Free Practice Questions for PRINCE2 PRINCE2-7-Practitioner Exam

The correct answer is A . The purpose of the business case is to provide the information needed to determine whether the project represents a desirable, viable, and achievable investment. Developing that justification requires the project to evaluate credible alternatives rather than assuming that the initially proposed solution is automatically the optimum investment.

The option without the underground car park is described as credible. It is therefore appropriate for the project manager to include an investment appraisal of that option so that decision-makers can compare its costs, benefits, risks, dis-benefits, and overall value with those of the preferred solution. The main contractor’s objection does not remove the project’s responsibility to examine legitimate business alternatives; supplier preferences must not determine investment justification.

Option B is incorrect because PRINCE2 does not impose a universal requirement for customer and supplier organizations to maintain completely separate business cases. Option C incorrectly treats initial scope as immutable. During development of the business case, alternative configurations can be evaluated when this helps determine the most appropriate investment. Option D similarly assumes that one anticipated benefit—parking income—precludes examination of other options. A benefit is an input to investment appraisal, not a reason to suppress alternatives.

The scenario therefore demonstrates objective option appraisal as part of sound business justification.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Business case practice; business options; investment appraisal; justification; desirability, viability and achievability; initiating a project.

===============

The correct answer is B . PRINCE2 product-based planning determines the logical sequence of work by examining the products to be created and the dependencies between those products . Once those relationships are understood, activities or work packages that do not depend on one another can legitimately be scheduled in parallel.

In this scenario, the project manager and BuildyBrick’s planning specialist use the product flow together with historical information from previous projects. This is appropriate because the product flow provides the dependency logic, while previous project data can improve the realism of estimates and planning decisions. If the utilities and systems products are independent, separate work packages can therefore proceed concurrently.

Option A is incorrect because historical information should inform planning but cannot replace dependency analysis. A schedule should be derived from the logical relationships between products rather than copied mechanically from previous projects. Option C introduces a restriction that PRINCE2 does not impose: products delivered by the same supplier do not automatically need to be produced sequentially. Option D confuses tolerances , which establish delegated performance limits, with dependencies, which determine the logical production sequence.

The scenario is therefore a valid example of using product-based planning to identify opportunities for parallel delivery without compromising dependency logic.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Plans practice; product-based planning; product flow; dependencies; scheduling; work packages; lessons from previous projects.

===============

The correct answer is C — Project assurance . Project assurance exists to provide the project board with confidence that the project is being conducted appropriately and remains consistent with the interests represented by the board. Assurance includes reviewing whether plans remain realistic, feasible, aligned with agreed objectives, and suitable for supporting project-board decision-making.

Here, BuildyBrick has supplied new information showing that protecting historic buildings will increase the planned duration. Before relying on the revised plan, the project manager needs confidence that it remains appropriate from the perspective of both the project board and the wider business. Consulting project assurance is therefore appropriate because assurance can independently review the plan against agreed objectives, targets, tolerances, business justification, and applicable organizational requirements.

Option A is incorrect because the business layer establishes strategic direction and commissions the project rather than routinely reviewing detailed project planning changes on behalf of the board. Option B is concerned primarily with specialist product delivery at team level. Option D is plausible because the project executive represents the business interest, but the question specifically concerns checking that a revised plan meets project-board and business needs. That independent review and confidence-giving function is characteristic of project assurance.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Organization practice; project assurance; project board; project planning; business interest; initiating a project.

===============

The correct answer is B . PRINCE2 distinguishes the business layer from the project management layer. The business layer commissions projects, establishes the broader organizational context, and appoints an appropriate project executive who will represent the business interest and become ultimately accountable for the project’s success within the project board.

The scenario explicitly states that the LOB Portfolio Director is acting at the business layer . Consequently, selecting and appointing an appropriate project executive is consistent with the responsibilities associated with that level of governance.

Option A is too broad. The appointment is not appropriate merely because the Mayor can delegate the activity to any senior stakeholder. The suitability arises because the Portfolio Director is acting as the relevant business-layer representative. Option C incorrectly assumes that the Mayor must personally make the appointment because of the project’s civic significance; PRINCE2 does not impose such a requirement. Option D similarly assigns the responsibility automatically to the Head of Portfolio Office, even though the scenario explicitly identifies the Portfolio Director as the relevant business-layer representative.

The key distinction is therefore between business-layer governance and project-level management. The project executive is appointed from the business layer and subsequently leads the project board.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Organization practice; business layer; project executive; commissioning a project; project board structure and accountability.

===============

The correct answer is B . Selecting the project approach during starting up a project is intended to establish an appropriate basis for how the project will be delivered before the organization commits significant resources to initiation. The delivery method and use of external suppliers can materially influence management controls, commercial arrangements, quality, sustainability, communication, risk, and other management approaches subsequently developed during initiation.

The team has identified an uncertainty arising directly from its proposed approach: a traditional delivery model combined with external suppliers may make sustainability requirements more difficult to achieve. Recording this early in the project log is appropriate because risks, issues, lessons, and other relevant information identified during starting up should not be ignored simply because detailed management approaches have not yet been completed.

