Free Practice Questions for iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam

The pseudocode provided for review indicates a password entry system with a lockout mechanism after a certain number of failed attempts. The issues identified during the code review are:

Variables have not been properly defined with meaningful names - the variables used in the pseudocode are not descriptive, which can make the code difficult to understand and maintain.

There are unused variables defined - the pseudocode includes variables that are declared but not used, which is inefficient and can lead to confusion.

Loop counters are not properly initialized - if a loop counter is used, it must be initialized correctly to ensure the loop functions as intended.

There are statements within the loop that should be outside the loop - certain messages or actions may be repeated unnecessarily within a loop when they should be placed outside to execute only once.

References = ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and study resources emphasize the importance of clear, maintainable code, which includes using meaningful variable names, removing unused variables, proper initialization of loop counters, and correct placement of code statements to avoid redundancy and inefficiency in code execution. These principles are essential for agile technical testing to ensure that the code remains robust and adaptable to changes.

The testable acceptance criteria for the user story are those that can be verified through testing to ensure they meet the user’s needs and the system’s functionality. In this case:

Criterion (i) is testable because you can verify the payment methods.

Criterion (ii) is testable as you can check if the acknowledgement email is sent after form submission.

Criterion (iv) is testable by confirming that the information is stored in the database correctly.

Criteria (iii) and (v), while important, are not explicitly testable from the user story’s perspective without further clarification on how spam protection is measured and what constitutes ‘incorrect’ user inputs.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester materials emphasize the importance of creating testable acceptance criteria that are clear, measurable, and verifiable within the context of the user story12. This ensures that the developed feature meets the user’s requirements and functions as intended2.

 The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus suggests that after a successful proof of concept (POC), it is important to expand the Continuous Integration (CI) process to handle various test configurations. This is especially relevant for a product deployed across different hardware configurations in Europe. By enabling different test configurations in the CI process, you can ensure that the product works correctly on all the hardware configurations it will encounter in the market. This step is crucial for maintaining the quality and reliability of the product in diverse environments.

References = ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and Training resources12.

 The correct use of Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) to design test scenarios involves specifying the behavior in a given-when-then format. This format helps to clarify the conditions under which a particular outcome should occur. Option A follows this structure correctly:

Given that the shopper scans their card (the precondition),

When they checkout (the action),

Then they should receive all the quantity discounts for everything they have purchased (the expected outcome).

This scenario clearly outlines the behavior of the system in response to the user’s actions, which is central to BDD.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus emphasizes the importance of creating testable acceptance criteria for a given user story using requirements engineering and test techniques, which include the application of BDD in the context of a given user story12.

When a conflict arises regarding user story requirements, it is essential to engage in active collaboration to resolve the issue. The tester should work with the Business Analyst (BA) and the product owner to clarify and negotiate the requirements. This approach ensures that the user story reflects the needs of all stakeholders and that the acceptance criteria are agreed upon before testing proceeds. It aligns with Agile principles, which emphasize teamwork, customer collaboration, and the ability to respond to change.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents highlight the importance of collaboration and communication within Agile teams to resolve differences and refine requirements. It also underscores the role of the tester in facilitating discussions to ensure that the user stories are well-understood and testable12.

 The correct statement about performing exploratory testing with test charters is that the result of such testing is finding defects and specification defects. Exploratory testing with test charters is a structured but flexible approach that focuses on learning about the system and designing tests as one explores the system12. It allows testers to uncover not just defects in the code, but also gaps or ambiguities in the specifications or requirements. This approach is particularly useful when there are no detailed specifications available, as it relies on the tester’s skill and intuition to explore the system’s behavior12. Test charters guide the exploratory testing session but do not prescribe specific expected results upfront, as is done in black-box testing. Instead, they provide a mission or objective for the testing session, allowing for a more investigative approach to testing12.

References =

ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Syllabus1

ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Learning Objectives2

Please ensure to refer to the latest ISTQB documents and resources for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

The TDD process, as described, seems to lack comprehensive testing that covers all the acceptance criteria. Specifically, the tests provided by the developers do not address the full range of input validation, such as ensuring that names with up to 30 characters are accepted and that standard error processing is in place to limit user errors. This indicates that the tests are insufficient and need to include more options to fully validate the feature against its acceptance criteria. The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus emphasizes the importance of creating testable acceptance criteria within an Agile team and implementing various Agile test approaches using appropriate techniques12. It also highlights the need for supporting and contributing to test automation activities in an Agile project12, which includes ensuring that all acceptance criteria are met and that tests are sufficiently robust to catch potential errors.

References =

ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Syllabus1

ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Learning Objectives2

One of the fundamental characteristics of unit tests is that they should be independent of other system components. This means that a unit test should only cover the functionality of a single component or unit of code, without relying on or interacting with external systems or modules. This independence ensures that the tests are focused, reliable, and can be run quickly, providing immediate feedback on the code quality of the unit being tested.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents outline the importance of unit test independence as a key aspect of technical testing in an Agile context. This characteristic is crucial for maintaining the effectiveness and efficiency of the testing process within Agile development cycles1.

When creating a user story, it is essential to consider the perspective of the end user. This is because user stories are meant to capture the requirements and experiences of the actual users who will interact with the system or product. The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus emphasizes the importance of analyzing user stories and epics using requirements engineering techniques, which include creating and evaluating testable acceptance criteria from the end user’s perspective. This approach ensures that the developed features will meet the real needs and expectations of the users, leading to a more user-centered and valuable product.

References = ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and Training resources12.