Free Practice Questions for APICS CPIM-8.0 Exam

FIFO inventory accounting assumes that the first items purchased or produced are the first ones sold or used. Therefore, the cost of goods sold reflects the oldest costs of inventory. If a company uses a more expensive shipment of components instead of the lower-cost ones that were previously received, it will increase the cost of goods sold and reduce the gross profit margin. This is because the newer components have a higher unit cost than the older ones, and the cost of goods sold is calculated by multiplying the unit cost by the number of units sold or used. References:

•CPIM Part 1 Exam Content Manual, page 17, section 3.2.1: “Explain the impact of inventory valuation methods (for example, first in, first out [FIFO], last in, first out [LIFO], average cost, standard cost) on financial statements and taxes.”

•CPIM Part 1 Study Guide, page 63, section 3.2.1: “The FIFO method assumes that the first goods purchased or produced are the first goods sold. The cost of goods sold is based on the oldest costs, and the ending inventory is based on the most recent costs. The FIFO method results in a higher net income and a higher ending inventory value in a period of rising prices.”

A low-cost provider strategy is a business strategy where a company aims to become the most cost-efficient player in its industry, often by producing goods or providing services at a lower cost than its competitors. The overall goal is to increase market share or achieve higher profitability. The low-cost leader in an industry often sets the price that other companies have to match or beat to stay competitive12.

A low-cost provider strategy works best when buyers are more price sensitive, meaning they are more likely to switch to cheaper alternatives if the price of a product or service increases. This condition creates a strong demand for low-priced products or services, and gives the low-cost leader a competitive advantage over rivals who have higher costs and prices. Buyers are more price sensitive when34:

•The product or service is standardized or undifferentiated, and there are few switching costs.

•The product or service represents a significant portion of the buyer’s budget or income.

•The product or service has low quality, performance, or image attributes that limit the buyer’s satisfaction or loyalty.

•The product or service is not crucial to the buyer’s well-being or enjoyment.

The other options are not correct because:

•A. Price competition among rivals is similar. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is already highly competitive and there is little room for differentiation. A low-cost leader would have to lower its prices even further to gain an edge over rivals, which could erode its profitability and sustainability.

•C. There are many ways to achieve product differentiation. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is diverse and dynamic, and there are many opportunities for innovation and value creation. A low-cost leader would have to invest more in research and development, marketing, and customer service to keep up with the changing customer preferences and expectations, which could increase its costs and reduce its efficiency.

•D. There are few industry newcomers. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is mature and stable, and there are few threats from new entrants. A low-cost leader would have to rely on its existing customer base and market share, which could limit its growth potential and expose it to the risk of obsolescence.

References := 1 Low-cost leadership strategy: Explained with examples2 2 Low-Cost Producer: Definition, Strategies, Examples - Investopedia4 3 Low Cost Strategy - Definition, Factors & Example - MBA Skool5 4 Generating Advantage – Strategic Management - Open Educational Resources1

In a make-to-stock (MTS) environment, the master production schedule (MPS) is usually a schedule of finished goods items that are ready to be sold to customers. Phantom items, component/subassembly items, and raw material items are not typically scheduled in the MPS, but rather in the material requirements planning (MRP) system, which is driven by the MPS. References:

CPIM 8.0 Exam Content Manual Preview, page 10, section 4.1.1

CPIM Part 1 Study Guide, page 66, section 4.1.1

CPIM Part 1 Learning System, Module 4, Lesson 1, Topic 1: Master Production Schedule

A bill of distribution is the planned channels of inventory disbursement from one or more sources to field warehouses and ultimately to the customer. There may be one or more levels in the disbursement system. It is used to allocate inventory among different distribution centers based on demand, capacity, and costs. A bill of distribution is similar to a bill of materials, but for distribution planning instead of production planning. The other options are not correct, as they refer to different concepts in distribution management:

•A supply chain community is a network of organizations that collaborate to achieve common goals and objectives in the supply chain.

•Interplant demand is the demand for a product or component from one plant to another within the same company.

•Logistics data interchange (LDI) is the electronic exchange of information between logistics partners, such as suppliers, carriers, and customers. References:

•[CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 4 - Distribution Planning]

•Distribution Channel Design

•APICS Flashcards

A company that uses two-level master scheduling has a master production schedule (MPS) for the end items (kits) and a final assembly schedule (FAS) for the components (tools). The forecasts that are input to master scheduling should reflect the total number of kits and the specific kit configurations, as these determine the demand for the components. The other options are not relevant for master scheduling, as they do not reflect the end item demand or the bill of materials structure. References: EXAM CONTENT MANUAL PREVIEW, page 10, section 4.1.2. Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management: The CPIM Reference, Second Edition, page 163, section 6.2.