Option A is too narrow. Clarifying contractual obligations may be relevant, but it is not the primary rationale demonstrated here. Option C incorrectly suggests that a manageable risk should be deferred; early identification allows it to influence initiation planning and development of the PID. Option D creates a false choice. Sustainability expectations may indeed inform quality requirements, but an uncertainty concerning whether the delivery approach will enable those requirements to be achieved is still legitimately a risk.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Starting up a project; select the project approach; project log; early risk identification; sustainability; project initiation documentation.

===============

The correct answer is C . PRINCE2 7 treats people, relationships, collaboration, and effective communication as integral to successful project delivery. The project manager is not limited to monitoring work package completion; the role also involves maintaining an environment in which teams can coordinate their work, resolve dependencies, share information, and sustain effective working relationships.

The scenario identifies the underlying cause of delay: the survey and utilities teams are not sharing information required by other teams. Rejecting a short coordination forum solely because it consumes delivery time fails to address that root cause. A concise, structured forum can reduce downstream delay by exposing dependencies, clarifying outstanding information, and enabling team managers to resolve problems before they affect additional products.

Option A incorrectly transfers responsibility for overall project-team coordination entirely to individual team managers. Option B focuses on meeting time without considering the greater cost of continued information failure. Option D is also inappropriate because an exception report is required when a forecast indicates that agreed tolerances will be exceeded, not merely because coordination problems have arisen. The project manager should first use proportionate management action within delegated authority.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: People element; leading successful teams; communication; collaboration; relationships; managing product delivery.

===============

The correct answer is A . Effective change management requires the project to understand who will be affected by the change, who can influence it, and what relationships may need active management. PRINCE2 7 therefore supports proactive stakeholder identification rather than waiting until stakeholders independently approach the project.

The Heritage Manager already possesses useful knowledge from previous work. Using that knowledge during initiation enables the project manager to identify heritage-protection groups early, assess their likely interests and influence, and determine suitable engagement and communication activities. Their anticipated opposition makes early identification more important, not less important, because potential concerns can be understood before they develop into avoidable resistance, issues, or reputational problems.

Option B is incorrect because identifying a stakeholder does not guarantee support. Stakeholder analysis provides information that enables appropriate engagement; it cannot predetermine stakeholder attitudes. Option C is also incorrect because stakeholder identification is appropriate during initiation and should continue throughout the project as circumstances change. Option D assumes that contact or identification necessarily increases opposition, which is unsupported. Early engagement may instead clarify concerns, reveal constraints, and improve the project’s ability to manage change.

The scenario therefore demonstrates proactive use of organizational knowledge to strengthen the project’s understanding of its stakeholder environment.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: People; leading successful change; stakeholder identification; stakeholder analysis; communication; organizational ecosystem.

===============

The correct answer is D . Under PRINCE2, the project manager is responsible for preparing stage plans , irrespective of whether most specialist delivery during a particular stage is undertaken by an external supplier. A stage plan is a management-level control document used by the project manager and project board to manage and authorize the relevant management stage.

Supplier team managers can and should contribute detailed planning information. They may prepare team plans where appropriate and provide estimates, resource requirements, dependencies, schedules, risks, and detailed information concerning their work packages. Those inputs support preparation of the stage plan but do not transfer ownership of the management-stage plan to the supplier.

Option A incorrectly equates delivery of most stage products with ownership of the stage plan. Option B introduces an unsupported distinction based on the number of suppliers involved. Option C goes even further by asserting that every external supplier should prepare the complete stage plan for the stage in which it operates. That would blur the distinction between project management control and specialist delivery responsibility.

The planning hierarchy remains important: the project manager plans and controls the management stage, while team managers plan and execute the detailed specialist work delegated through work packages.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Plans practice; stage plans; team plans; project manager responsibilities; team manager responsibilities; work packages; management versus specialist products.

===============

The correct mapping is Item 1 — A; Item 2 — B; Item 3 — D .

Item 1 belongs under Quality method. It specifies how the required quality criterion will be verified: specialist equipment will measure whether the panels achieve the applicable energy-output standard. The method identifies the technique used to conduct the quality activity.

Item 2 belongs under Dates. It states when the quality activity is scheduled to occur—week 2 of stage 4—and also relates its timing to another quality activity, the security-system test.

Item 3 belongs under Result. It records the outcome of the completed test, specifically that one panel failed to satisfy the required energy-output standard. This is the actual result of the quality activity rather than its planned method or timing.

The remaining headings perform different functions. Responsibilities identify those accountable for carrying out, reviewing, or approving the quality activity. Records identify or reference the evidence and documentation produced as a consequence of the quality activity.

The quality register therefore provides an operational record of planned and completed quality activities, supporting traceability between what was to be tested, how and when it was tested, who was involved, and what outcome was obtained.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Quality practice; quality register; quality methods; quality-control activities; quality results; records and responsibilities.

===============