Free Practice Questions for CIPS L4M5 Exam

An adversarial negotiation style is more suitable in a market with many alternative sources and substitutes (B). When there are multiple suppliers, buyers have the upper hand and can adopt a competitive stance without risking supply continuity. This aligns with CIPS guidance on the use of adversarial styles in competitive markets with numerous alternatives.

If interest rate are too low and credit is too, cheap rates can fund a spending boom with consumers and businesses buying (investment) more than they can afford to pay back.

The coercive power comes from the belief that a person can punish others for non-compliance. It can be considered as opposite to reward power, which results from one person's ability to compensate or reward another for compliance.

LO 1, AC 1.3

The analysis of cost into fixed and variable enables organisations to determine their break-even point (BE) - the point where total revenue from sales and total cost exactly balance. All costs need to be covered by sale revenue in order for a company to make a profit. If you know your fixed costs and your variable costs then you can work out the minimum quantity of goods or services you need to sell to break even. Break even point is measured in volume and can be worked out graphically or via formulae:

Price - Variable costs = Contribution

Break even point (volume) = Fixed expenses/Contribution margin per unit

In this scenario, the break even point (Q) is: 270,000/(180-126) = 5,000

To make a profit, the supplier needs to sell more than 5,000 units per month.

The BE point is thus an important determinant of flexibility of pricing for suppliers. Before BE is achieved there will be much greater reluctance to offer price concessions to customers than after BE is achieved.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Buying organisation may increase its leverage with suppliers by concentrating spend. Supplier spend consolidation can take many forms as outlined below:

Vendor base reduction: straightforward reduction of number of suppliers in any category

Volume pooling: pooling cross organisational requirement until your order volume is high enough to attract new bidders/additional discounts

Volume redistribution: making recommendations following spend analysis to move from one supplier to another

Volume consolidation across categories: certain purchase requirements may be common across a number of categories

Standardisation and harmonisation of specifications: analysis of specifications and standards for a high spend purchased input, may show that there is a little difference between them and that the specification can be standardised or at least harmonised across the group or across national, regional or global operations.

Forming purchasing consortia: buyers may decide to come together and combine their purchase volumes to attract better deals.

A useful model of personal power that has survived the test of time and provide a simple way to analyse negotiation in French and Raven's Power Base Model, which describes six bases of power:

Supplier conditioning is the process of influencing a supplier or suppliers to behave in a certain way, or to accept certain circumstances. Within a negotiation, the buyer needs to make sure that the supplier has a number of messages in mind, about the outcomes that the buyer needs to achieve and about the shared sense of purpose that buying organisation has in achieving these outcomes.

Supplier appraisal is a process of evaluating a supplier's ability to carry out a contract in term of quality, delivery, price and other contributing factors.

Supplier positioning is the process of classifying spend with a supplier in terms of the profit potential and supply risk and assists in prioritising categories of spend and developing the right strategy.

Supplier selection is the process of selecting a supplier to acquire the necessary materials to support the outputs of organisations. Selection of the best and/or the most suitable suppliers is based on assessing supplier capabilities (Shih et al., 2004).

A negotiation performance review should focus on measuring outcomes against objectives, lessons learned, and evaluation of negotiator effectiveness. This ensures continual improvement and supports organisational learning. Pricing structures and alternative suppliers may have been reviewed earlier, but are not part of post-performance reflection. Travel expenses are irrelevant to negotiation learning. By focusing on objectives, learning, and performance, organisations embed best practice and prepare stronger strategies for future negotiations.

Microeconomic factors concern the conditions specific to suppliers, buyers, and markets — such as supplier communications, annual reports, and industry-specific data. These provide insight into cost structures, capacity, and competitive positioning. Macroeconomic factors, by contrast, include inflation indices (RPI), financial market trends, or global commodity prices. Distinguishing between micro and macro sources allows negotiators to build more precise intelligence for supplier discussions.