Free Practice Questions for PECB ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam

Audit reports should focus on objective evidence, observations, and findings relevant to the management system and the audit process. Personal opinions, unrelated remarks, or derogatory comments are inappropriate.

Analysis of Statements:

A. The guide was trying to be helpful and would not stop talking during the audit:Incorrect. This is irrelevant to the audit findings or conclusions.

B. The Sales Manager was kind and seems to be a nice person:Incorrect. Personal opinions about individuals are not appropriate in audit reports.

C. The audit client’s objectives for this audit were never realistic. That’s why we were unable to complete the audit plan:Correct. This is relevant as it relates to the audit process and highlights challenges in meeting objectives.

D. The maintenance team could not replace a lightbulb, let alone an air conditioning unit:Incorrect. This is derogatory and irrelevant to the audit report.

E. The OHS Management team were extremely helpful and went out of their way to facilitate access to required records:Correct. This is a valid observation about cooperation during the audit process.

F. The OHS Manager disagreed with me in respect of all of the nonconformances I raised. He still does not accept any of them:Incorrect. While disagreements may occur, this statement is overly subjective and not constructive.

G. The Production Manager is lucky to have a job as he does not appear to understand how anything works around here:Incorrect. Personal attacks or irrelevant judgments have no place in the report.

H. The Sales Manager said he had forgotten the password to the Sales Ordering system and so too had everyone else in his department:Correct. This relates to system access and could indicate a nonconformance or an opportunity for improvement.

ISO References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.7: Reporting audit results.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Corrections address immediate issues, such as errors or omissions, without addressing root causes. Clause 10.2 of ISO 45001:2018 allows for corrections alongside corrective actions.

Analysis of Options:

A. Adding a missing signature to a corrective action record:Correct. This is a correction addressing an administrative oversight.

B. Changing a process to reduce its inherent risk:Incorrect. This is a corrective action aimed at addressing root causes, not a correction.

C. Changing the name of a tutor that did not deliver a course to the name of the tutor that did:Correct. This corrects an error in records without addressing systemic issues.

D. Reviewing workers’ training records:Incorrect. This is part of ongoing monitoring or auditing, not a correction.

E. Updating the emergency preparedness plan as a result of carrying out a practical test:Incorrect. This is a corrective action resulting from performance evaluation, not a correction.

F. Using OHSMS induction training to address an identified lack of OHSMS awareness among workers:Incorrect. This is a preventive or corrective action, not a correction.

ISO References:

Clause 10.2: Nonconformity and corrective action.

Clause 7.5: Control of documented information

A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated

Explanation

Documented information on the organization’s legal requirements → Clause 6.1.3:Clause 6.1.3 requires the organization to identify, document, and maintain compliance obligations, including legal and other requirements relevant to OH&S.

Assessment of OH&S risks → Clause 6.1.2.2:Clause 6.1.2.2 mandates the organization to assess OH&S risks associated with its operations, taking into account hazards, controls, and work activities.

Internal and external issue determination → Clause 4.1:Clause 4.1 requires organizations to determine internal and external issues that affect the OH&S management system and its intended outcomes.

Agreements with the organization’s external providers → Clause 8.1.4.2:Clause 8.1.4.2 pertains to controlling external providers and ensuring their processes align with OH&S requirements, including documented agreements.

References

Clause 4.1: Understanding the organization and its context.

Clause 6.1.2.2: Assessment of risks and opportunities related to OH&S.

Clause 6.1.3: Compliance obligations.

Clause 8.1.4.2: Control of external providers.

A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated

Was he made aware of the hazards related to this work? → Clause 6.1.2.1:Clause 6.1.2.1 focuses on hazard identification. Organizations must identify hazards associated with work activities, such as operating a motorbike, and ensure workers are aware of these hazards.

Was he trained to use the new motorbike? → Clause 7.2:Clause 7.2 requires organizations to ensure that workers are competent to perform their assigned tasks, including providing necessary training for new equipment like a motorbike.

Was he asked to deliver too many orders in a short period of time? → Clause 8.2:Clause 8.2 relates to managing operational controls and ensuring that work processes do not impose undue risks, such as excessive workloads or time pressure.

Was he carrying any contact details in case of an accident? → Clause 7.3:Clause 7.3 requires effective communication of information relevant to OH&S, including emergency contact details or procedures for accidents.

ISO References:

Clause 6.1.2.1: Hazard identification.

Clause 7.2: Competence.

Clause 7.3: Awareness and communication.

Clause 8.2: Operational control.

Follow-up audits verify that corrective actions have been implemented effectively and address the root cause of the nonconformities.

Analysis of Options:

A. Review the latest emergency response drill report:Correct. This verifies whether emergency response processes are functional and effective.

B. Check if the internal audit schedule was revised:Incorrect. While beneficial, this is not directly related to closing out the nonconformity.

C. Check safety data sheets for completeness:Incorrect. While this ensures compliance, it is not directly related to verifying corrective actions.

D. Check if revised procedures were signed off:Correct. This confirms that changes were properly documented and approved.

E. Determine whether an updated risk assessment was carried out:Correct. Risk assessments confirm the effectiveness of new controls.

F. Inspect areas for safe chemical storage and handling:Correct. Direct observation ensures that corrective actions are implemented effectively.

G. Interview staff on revised emergency procedures:Incorrect. While important, this does not directly address the effectiveness of corrective actions for chemical storage.

H. Interview the OH&S Manager about additional objectives:Incorrect. This is unrelated to the specific nonconformities raised.

ISO References:

Clause 10.2.2: Verification of corrective actions.

Clause 8.1.2: Hazard identification and controls.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Clause 5.4 of ISO 45001:2018 emphasizes the importance of worker consultation and participation in the OHS management system. It requires organizations to establish processes that ensure workers are actively involved in decision-making and implementation of OHS practices.

Analysis of Options:

A. Promoting collaborating workers to higher positions:While promotions may boost morale, they do not directly contribute to worker consultation and participation in the OHSMS.

B. Appointing worker representatives:This action fosters direct communication and representation of workers' interests in health and safety matters.

C. Conducting toolbox talks on health and safety:Toolbox talks are an effective way to engage workers in discussing and addressing health and safety issues.

D. Giving ownership of health and safety matters:Involving workers in decision-making and giving them responsibility for specific health and safety tasks encourages participation.

E. Ignoring workers' suggestions:This undermines consultation and is contrary to ISO 45001 principles.

F. Implementing a payment scheme to reward workers' OHS performance:While incentives can motivate safe behavior, they are not a consultation or participation mechanism as required by Clause 5.4.

G. Implementing methods for engaging workers:This aligns directly with Clause 5.4, as effective engagement methods (e.g., surveys, focus groups) enhance participation.

H. Threatening reprisals to whistleblowers:This violates ISO 45001 principles and discourages worker participation.

ISO References:

Clause 5.4: Worker consultation and participation.

Clause 5.1: Leadership’s responsibility to foster participation.