Free Practice Questions for CIPS L4M5 Exam

In most commercial negotiations with monopolistic organisations, one can expect that in general they will have far greater bargaining power - you will need them more than they need you. There BATNA is stronger in the short run, but over time their power can be challenged effectively.

Ways of dealing with monopoly suppliers include the following:

Making yourself an attractive buyer

Seeking out alternatives / substitutes in a private or public manner

Designing out the requirement that forces you to go to the monopoly suppliers, or seek to make the product, or threaten to make it yourself if feasible

Lobbying government or campaigning, as part of an industry or trade body, for a reduction in barriers to entry that support the monopoly

There are nine commonly used influence tactic:

1. Rational persuasion includes using facts, data, and logical arguments to try to convince others that your point of view is the best alternative. This is the most commonly applied influence tactic.

2. Legitimating

3. Personal appeals

4. Exchange

5. Ingratiation

6. Pressure refers to exerting undue influence on someone to do what you want or else something undesirable will occur.

7. Coalitions refer to a group of individuals working together toward a common goal to influence others.

8. Inspirational appeals

9. Consultation refers to the influence agent’s asking others for help in directly influencing or planning to influence another person or group.

In the scenario, there is a problem with demand forecasting and supply chain planning in Leitax. The new Supply chain director invites the stakeholders to a meeting to find the solution. She is using coalition tactics.

Single-sourced relationships often involve exclusivity for a specific product (1) and a high level of trust and collaboration (3) between buyer and supplier. This type of relationship is selected forstrategic procurement purposes, often involving long-term partnerships, which align with CIPS’s relationship spectrum guidelines.

Integrative approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to create more of something of value to share, also known as collaborative approach or win-win. Integrative, interest-based negotiation can facilitate constructive, positive relationship and establishes contracts between parties on a foundation of goodwill. In integrative bargaining, both parties seek to 'expand the pie' by creating more value for both the buyer and the seller. Integrative negotiation ‘shares the pie’ and is interest rather than positional based.

In distributive bargaining, the focus is on claiming value and getting as much of the pie as parties can.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Activity-based costing is an alternative approach to traditional absorption costing. The characteristics of these two methods are illustrated in the graph below:

Graphical user interface, text, chat or text message, website Description automatically generated

Below are some examples of cost input that can be analysed in PPCA process:

- Material costs

- Process and labour costs

- Employment costs

- Overhead costs

- Distribution costs

- Depreciation on equipment

- Profit

If you want to learn more on PPCA, you can study from OGC document here: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100609100650/www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Cost_Price_analysis(1).pdf

LO 2, AC 2.1

To improve negotiation outcomes, seeking feedback from the supplier (1) and undertaking reflective practice (4) are recommended actions. Feedback from the supplier can provide insights into areas for improvement from the counterparty's perspective, while reflective practice allows the negotiator to evaluate their own approach, outcomes, and areas for growth. This approach aligns with CIPS's emphasis on continuous improvement in negotiation skills.

An adversarial negotiation style is appropriate when one party has high bargaining power and is focused on maximizing its benefit rather than maintaining a long-term relationship. This approach often involves competitive tactics that leverage power disparities, aligning with CIPS guidance on when adversarial tactics may be strategically used in negotiations.

A shift in demand occurs when an influencing factor other than price changes. Those factors are:

- The income of buyers

- The tastes and preferences of buyers

- The prices of other goods and services, especially substitutes and complements

- Expectations of buyer about the future

In this question:

- 'Prices of complementary goods decrease' will lead to quantity demanded for that complements rising, then demand for consumer good will increase accordingly.

- 'Price of the consumer good decreases' will increase the quantity demanded for that good, but it will not shift the demand curve

- 'Customers' expectation of higher prices in the future': in this scenario, customers tend to buy more to store in present, which leads to demand curve shifting to the right

- 'Consumer tastes shift toward substitute products': Demand for substitutes will rise, so demand for that consumer good will decrease and the demand curve shifts to the left.

LO 2, AC 2.2