Free Practice Questions for Fortinet NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6 Exam

According to the FortiOS 7.6 Administration Guide and Security Fabric documentation, automation stitches are designed to automate responses to security and system events across the network. A core characteristic of these stitches is their flexibility in action execution; specifically, multiple actions can run in parallel (Statement C). While the system allows for sequential execution with configurable delays between actions, the default behavior or configuration option allows for simultaneous responses, such as sending an email notification while simultaneously triggering a webhook or quarantining a host.

Furthermore, triggers can involve external connectors (Statement D). While many triggers are local to the FortiGate (such as reboots or log events), the Security Fabric allows the FortiGate to monitor and react to events from external components like FortiAnalyzer, FortiSIEM, or FortiClient EMS. For example, a FortiAnalyzer event handler can act as the trigger for a stitch on the root FortiGate. Statement A is incorrect because actions can target external systems like AWS Lambda or Slack which are not internal Fabric devices. Statement B is incorrect because each automation stitch is typically defined by a single trigger, though that trigger itself can be broad (e.g., "Any Security Rating Notification").

From the exhibits:

System performance output

Memory used: 90%

Free memory: ~5%

Default memory thresholds (FortiOS 7.6)

memory-use-threshold-green 82%

memory-use-threshold-red 88%

memory-use-threshold-extreme 89%

Because memory usage (90%) exceeds the extreme threshold (89%), the FortiGate enters conserve mode.

Effects of conserve mode (FortiOS 7.6 – verified)

B. FortiGate has entered conserve mode.

Correct

When memory usage exceeds the red/extreme threshold, FortiGate automatically enters conserve mode.

This is exactly the condition shown in the system performance output.

D. Administrators can change the configuration.

Correct

Even in conserve mode:

Administrators can still log in (GUI, SSH, console)

Configuration changes are allowed

FortiGate does not lock configuration access during conserve mode.

This behavior is explicitly documented in the FortiOS 7.6 Conserve Mode section.

Why the other options are incorrect

A. Administrators can access FortiGate only through the console port.

Incorrect

Network access (GUI/SSH) is still available in conserve mode unless otherwise restricted.

Console-only access is not a conserve-mode requirement.

C. FortiGate drops new sessions.

Incorrect (as a general statement)

FortiGate may drop or bypass new inspection-required sessions depending on fail-open/fail-close settings.

It does not universally drop all new sessions, so this statement is not always true.

Based on the FortiOS 7.6 Administrator Guide regarding Fortinet Single Sign-On (FSSO) polling modes, the agentless polling mode has specific technical characteristics:

SMB Protocol Usage (Statement B is True):

In agentless polling mode, the FortiGate unit itself acts as the collector.

It establishes direct connections to the Windows Domain Controllers (DCs) using the SMB (Server Message Block) protocol, typically over TCP port 445, to read the Windows Security Event logs.

This allows FortiGate to parse login event IDs (such as 4768 and 4769) to identify users and their corresponding IP addresses without needing an external collector agent installed on a server.

Workstation Check Support (Statement C is True):

One of the primary limitations of the agentless polling mode compared to the agent-based mode is the lack of workstation verification.

In agentless mode, FortiGate does not perform "workstation checks" or "dead entry checks". This means it cannot proactively verify if a user is still logged into a specific workstation after the initial logon event is recorded, which can lead to stale entries if a user logs off without a corresponding event being captured.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A: In agentless mode, FortiGate (the FSSO daemon) performs the collection itself; it does not use the AD server as a "collector agent" in the functional sense of FSSO architecture.

Option D: While FortiGate uses LDAP to retrieve group membership information once a user is identified, it does not "direct" a collector agent to a remote LDAP server, as there is no external collector agent involved in this specific mode.

In FortiOS 7.6, firewall policies can be displayed in multiple views to help administrators understand and manage rules more effectively. The difference in ordering between Interface Pair View and By Sequence View is intentional and documented.

Why the policy order is different

Interface Pair View

Groups firewall policies based on the incoming (From) and outgoing (To) interfaces.

Policies are organized under interface pairs such as:

LAN → WAN

WAN → LAN

Within each interface pair, policies may appear reordered compared to the global list.

This view is designed for readability and troubleshooting, not to show execution order.

By Sequence View

Displays firewall policies in their actual evaluation (processing) order.

