Free Practice Questions for Salesforce Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam

Dynamic Forms: Salesforce Dynamic Forms enable administrators to create field sections that adapt based on device form factors (mobile, desktop, or tablet). This helps align data properly on different devices without requiring custom code.

Why Option C is Correct:

Dynamic Forms allow flexibility to display relevant fields and layouts for different devices without creating separate overrides or custom components.

It adheres to the company’s objective of improving productivity by offering a user-friendly interface across form factors.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option A: Custom LWC overrides add unnecessary complexity and require more maintenance.

Option B: Visualforce is outdated for modern Salesforce solutions and not recommended for such use cases.

For more details, refer to the Salesforce documentation on Dynamic Forms: https://help.salesforce.com/

View All Data Permission:

The "View All Data" permission allows a user to see all data in the organization, including user records, regardless of sharing rules or OWD settings.

Why Option C is Correct:

The corporate identity and access team requires broad access to audit user setup. "View All Data" provides this level of visibility across the org.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option A: "View" permission on the User object is insufficient to audit all user setups.

Option B: "View All Users" only allows visibility into user records, not their permissions or other related details.

For further information, see Salesforce permissions documentation: https://help.salesforce.com/

With a private organization-wide default (OWD) model for the Account object, users do not have automatic access to related records they do not own. However, Salesforce provides implicit sharing, which ensures that the owner of a child record, such as an Opportunity, is granted Read access to the related parent Account. This implicit sharing does not extend to Edit or Create permissions unless additional sharing rules, roles, or explicit access mechanisms are configured. Therefore, the sales rep will have Read access to the Account associated with their owned Opportunities. (developer.salesforce.com)

Dynamic Forms allow administrators to create page layouts with field visibility controlled at the section level based on record-specific criteria, such as the Case Record Type. This approach ensures servicing agents only see fields relevant to the specific case type, enhancing usability and performance.

Option A (Correct): Dynamic Forms provide flexibility and scalability for managing field visibility dynamically without duplicating layouts.

Option B: Using different Page Layouts is less efficient because managing and maintaining a separate layout for each case type is cumbersome with 400 fields and eight processes.

Option C: A custom LWC adds complexity and development overhead, making it a less optimal solution for this scenario.

Even though Mary is Joe's manager in the Role Hierarchy, the lack of Read permission for the Invoice object on Mary’s profile prevents her from viewing Joe’s invoice records. Salesforce enforces object-level permissions, which override sharing rules, OWD settings, and role hierarchy. Without the Read permission on the Invoice object, Mary cannot access the records, even with Public Read-Only OWD or Role Hierarchy privileges.

Sharing Sets in Partner Communities:

Sharing Sets allow sharing of records with users in specific profiles, based on a common field value between the user and the record.

Why Option C is Correct:

A Sharing Set can be configured to grant access to Delivery records where the distributor matches a custom field on the record. This is a scalable solution for partner communities.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option A: Role Hierarchies are limited to three levels for partner users, and this approach does not scale well for 200 distributors.

Option B: Using two sharing rules adds unnecessary complexity and may not handle all scenarios effectively.

For details on Sharing Sets, see Salesforce Partner Community Sharing documentation: https://help.salesforce.com/

With a private sharing model, a criteria-based sharing rule is the most effective way to grant auditors access to specific records like high-value opportunities. Criteria-based sharing rules allow records to be shared with a public group based on defined criteria (e.g., Opportunity Amount > $50,000).

Option A (Correct): Sharing rules are scalable and do not require reconfiguration of the Role Hierarchy or default Opportunity Teams.

Option B: Adding auditors to the default Opportunity Team is inefficient and impractical, as it applies to specific opportunities manually, not automatically for high-value opportunities.

Option C: Placing auditors at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy grants them excessive access to all opportunities, not just high-value ones, violating the principle of least privilege.

In Salesforce, the Role Hierarchy grants record access to users higher in the hierarchy. If the operations users are below the operations manager in the Role Hierarchy and the object’s organization-wide default (OWD) is not "Private," the manager will inherit access to records owned by their subordinates. This approach is automatic and does not require additional sharing rules or groups.

Option A: Ownership-based sharing rules are unnecessary if the Role Hierarchy provides the required access.

Option C: Using a Public Group is an unnecessary workaround for this scenario when Role Hierarchy fulfills the requirement.

Sharing Sets in Customer Communities:

Sharing Sets provide a scalable way to grant access to records based on a user's relationship to the record. In this case, the account contact relationship can be used to determine which distributor accounts the part-time agents can access.

Why Option A is Correct:

Sharing Sets are ideal for Community Plus licenses, allowing access to related distributor accounts without needing complex customization.

Agents can access other distributor accounts through their account contact relationship.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option B (Apex Sharing): Apex Sharing adds unnecessary complexity for this use case when Sharing Sets are sufficient.

Option C (Sharing Rules): Sharing Rules do not work with the account contact relationship in the context of Community Plus licenses.

For more information, see Salesforce Sharing Sets documentation: https://help.salesforce.com/

Mobile-Specific Customization: Salesforce allows overriding standard actions like “Edit” with custom Lightning components that are conditionally applied for mobile or desktop experiences.

Why Option A is Correct:

Overriding the "Edit" action for the mobile view only allows field consultants to use the image capture functionality without affecting desktop users' experience.

This aligns with the requirement to minimize customization while leveraging reusable Lightning Components.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option B: Overriding for all devices and detecting form factors adds unnecessary complexity and could confuse desktop users.

Option C: Adding a separate "Edit in Mobile" button complicates the user interface and training process.

For detailed implementation guidelines, see Salesforce Lightning Component Customization: https://help.salesforce.com/