Free Practice Questions for PMI PMI-ACP Exam

The correct answer is D – Facilitate a product development roadmap workshop. Engaging stakeholders early through a roadmap workshop helps align expectations, prioritize outcomes, and build shared understanding around value delivery.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Product roadmaps provide a high-level view of deliverables and timing. Facilitating roadmap workshops ensures that all stakeholders contribute to and align with the vision.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.4 – Product Roadmap and Planning)

Mike Griffiths further explains:

“Roadmap workshops allow stakeholders to discuss release priorities and business goals, ensuring engagement in the planning process and continuous alignment throughout the project.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Incorrect options:

A reflects a waterfall mindset.

B involves team-level planning, not broad stakeholder engagement.

C is informative but not collaborative or sufficient for planning.

Answer: D

────────────────────────────────────

In Kanban, lead time is a key performance indicator (KPI) that should be regularly monitored. Lead time measures the amount of time it takes for a work item to move from the start of the process to its completion. By monitoring lead time, the team lead can assess how efficiently work is flowing through the system and identify areas where bottlenecks or delays may be occurring. Reducing lead time is one of the primary goals in Kanban to improve overall process efficiency and delivery speed.

Predictable flow in agile is achieved by reducing variability in story size and complexity. According to the PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.7: Flow-based Agile and Kanban), working with small, similarly sized user stories increases throughput predictability and improves cycle time.

Mike Griffiths in the PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Value-Driven Delivery) supports breaking large stories into smaller, testable chunks as a way to stabilize delivery and forecasting.

Option A is correct: small user stories reduce variability and support predictable flow.

Option B supports testability but doesn’t directly improve flow.

Option C and D are too broad or conceptual to specifically improve predictability.

The correct answer is B – Prioritizing stories.

The MoSCoW method is a prioritization technique used in Agile to categorize requirements and backlog items based on their business value. It helps stakeholders and teams agree on what is essential to deliver versus what is desirable or optional.

MoSCoW stands for:

M – Must have

S – Should have

C – Could have

W – Won’t have (this time)

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“The MoSCoW prioritization method helps stakeholders classify backlog items based on their criticality and desired delivery timing. This enables better alignment with business objectives.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.2 – Prioritization)

Mike Griffiths explains:

“MoSCoW is a simple but effective method for clarifying which features are essential and which can be deferred. It enhances transparency during prioritization discussions.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 3 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Why the other options are incorrect:

A – Estimating story size involves techniques like planning poker or T-shirt sizing.

C – Product validation is done via demos, acceptance criteria, and stakeholder feedback.

D – Progress tracking uses tools like burndown charts or cumulative flow diagrams.

Answer: B

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

The correct answer is A – Kaizen. Kaizen is a Japanese term meaning " continuous improvement. " In Agile, Kaizen refers to the practice of regularly reflecting on processes and results, then making incremental improvements. By tracking impediments and resolving them transparently, the team engages in Kaizen behavior.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile teams embrace a mindset of continuous improvement (Kaizen), regularly inspecting their work and processes and adapting them for better outcomes.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 6.6 – Continuous Improvement)

Mike Griffiths writes:

“Agile is rooted in lean thinking, including Kaizen. Teams reflect on what went well and what needs to change, often using tools like Kanban boards to visualize and track improvements.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 7 – Continuous Improvement)

Incorrect options:

B refers to goal-setting, not process improvement.

C are metrics, not an outcome of experimentation.

D (Muda) refers to waste, which Kaizen seeks to reduce.

Answer: A

────────────────────────────────────

The correct answer is B – A product backlog should be created to list the project requirements from all of the project stakeholders.

In Agile, the product backlog serves as a living document where requirements, user stories, and stakeholder feedback are continuously refined. It is the central mechanism for capturing and prioritizing stakeholder needs and ensuring that business value is delivered incrementally.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“The product backlog is a prioritized list of work for the development team that is derived from stakeholder input, user stories, and emerging needs. It evolves as the project progresses and stakeholder feedback is incorporated.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.2 – Product Backlog)

Mike Griffiths writes:

“Product backlogs provide transparency into stakeholder priorities. They enable the team to continuously align work with customer expectations and business needs.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 3 – Stakeholder Engagement)

Why the other options are incorrect:

A refers to the traditional project charter, which is not commonly updated throughout the agile life cycle.

C is a misunderstanding—the Agile Manifesto is a set of principles, not a project-specific document.

D misuses user stories; stories are used for functional requirements, not stakeholder profiles.

Answer: B

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

Stakeholder participation, especially during sprint reviews, is critical to agile success. The PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 7.2: Stakeholder Engagement) emphasizes the importance of actively engaging stakeholders throughout the project lifecycle, particularly during key ceremonies like sprint reviews, where feedback shapes the product.

Mike Griffiths in the PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 4: Stakeholder Engagement) states that stakeholders need to understand the value of their input and how it influences product direction. The agile practitioner or Scrum Master should educate and influence stakeholders by demonstrating the tangible impact of their participation.

Option D is correct: aligning stakeholders with the benefits of engagement fosters participation.

Option A, B, and C are passive substitutes and don’t address the root issue of stakeholder disengagement.

The ideal way to resolve the conflict is to encourage the team to brainstorm and propose an alternative solution that meets the intent of the architect’s request (error logging) but with a solution that fits within the current release timeline. By implementing error logging at the client level, the team can still address the monitoring and logging needs without significantly delaying the release. This approach fosters collaboration, balances priorities, and focuses on delivering value within the agreed timeline.

The correct answer is D – It helps to quickly resolve issues using the sponsor ' s influence. A sponsor ' s presence in Scrum ceremonies (like sprint reviews or retrospectives) helps escalate and resolve high-level issues, remove organizational blockers, and reinforce alignment between the team and the business.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Active sponsor engagement can accelerate issue resolution, remove organizational impediments, and provide vital support to the team. Sponsors are valuable allies in ensuring team success and organizational alignment.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 4.2 – Stakeholder Engagement)

Mike Griffiths explains:

“When sponsors are visible and engaged, teams benefit from faster decision-making, quicker escalation of issues, and improved morale. Their influence can break through bureaucratic barriers.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 3 – Stakeholder Engagement)

Incorrect options:

A misattributes sprint discipline to sponsor involvement—this is a team responsibility.

B is passive and doesn’t reflect tangible benefits.

C is useful but not the primary advantage of sponsor participation.

Answer: D

────────────────────────────────────

The correct answer is D – Reestimate all stories including values for A, B, and C. Agile promotes empirical process control, meaning teams adapt based on what they learn. When significant deviations are found in actual effort vs. story point estimates, the team should revisit and refine their estimation process, including reestimating stories to better align with reality.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Estimates are revisited based on experience. Teams inspect and adapt during retrospectives, using data to improve future estimation accuracy.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Estimation and Planning)

Mike Griffiths writes:

“When estimates prove inaccurate, teams should reestimate affected stories. Estimating is a collaborative process, and learning from past deviations is a key part of adaptive planning.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Incorrect options:

A may distort estimation by comparison and not correct the root issue.

B manipulates velocity data and violates agile principles of transparency.

C attempts to “force fit” effort rather than inspect and adapt.

Answer: D

────────────────────────────────────