Free Practice Questions for SAP C_ABAPD_2507 Exam

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In ABAP, when calculating the difference between two date fields (type DATS), the result is directly a type i (integer) representing the difference in days.

Statement B is correct:

data(gv_diff_days) = gs_booking-flight_date - gs_booking-order_date.

This directly subtracts two DATS fields, resulting in an integer value for the number of days difference. No conversion is necessary.

Statements A and D are incorrect because the conv d( ... ) attempts to convert the result back to a DATS type, which is invalid since the result is an integer (number of days), not a date.

Statement C is syntactically correct but would produce the negative of the desired value (flight date - order date). It is semantically incorrect for the use case.

This approach is consistent with ABAP for Cloud Development, which requires explicit typing, and ABAP language version strict mode, where automatic type inference is restricted.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Use ABAP Development Tools (ADT) in Eclipse: For ABAP Cloud development, ADT must be used, and modern object types such as CDS View Entities and Behavior Definitions can only be edited in ADT. This confirms option B.

Use SAP-released/predefined extension points: RAP extensibility is opt-in; every possible extension point must be defined explicitly in the original BO artifacts. Extensions are performed only at these predefined points to ensure lifecycle stability—this is exactly the “use SAP-released extension points” rule. This confirms option A.

In contrast, directly modifying SAP objects is not part of the clean-core, upgrade-stable model for public cloud; extensions must adhere to released APIs and predefined points (therefore C is not correct). The classic Web Dynpro UI technology is not the target for ABAP Cloud development in S/4HANA Cloud public edition (therefore D is not correct). (Context anchored by the extensibility/clean-core guidance above.)

Study-Guide anchors: ABAP Cloud development with ADT only; RAP opt-in extensibility and predefined extension points for cloud-ready, upgrade-safe extensions.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

In ABAP Cloud / RAP, authorization control follows a structured approach:

Read access → can be controlled implicitly via an Access Control object (D).

Create, Update, Delete access → can be controlled both:

Explicitly with AUTHORITY-CHECK (B),

Or implicitly through Access Control object definitions (C).

General implicit control via Access Control (A) or explicit checks for Read (E) are not correct because the system differentiates access levels precisely.

This ensures that business users can only access the data they are authorized for, following RAP’s security-by-default principle.

Verified Study Guide Reference: RAP Security & Access Control Documentation – Authorization in RAP BOs.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

With @Environment.systemField: #SYSTEM_LANGUAGE, the system field sy-langu is automatically supplied as a default value for the parameter.

This works both in ABAP and in view-on-view scenarios (A).

Developers can still override this value when calling the view explicitly (B).

Options C and D are incorrect: system fields are not limited to ABAP only, and overriding is allowed.

Study Guide Reference: ABAP CDS Guide – System Fields in View Parameters.