Managing Risk: SRE is about managing risk, not eliminating it entirely. In situations like this, a calculated risk with strong mitigation (canary, monitoring, rollback plan) can be justified for critical business needs. The decision involves weighing the risk of deploying against the risk of not deploying the urgent feature.

Option D represents a pragmatic SRE approach to navigate this difficult situation by minimizing the blast radius of the change.