Pre-Summer Sale Special - Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: sntaclus

Scenario 6: Davis Clinic (DC) is an American medical center focused on integrated health care. Since its establishment DC was committed to providing qualitative services for its clients, which is the reason why the company decided to implement a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. After a year of having an active QMS in place, DC applied for a certification audit.

A team of five auditors, from a well-known certification body, was selected to conduct the audit. Eva was appointed as the audit team leader. After three days of auditing, the team gathered to review and examine their findings. They also discussed the audit findings with DC's top management and then drafted the audit conclusions.

In the closing meeting, which was held between the audit team and the top management of DC. Eva presented two nonconformities that were detected during the audit. Eva stated that the company did not retain documented information regarding its outsourced services for an analysis laboratory and regarding the conducted management reviews. During the closing meeting, the audit team required from DCs top management to come up with corrective action plans within two weeks. Although the top management did not agree with the audit findings, the audit team insisted that the auditee must submit corrective actions within the given time frame in order for the audit activities to continue.

Once the action plans were evaluated, the audit team began preparing the audit report. Eva required from the team to provide accurate descriptions of the audit findings and the audit conclusions. The report was then distributed to all the interested parties involved in the audit, including the certification body Based on the report, the certification body together with Eva, as the audit team leader, made the certification decision.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Scenario 6 indicates that although the top management did not agree with the audit findings, the audit team began preparing the audit report. Is this acceptable?

A.

No, the audit report should have been prepared before the audit findings were presented in the closing meeting

B.

No, during the closing meeting, the audit team had to inform the auditee about the complaint and appeal handling process

C.

Yes, the audit team had to begin preparing the audit report although the top management did not agree with the audit findings

During a third-party audit of a pharmaceutical organisation (CD9000) site of seven COVID-19 testing laboratories in various terminals at

a major international airport, you interview the CD 9000's General Manager (GM), who was accompanied by Jack, the legal compliance

expert. Jack is acting as the guide in the absence of the Technical Manager due to him contracting COVID-19.

You: "What external and internal issues have been identified that could affect CD9000 and its quality management system?"

GM: "Jack guided us on this. We identified issues like probable competition of another laboratory organisation in the airport, legal

requirements on COVID-19 continuously changing, the shortage of competent laboratory analysists, the epidemic declining soon,

shortage of chemicals for the analysis. It was quite a good experience."

You: "Did you document these issues?"

GM: "No. Jack said that ISO 9001 does not require us to document these issues."

You: "How did you determine the risks associated with the issues and did you plan actions to address them?"

GM: "I am not sure. The Technical Manager is responsible for this process. Jack may be able to answer this question in his absence."

Select two options for how you would respond to the General Manager's suggestion:

A.

I would not accept the legal compliance expert answering the question.

B.

I would ask to audit the Technical Manager by phone.

C.

I would delay the audit until the return of the technical manager

D.

I would look for evidence that the actions resulting from the risk assessment had been taken.

E.

I would ask for a different guide instead of the legal compliance expert.

F.

I would ask the consultant to leave the meeting since he is not an employee of the organisation.

Which quality management principle does an organization fulfill when it assesses risks, consequences, and impacts before taking action?

A.

Process approach

B.

Leadership

C.

Improvement

D.

Relationship management

You are leading a Stage 2 certification audit of a multi-site organisation and have received the audit schedule below;

Head Office and Site 1 – Day 1

Site 2 (150 km from HQ) – Days 2 and 3

During Day 1 of the audit, the client informs you that the laboratory at Site 2 has been closed for decontamination due to a serious outbreak of an infectious disease among workers. In Site 2, all other functions could be audited as planned.

As the audit team leader, what would you do?

Choose the best acceptable action you could take:

A.

Immediately cancel the audit since the audit plan cannot be completed.

B.

Complete the audit on day 3 and report back to the certification body for a certification decision.

C.

Ask the audit Programme Manager for direction.

D.

Continue the audit on days 2 and 3 and return later to audit the Site 2 laboratory.

XYZ Corporation is an organisation that employs 100 people. As audit team leader, you are conducting a

certification audit at Stage 1. When reviewing the quality management system (QMS) documentation, you

find that quality objectives have been set for every employee in the organisation except top management.

