Free Practice Questions for PMI PMI-ACP Exam

Agile promotes maintaining the integrity of the sprint commitment once it begins. According to the PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.4: Sprint Planning and Managing Change), new requirements discovered mid-sprint should be added to the product backlog and reprioritized for a future sprint unless they are critical blockers.

Mike Griffiths in the PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 7: Problem Detection and Resolution) explains that backlog management is key to handling emerging work. Agile teams should not reactively shift focus, as it disrupts flow and predictability.

Option B is correct: placing the new requirement in the backlog respects sprint boundaries and ensures proper prioritization.

Option A disrupts sprint scope mid-course.

Option C is unnecessary unless the issue is blocking progress.

Option D violates the principle of sprint focus and planning discipline.

In Scrum, the goal is to have open discussions during estimation, where all team members, including junior developers, can express their thoughts and assumptions. The Scrum Master should encourage the junior developers to keep their estimations because these can highlight different perspectives, constraints, or assumptions that others may not have considered. This helps create a more comprehensive understanding of the work and fosters a collaborative environment. It also builds confidence in junior team members, allowing them to contribute more effectively and learn from their peers in the process.

In a newly formed team, especially in a regulated environment like pharmaceuticals, guiding the team to collaborate effectively and share knowledge is essential. As the team lacks subject matter expertise, fostering an environment of continuous learning and collaboration will help them quickly build knowledge and improve their performance.

It is crucial to organize a meeting to clarify roles and responsibilities. This ensures everyone understands their individual contributions and how they relate to the team’s goals. Clear role definitions are particularly important in a cross-functional team to avoid confusion and ensure smooth collaboration.

To ensure a smooth transition to SAFe, the agile team lead should have an open discussion with the team about what will change and the reasons behind these changes. Establishing a clear understanding of the transition process and addressing any concerns proactively helps alleviate fears and encourages buy-in. It ' s also important to discuss the timeline for the transition and how the team will adapt. By providing clarity and a process for addressing concerns, the team will feel more comfortable and confident in adopting the new methodology.

In agile, information radiators—such as visual boards placed in common areas—are used to make project data accessible, transparent, and real-time. According to the PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 7.1 Communication), visibility improves coordination across interdependent teams.

Mike Griffiths in the PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 4: Stakeholder Engagement) recommends that agile teams use visible, shared artifacts such as task boards, burn charts, or Kanban walls to improve cross-team communication and reduce friction.

Option B is correct: a physical or virtual board offers transparency and encourages informal communication.

Option A is useful but not as effective for rapid visibility.

Option C is one-way and doesn’t support real-time updates.

Option D is reactive and could cause delays or misalignment.

In Agile, continuous integration and regression testing should be part of every iteration to ensure that the product is always in a potentially shippable state. These practices help catch issues early in the development process, preventing defects from accumulating and becoming harder to fix later. By integrating and testing frequently, the team ensures that new code works with existing code and that the product maintains its quality throughout the development lifecycle. This approach aligns with Agile principles of delivering working software regularly and maintaining high-quality standards throughout each iteration.

The team lead should facilitate a constructive discussion by restating both perspectives clearly, which can help ensure that all team members understand each other ' s viewpoints. Asking for more details about both approaches allows the team to analyze each method ' s pros and cons, fostering a collaborative, solution-focused discussion. Creating a chart of similarities and differences can provide a visual representation that helps the team make an informed decision, highlighting which elements from both approaches might be beneficial. This approach encourages open communication, avoids escalation, and leads to a productive exploration of options without dismissing either side.

The correct answer is D — Explain to the team the importance of reducing team size by reducing specializations and bottlenecks and that every team member plays an equal part.

Agile promotes cross-functional, self-organizing teams where all members are responsible for delivering a working product increment. Avoiding specialized silos reduces bottlenecks and improves overall flow. Everyone contributes based on team needs, not personal preferences or status.

PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile teams minimize individual silos by encouraging cross-functional collaboration. Everyone contributes to the team goal, even if the task is outside their core skillset.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 6.1 – Team Composition)

Mike Griffiths:

“Specialization often becomes a bottleneck in agile teams. Agile promotes generalizing specialists—team members who are willing to stretch outside their expertise to help the team meet its goals.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 4 – Team Performance)

Incorrect options:

A promotes a command-and-control model—contrary to Agile servant leadership.

B reinforces silos and inefficiency.

C contradicts Agile’s emphasis on team ownership.

Answer: D

—

Step 1: Identify Total Story Points in the Backlog

From the backlog table:

Total story points = 6 + 4 + 8 + 4 + 21 + 7 + 5 + 9 + 3 + 5 = 72

Step 2: Determine the Team ' s Velocity

The risk register mentions a burn reduction of 1 story point per sprint from sprint 4 to sprint 6 due to a holiday schedule. However, assuming a normal velocity of 5 story points per sprint, we can estimate sprint completion.

Normal sprint velocity: 5 story points per sprint

Reduced velocity for sprints 4-6: 4 story points per sprint

Step 3: Calculate Total Sprints Needed

First 3 sprints: 5 points per sprint → 5 × 3 = 15 story points completed

Sprints 4-6: 4 points per sprint → 4 × 3 = 12 story points completed

Remaining story points after sprint 6: 72 - (15 + 12) = 45 story points

Remaining sprints needed at normal velocity (5 story points per sprint): 45 ÷ 5 = 9 sprints

Total Sprints Required

Sprints 1-6: Already planned.

Additional 9 sprints needed.

Total sprints to complete the backlog: 6 + 9 = 15 sprints.

Agile promotes cross-functional teams and reducing bottlenecks through knowledge sharing and skill development. The PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 4.3.3: Cross-functional Teams) recommends that team members develop T-shaped skills to handle more types of work. Mike Griffiths in the PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 3: Team Performance) advocates for skill broadening to improve team throughput and resilience.

Option A is correct: cross-training removes dependencies and improves flow.

Option B delays action and prolongs the issue.

Option C reduces delivery capacity rather than addressing the root cause.

Option D arbitrarily limits scope and doesn’t resolve the underlying skill gap.