This is the top-down order FortiGate uses when matching traffic.

It reflects the real rule sequence that determines which policy is hit first.

Why option C is correct

C. Interface Pair View sorts policies based on matching interfaces, while By Sequence View shows the actual processing order of rules.

This statement exactly matches FortiOS behavior as documented in the FortiOS 7.6 Firewall Policy Views section of the Administrator Guide.

Why the other options are incorrect

A: Interface Pair View does not follow traffic logs, and By Sequence View is not based on “rule priority” grouping.

B: FortiGate does not dynamically reorder policies based on traffic patterns.

D: Security levels do not affect policy ordering in Interface Pair View.

From the exhibits:

The firewall policy has Application Control enabled and uses certificate-inspection for SSL inspection.

The application sensor has Application and Filter Overrides with the following order (priority):

Excessive-Bandwidth with action Block

Google (vendor filter) with action Monitor

In FortiOS, Application and Filter Overrides are evaluated by priority (top-down). The first matching override is applied. If traffic matches an earlier override with Block, it will be blocked even if a later override would Monitor/Allow it.

Why Google apps fail while www.fortinet.com works:

Many Google applications can be detected as (or can trigger) the Excessive-Bandwidth behavior/signature depending on the specific service and traffic pattern.

Because Excessive-Bandwidth (Block) is above Google (Monitor), Google-related traffic may match the first rule and be blocked before the Google override is evaluated.

Access to www.fortinet.com works because that traffic is not matching the Excessive-Bandwidth override.

Therefore, to resolve:

B. Move up Google in the Application and Filter Overrides section to set its priority higher

This ensures Google matches the Google override before any broader blocking override is applied.

E. Set the action for Google in the Application and Filter Overrides section to Allow

This explicitly permits Google applications once the higher-priority match occurs (stronger than Monitor for troubleshooting and ensuring access).

Why the other options are not the best fit here:

A (deep-content inspection) can help identify more HTTPS applications, but the exhibit already shows a specific Google override configured; the immediate issue is the override evaluation order and action.

C relates to Web Filter URL categories, but the problem is occurring under Application Control behavior/vendor overrides.

D (flow-based) is not required to fix an override priority/action conflict.

NetAPI: Polls temporary sessions created on the DC when a user logs on or logs off and calls the NetSessionEnum function on Windows. It’s faster than the WinSec and WMI methods; however, it can miss some logon events if a DC is under heavy system load. This is because sessions can be quickly created and purged form RAM, before the agent has a chance to poll and notify FG.

From the exhibits:

The Application Control sensor has these key settings:

Application and Filter Overrides

Priority 1: Excessive-Bandwidth (Type: Filter) with Action Block

Priority 2: Google (Type: Filter) with Action Monitor

Category actions shown include Social Media set to Block (this category includes Facebook).

The firewall policy is using:

Flow-based inspection

Application control enabled (profile: default)

Deep inspection enabled (helps identify applications inside HTTPS)

Logging enabled

FortiOS applies Application Control as follows (top-down within the Application Control profile):

Overrides are evaluated by priority (highest priority first).

The first matching override determines the action (block/monitor/allow) for that traffic.

Category-based actions apply to applications that fall into those categories unless an override matches first.

Why A is correct

A. YouTube access is blocked based on Excessive-Bandwidth Application and Filter override settings.

The profile explicitly blocks the Excessive-Bandwidth behavior filter at the highest override priority.

When YouTube traffic is detected as matching the Excessive-Bandwidth behavior, FortiGate will apply the Block action due to the override.

Because this is a priority override, it is enforced before lower-priority entries.

Why B is correct

B. Facebook access is blocked based on the category filter settings.

The Application Sensor shows Social Media configured with a Block action.

Facebook is categorized under Social Media, so it will be blocked when matched by Application Control.

Why C is not correct

C. Facebook access is allowed but you cannot play Facebook videos...

Since the Social Media category is set to Block, Facebook would be blocked at the category level (not merely video playback).

Why D is not correct

D. YouTube search is allowed based on the Google override...

The Google override action is Monitor, not Allow.

“Monitor” logs/detects but does not override a block condition to “allow” traffic.

Also, YouTube traffic is not guaranteed to be treated as “Google” in a way that would permit it, and any matching block condition (such as Excessive-Bandwidth) would still take precedence.