The Quality Manager complains that this has created a lot of resistance to the QMS, and the Chief Executive

is asking questions about how much it will cost. He asks for your opinion on whether this is the correct

method of setting objectives.

Three months after Stage 1, you return to XYZ Corporation to conduct a Stage 2 certification audit as Audit

Team Leader with one other auditor. You find that the Quality Manager has cancelled the previous quality

objectives for all employees and replaced them with a single objective for himself. This states that "The

Quality Manager will drive multiple improvements in the QMS in the next year". The Quality Manager indicates

that this gives him the authority to issue instructions to department managers when quality improvement is

needed. He says that this approach has the full backing of senior management. He shows you the latest

Quality Improvement Request that was included in the last management review.

After further auditing, the issues below were found. Select two statements that apply to the term

`nonconformity'.

A.

No quality objectives planned for the top management team

B.

Decisions on improvement action timescales not involving departmental managers.

C.

Evaluation of the results of the improvement action not always documented by the Quality Manager.

D.

Limited knowledge of the content of Quality Improvement Requests by departmental staff.

E.

Quality improvements not aligning with the quality policy.

F.

Top management claim not to be aware of the improvement request (QI/12/20/HR-3) initiated by the Quality Manager.

What is a combined audit?

A.

Two or more management systems audited together at a single auditee.

B.

Two or more auditing organizations cooperating to audit a single auditee.

C.

Two or more management systems audited simultaneously at several auditees.

Whistlekleen is a national dry cleaning and laundry company with 50 shops. You are conducting a surveillance audit of the Head Office and are sampling customer complaints. 80% of complaints originate from five shops in the same region. Most of these complaints relate to customer laundry not being cleaned as customers require. The Quality Manager tells you that these are the oldest shops in the company. The cleaning equipment needs replacing but the company cannot afford it now. You learn that the shop managers were told to dismiss most of the complaints because of the poor quality of the laundered materials.

On raising the matter with senior management, you are told that there are plans to replace the equipment in these shops over the next five years.

You raised a nonconformity against clause 8.5.1 of ISO 9001.

Based on the scenario, select the three options which best describe the evidence for raising such a nonconformity.

A.

The management failed in planning to replace obsolete equipment.

B.

The operators did not check the laundry before release to the customer.

C.

The operators did not check the condition of the customer’s product upon receipt.

D.

Shop managers were told to make excuses to customers with complaints.

E.

The organisation failed to control the laundry operations in 5 shops adequately.

F.

Customer complaints are not taken seriously by the organisation.

G.

The organisation failed to maintain all of its equipment to an adequate standard.

Select one option that must be considered when determining the scope of a QMS to ISO 9001.

A.

Business improvement

B.

Performance of business processes

C.

External issues of the organisation's context

D.

Competence of top management

Select the term which best describes the quality management system process of modifying a non-conforming product to bring it within acceptance criteria.

A.

Concession

B.

Correction

C.

Corrective action

D.

Preventive action

Scenario 4:

TD Advertising is a print management company based in Chicago. The company offers design services, digital printing, storage, and distribution. As TD expanded, its management recognized that success depended on adopting new technologies and improving quality.

To ensure customer satisfaction and quality improvement, the company decided to pursue ISO 9001 certification.

After implementing the QMS, TD hired a well-known certification body for an audit. Anne Key was appointed as the audit team leader. She received a document listing the audit team members, audit scope, criteria, duration, and audit engagement limits.

Anne reviewed the document and approved the audit mandate. The certification body and TD’s top management signed the certification agreement.

Before contacting TD, Anne reviewed the audit scope and noticed that TD made changes to it due to the adoption of new printing equipment. However, Anne disagreed with the changes, stating they would affect the audit timeline. She considered withdrawing from the audit.

In scenario 4, the audit team determined the audit feasibility by considering only the resources available for the audit. Is this acceptable?

A.

No, the audit feasibility should be determined by TD’s top management.

B.

No, because other factors should be considered when determining the audit feasibility, such as information needed to plan the audit, the cooperation of the auditee, duration of the audit, etc.

C.

Yes, considering only the resources available for the audit is sufficient for determining the audit feasibility.

D.

Yes, because the audit team leader has final authority over audit feasibility.