 Improvements in an input/output control (I/O control) system will most likely lead to a reduction in queue size and queue time. An I/O control system is a method of managing the flow of work orders in a production system by matching the input rate to the output rate. The input rate is the number of work orders that are released to the shop floor in a given period. The output rate is the number of work orders that are completed and shipped to the customers in a given period. An I/O control system aims to keep the input rate equal to the output rate, or slightly lower, to avoid overloading the system and creating excess inventory. By improving the I/O control system, the production system can achieve a smoother and more balanced flow of work orders, which reduces the queue size and queue time at each work center. Queue size is the number of work orders that are waiting to be processed at a work center. Queue time is the amount of time that a work order spends in the queue before being processed. A reduction in queue size and queue time can improve the production efficiency, quality, and flexibility, as well as the customer service and satisfaction. The other options are not correct, as they are not the most likely outcomes of improvements in an I/O control system, but rather possible effects of other factors or methods:

Flattened bills of material (BOMs) are the result of simplifying the product structure and reducing the number of components or levels in a BOM. Flattened BOMs can reduce the complexity and lead time of the production process, but they are not directly related to the I/O control system.

A change in operation sequencing is the result of altering the order or priority of the work orders or operations in a production system. A change in operation sequencing can affect the production flow and capacity, but it is not necessarily caused by the I/O control system.

Fewer engineering change notifications are the result of minimizing the changes in the product design or specification during the production process. Fewer engineering change notifications can reduce the disruption and cost of the production process, but they are not directly related to the I/O control system. References:

[CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 2 - Capacity Planning]

Input/Output Control | SpringerLink

Input/Output Control - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Input/Output Control - InventoryOps.com

 Mean time between failures (MTBF) is the average time that elapses from one unplanned breakdown to the next, under normal operating conditions. It is a useful measure of reliability because it indicates how long a repairable system typically operates before failing. Reliability is the absence of unplanned downtime, and MTBF measures how often a system stops performing as expected. The other statements are not true about MTBF. MTBF is not used for non-repairable products, as they cannot be fixed and put back into operation after a failure. For non-repairable products, mean time to failure (MTTF) is used as a measure of reliability. MTBF is not proportional to quality, as quality is a broader concept that encompasses not only reliability, but also performance, durability, and customer satisfaction. MTBF is not the same as operating life or service life, as they referto the total time that a system can function before reaching the end of its useful life, while MTBF refers to the average time between failures within the operating life. References: Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF): How to Calculate & Increase, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

The demonstrated capacity last week is the total number of models completed by both modelers in 40 hours. One modeler finished 5 models a day, which means 25 models in a week. The other modeler finished 1 model a day, which means 5 models in a week. Therefore, the demonstrated capacity last week is 25 + 5 = 30 models. However, this is not one of the options given. The reason is that the question does not account for the setup time of each model, which can vary depending on the complexity. If we assume that the average setup time of 3 hours is applicable to all models, then we need to subtract the total setup time from the total working hours to get the actual capacity. The total setup time for30 models is 30 x 3 = 90 hours. The total working hours for both modelers is 2 x 40 = 80 hours. Since the setup time exceeds the working hours, the actual capacity is less than 30 models. To find the actual capacity, we need to solve the following equation:

80 = x * 3 + x * 1

where x is the number of models completed. Simplifying the equation, we get:

x = 10

Therefore, the actual capacity is 10 models, which is option C. References:

Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 6: Capacity Management, Section 6.1: Capacity Concepts, Subsection 6.1.1: Capacity Definitions

CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 4: Supply, Section 4.2: Capacity Management, Subsection 4.2.1: Capacity Concepts

One way to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain is to require traceability for components. Liability risk is the risk that a party may be held responsible for certain types of losses caused by its actions or products to third parties1. Traceability is the ability to track the origin, history, location, and movement of a product or a component through the supply chain2. Requiring traceability for components can help to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain by enabling the identification and verification of the quality, safety, and compliance of the components, as well as the detection and prevention of counterfeit, defective, or hazardous components. Traceability can also facilitate the recall, repair, or replacement of faulty components, and the allocation of responsibility and accountability among the supply chain partners in case of a liability claim34. References: 1 What is a Liability Risk? - Definition from Insuranceopedia 5 2 Traceability - Wikipedia 6 3 Supply Chain Liability in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence … 7 4 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 8