Free Practice Questions for Adobe AD0-E906 Exam

When configuring allowed HTTP request methods for /bin/workfront-tools on the AEM dispatcher, the safest and most appropriate methods to allow areGET, POST, and PUT. These methods cover the basic operations for retrieving data (GET), submitting data (POST), and updating data (PUT), which are typically required for the Enhanced Connector functionality.

GET: Used to retrieve data from the server.

POST: Used to send data to the server.

PUT: Used to update resources on the server.

Options A (DELETE) and B (HEAD, DELETE) are riskier and less commonly needed for this use case, and DELETE should be restricted unless absolutely necessary to prevent unintended deletions.

Refer toAdobe documentation on Dispatcher securityfor best practices regarding allowed HTTP methods.

To enable the search of products by SKU number in AEM, two main configurations are required:

Multi Value Property Predicate: By using a Multi Value Property Predicate, users can search for multiple SKU numbers at once. This is crucial if product owners need to query for multiple products simultaneously.

Single Line Text Field for SKU: SKU numbers are typically unique, so adding aSingle Line Text fieldto the image metadata schema for SKU numbers ensures that each image has its own SKU field for accurate identification during searches.

Option D is incorrect because SKUs are usually single, unique identifiers, so a Multi Value Text field isn’t necessary for each SKU.

Refer to AEM’sdocumentation on customizing metadata schemasandAssets Admin Searchto implement these features.

In this scenario, the company is looking to group projects based on a benefit calculation from a custom form. The most efficient way to achieve this grouping and reporting structure in Adobe Workfront is by creating avalue expressionon the view. This method allows you to dynamically link the benefit value from the request object to other reporting structures, including the project object.

Value Expression on View:The value expression acts as a direct link between the custom form's calculated field and the reporting or view settings, enabling the system to pull the benefit value dynamically from the request.

Request Object Linking:By linking to the source request object through the value expression, it allows for seamless integration of calculated values into the project reporting view, ensuring that the benefit groups (Level 1-4) can be reported accurately based on the defined thresholds (0, 1-5, 6-10, 11-15).

This approach is more efficient compared to creating multiple calculated fields across different objects, and it allows for better maintainability and adaptability in future changes.

References from Adobe Workfront documentation emphasize the use ofvalue expressionsin reports and views for linking and utilizing calculated fields across different objects, enhancing the flexibility and power of custom reporting capabilities. Text mode is not necessary here because it is primarily used for custom formatting or more advanced use cases that don't involve simple value transfers between objects.

For more detailed information, you can refer to the official Workfront Help documentation onCustom FormsandAdvanced Reporting Techniquesin Adobe Workfront, where calculated fields and value expressions are thoroughly covered.

In AEM, when you need to manage access control (ACL) permissions, including setting specific permissions (like WRITE) for a service user on child nodes without affecting the parent node, thePermission Consoleis the appropriate tool.

ThePermission Consoleallows you to set fine-grained permissions at both node and subnode levels, which is crucial for scenarios where access needs to be applied only to children nodes, not the parent node itself.

Option A (User Management Console) is used for managing user details, and Option C (Group Management Console) manages group settings, but neither of these are used for setting node-level permissions.

Refer to AEM’sUser and Group Access Managementdocumentation for more information on using the Permission Console to manage ACLs effectively.

In the given scenario, the developer needs to execute a Maven profile specifically for theCloud Manager deployment pipeline. This requires the use of a property that is exclusive to Cloud Manager, allowing the profile to activate only when the build is being executed in the Cloud Manager environment.

Option C uses the correct activation property:

env.cloudmanager

This property is specific to Adobe's Cloud Manager environment, ensuring that this Maven profile will only be activated during Cloud Manager deployments. This allows the local deployment process to remain unaffected while the correct profile is triggered in Cloud Manager.

Options A and B use other properties (env.CM_BUILD or CM_BUILD) that are not standard or specific to the Cloud Manager environment, making them incorrect choices.

For more details, you can refer to Adobe’sCloud Manager Maven Configurationdocumentation, which outlines how to configure Maven profiles specifically for Cloud Manager's deployment pipelines.

In this case, the solutions consultant needs to limit thelegal team’s accessto read-only for all content in AEM. Since the legal team will be working in Workfront and accessing AEM via the enhanced connector, the best way to manage their access is to applyAccess Control Entries (ACEs)to the wf-workfront-users user group.

ACEsallow you to specify detailed permissions for a group or user in AEM, such as granting read-only access to specific resources or folders within the DAM.

Options A and C would either grant too much access (as in the case of the Everyone user group) or allow contributions, which is beyond the requirement of just reading access.

Refer toAEM Access Control Management documentationto learn more about setting up ACEs and managing permissions.

In AEM, for a custom workflow process to be available for selection in the dropdown menu of a process step, theprocess.nameproperty must be set in the @Component annotation. This property defines the unique name under which the custom workflow process will be registered and visible in the workflow model editor.

Here is an example of how this should be added to the existing code:

@Component(service = WorkflowProcess.class,

property = {"process.label=Custom Workflow Process", "process.name=customWorkflowProcess"})

process.label: This is the label that appears in the workflow model editor dropdown.

process.name: This is the internal identifier used by AEM to register the workflow process.

Options A and B would define other properties but will not resolve the issue of the custom workflow not appearing in the dropdown. The key property needed here is process.name.

For more details, refer to theAEM documentation on creating custom workflows and annotating components.

The requirement is to deploy the com.myCompany.ui.content package specifically to theAEM Cloud Service authorenvironment. The key here is ensuring that the package is targeted correctly to the author instance, without affecting other environments.

Option A uses the following target:

/apps/my-company-packages/content/install.author

The use of install.author ensures that the package will only be installed on theauthor environmentof AEM as a Cloud Service, meeting the developer's requirement. This is a common approach in AEM Cloud Service projects, where you differentiate between environments using the appropriate subfolder (in this case, author).

Option B (author.install) and Option D are similar but incorrect because they are not standard for specifying the exact environment, while Option C (install/) is too generic and could apply to both author and publish environments.

Refer to theAEM Cloud Service documentationon deployment and package management for more details on targeting specific environments such asauthorduring content deployment.

When a new metadata profile is applied to a folder in AEM, itonly affects new assetsadded to that folderafterthe profile is applied. Existing assets that were already in the folder or subfolders prior to the profile being assigned will retain the metadata profile that was previously applied.

To update the metadata of existing assets with the new profile, you would need to either manually update the assets or run a script to reapply the metadata profile to those assets.

Option B is incorrect because the profile applies to all assets in the folder, not just direct children. Option C is incorrect because if there were invalid field values, you would likely see an error or warning, rather than a silent failure.

For more details, refer to AEM’sdocumentation on managing and applying metadata profiles.