Free Practice Questions for WGU Data-Driven-Decision-Making Exam

When the null hypothesis is accepted in anF-test, it indicates that there is no statistically significant difference between group variances or means, depending on the test design. Acceptance occurs when thetest statistic is less than the critical value, meaning the observed variation is within expected limits.

Accepting the null hypothesis implies thatno meaningful differenceexists between the samples. If the test statistic exceeded the critical value, the null hypothesis would be rejected.

Thus, the correct results areA and D.

Quality management emphasizescontinuous improvement at the individual levelas a foundation for organizational excellence. In data-driven decision making, this involves a commitment by every individual to enhance both theirskillsandeffectivenessover time.

Increasing one’s skills ensures that employees remain competent, adaptable, and capable of using analytical tools and data effectively. Improving effectiveness focuses on applying those skills efficiently to produce better outcomes, reduce errors, and add value to organizational processes.

Independent work processes and expert-level objectives are not universal expectations for all employees and may not align with collaborative quality frameworks. Continuous improvement is incremental and inclusive, encouraging consistent growth rather than elite specialization.

Therefore, the correct answers areA and B.

Thechi-square statisticis used to compare frequencies of categorical, mutually exclusive outcomes. In data-driven decision making, it is appropriate for analyzing differences between observed counts.

New and used car sales represent mutually exclusive categories, making chi-square the correct choice. Therefore, the correct answer isB.

Key performance indicators (KPIs) are designed to measure progress toward strategic objectives. In data-driven decision making, effective KPIs arestable, meaningful, and aligned with organizational goalsrather than frequently changing.

One important quality of KPIs is that theycan be used for internal benchmarking, allowing organizations to compare performance across departments, time periods, or projects. This helps identify best practices and performance gaps.

Another defining characteristic is that KPIs often followSMART criteria—Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. These criteria ensure KPIs are clearly defined and actionable.

KPIs are not meant to be easily changed, as frequent changes undermine consistency and comparability. They also require ongoing monitoring and maintenance to remain relevant and accurate.

Therefore, the correct answers areB and D.

To make a valid comparison in data-driven decision making, samples must becomparable and drawn from the same population, differing only in the factor being evaluated. In this case, the goal is to compare patient satisfaction between online telemedicine visits and in-person visits atFamily Practice A.

Usingonline Family Practice A telemedicine visits and in-person Family Practice A visitsensures that both samples come from the same organization, patient base, and survey methodology. This controls for external factors such as practice standards, demographics, and survey design, allowing differences in ratings to be attributed to the visit type rather than unrelated variables.

Comparing total visits to only one visit type introduces imbalance. Including other family practices introduces external variation and invalidates the comparison. Data-driven decision making stresses consistency and relevance in sample selection to ensure accurate conclusions.

Therefore, the correct answer isD, as it uses comparable samples that isolate the variable of interest.

Prescriptive analyticsis the analytics classification that uses experimental design and optimization techniques to suggest a specific course of action. In data-driven decision making, prescriptive analytics represents the most advanced stage of analytics, as it not only predicts outcomes but also recommends decisions that lead to optimal results.

Descriptive analytics summarizes historical data to explain what has already happened, while predictive analytics uses statistical and probabilistic models to estimate what is likely to happen in the future. Diagnostic analytics focuses on understanding why something happened by identifying root causes. In contrast, prescriptive analytics answers the critical question:what should be done.

Prescriptive analytics relies on methods such as optimization models, simulation, decision trees, and experimental design. These techniques evaluate multiple scenarios, constraints, and objectives to identify the best possible action. For example, organizations use prescriptive analytics to optimize pricing, allocate resources efficiently, schedule operations, or determine optimal investment strategies.

Within data-driven decision-making frameworks, prescriptive analytics bridges analysis and action by directly supporting managerial decision-making. It transforms analytical insights into concrete recommendations that can be implemented to improve performance and outcomes. Therefore, the correct answer isC, as prescriptive analytics explicitly uses experimental design and optimization to suggest a course of action.

Big datamust be analyzed using powerful analytic tools due to its volume, velocity, and variety. In data-driven decision making, traditional tools are often insufficient for processing massive, complex datasets generated from digital platforms, sensors, and transactions.

Big data requires advanced computing power, specialized software, and sophisticated algorithms to extract meaningful insights. Inferential statistics and small datasets can often be handled with conventional statistical tools.

Therefore, the correct answer isC, big data.

To determine the probability of achieving a specific monetary threshold, data-driven decision making relies onstandardization using the z-score. A z-score measures how many standard deviations a value is from the mean and allows analysts to calculate probabilities using the normal distribution.

In this scenario, the nonprofit wants to assess the likelihood that total donations will reach at least $50,000 given a known mean and standard deviation. The z-score enables conversion of the donation target into a standardized value, which can then be evaluated using probability tables or statistical software.

R-squared measures model fit in regression, the t-statistic is used in hypothesis testing, and the median does not support probability calculations. Therefore, the appropriate measure for determining probability in this context is thez-score, making optionDcorrect.

Ablind studyis specifically designed to eliminate bias that occurs when participants are aware of treatment assignments. In data-driven decision making and experimental research, patient awareness of receiving a placebo or treatment can influence reported symptoms, perceived effectiveness, and behavior, thereby biasing results.

In a blind study, participants do not know whether they are receiving the treatment or the placebo. This prevents expectations or beliefs from influencing outcomes and ensures that observed effects are attributable to the treatment itself rather than psychological or behavioral factors.

Observational studies and prospective cohort studies do not involve controlled assignment of treatments and therefore cannot eliminate this type of bias. Time series studies analyze data over time but do not address participant awareness of treatment allocation.

By preventing patients from knowing their treatment group, blind studies improve internal validity and support more accurate causal inference. Therefore, the correct answer isD, blind study.