Free Practice Questions for Paloalto Networks SSE-Engineer Exam

When multitenancy is enabled in Prisma Access (Managed by Panorama), a key characteristic is the isolation of resources between tenants. Palo Alto Networks documentation emphasizes that each tenant operates within its own logically separate Prisma Access environment. This includes dedicated compute instances, ensuring that the performance and security of one tenant are not impacted by the activities of another.

Let's analyze why the other options are incorrect based on official documentation:

A. Service connection licenses will be assigned only to the first tenant, and these service connections can be shared with the other tenants. This statement is incorrect. In a multitenant Prisma Access deployment, licenses are typically managed and allocated per tenant. While the underlying infrastructure might be shared by Palo Alto Networks, the logical resources and often the licensing are segmented for each tenant. Sharing service connections across completely separate tenants would violate the principle of tenant isolation.  

B. A single tenant cannot consist solely of mobile users or solely of remote networks. This statement is incorrect. Prisma Access multitenancy allows for flexibility in how tenants are configured. A tenant can be designed to exclusively serve mobile users, exclusively connect remote networks, or a combination of both, depending on the organizational structure and requirements.  

D. There is flexibility to manage different tenants using separate Panoramas, which allows for better organization and management of the multiple tenants. While it is possible to have multiple Panorama instances managing different parts of a large infrastructure, when discussing multitenancy within a single Prisma Access instance (as implied by the question "enabling multitenancy in Prisma Access (Managed by Panorama))", all configured tenants are managed by that single Panorama instance. Managing different tenants with separate Panoramas is a different architectural consideration, not a defining characteristic of enabling multitenancy within one Prisma Access deployment managed by a specific Panorama.

Therefore, the defining characteristic of Prisma Access multitenancy (Managed by Panorama) is the allocation of dedicated Prisma Access instances and compute resources for each tenant, ensuring logical separation and resource isolation

TheBGP peernot coming up despite anestablished IPSec tunnelindicates a potentialBGP configuration issue.

Secret– IfMD5 authenticationis configured for BGP, both Prisma Access and theCustomer Premises Equipment (CPE)must have thesame secret (authentication key). A mismatch will prevent BGP from establishing a session.

Peer AS Number– TheAutonomous System (AS) numberof the BGP peer must match what is expected on both sides of the connection. If the AS number is incorrect, the BGP session will fail to establish.

By verifying these elements, the engineer can troubleshoot and establish a successfulBGP peering sessionover theIPSec tunnel.

In aPanorama Managed Prisma Access multitenant environment,Access Domainsprovide granularrole-based access control (RBAC). By defining anAccess Domain, the network security team can be granted full administrative privileges for aspecific tenant's configurationwhile ensuring theycannot access or modify other tenants. This method enforces proper segmentation andensures compliance with multitenant security policies.

The"400 Bad Request"error when attemptingSAML authenticationthrough theCloud Identity Engine (CIE)suggests amisconfiguration in the SAML metadata. This typically occurs when theendpoint URLs, certificates, or entity IDsdo not match betweenCloud Identity Engine and the IdP portal. To resolve this, verify that:

TheSAML metadatauploaded toCloud Identity Enginematches theconfiguration from the IdP.

TheACS (Assertion Consumer Service) URL, Entity ID, and certificateare correctly set.

There are no incorrect or expired certificates in theCloud Identity Engine and IdP configuration.

By ensuring theSAML metadatais properly configured inboth systems, authentication should proceed without errors.

When a large branch office experiences a high volume of employees logging in within a short time frame, the following apply:

Maximum pending TCP DNS requests is 64– This means that Prisma Access can queue up to 64 pending DNS requests over TCP before dropping additional requests. If more requests are received simultaneously, some may fail or experience delays.

Maximum number of TCP DNS retries is 3– If a DNS request fails over TCP, Prisma Access will attempt to retry the request up to three times before failing over to another method or returning an error.

Updating theCloud Services plugininPrisma Accessdoes not disrupt existing traffic flows because the upgrade process is designed to beseamless and transparent. Prisma Access ensures high availability by maintainingactive sessions and policieswhile applying the update in the background. This allows ongoing connections to continue without interruptions, minimizing impact on user experience.

TheStrata Logging Serviceallowslog replay, which enables resending logs that were not successfully forwarded to an external syslog server due to disruptions. By configuring areplay profilewith the affected time range and associating it with thesyslog server profile, Prisma Access will resend the missing logs, ensuring that all relevant data is restored in the external logging system. This approach is the most efficient and automated way to recover missing logs.

Strata Copilotenhances the capabilities ofPrisma Access security teamsby providingAI-powered insights and recommendationsto help resolve security issues efficiently. It analyzessecurity events, misconfigurations, and alertsand offerscontextual guidancewithrecommended next stepsfor troubleshooting and improving security posture. This assists teams inquickly identifying and addressing security challengeswithout requiring deep manual investigation.

By usingsecurity checks under posture settingsinStrata Cloud Manager (SCM), the senior engineer can enforcepolicy compliance standardsbyautomatically denyingany security policy that does notalign with best practices. This ensures that junior engineers can create policies while preventing configurations that might introduce security gaps. This proactive approacheliminates manual oversightand enforces compliance at the time of policy creation, reducing risk and ensuring consistent security enforcement.