Free Practice Questions for Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Exam

Nutanix platform timing guidelines state that Prism Central requires accurate clock synchronization to ensure proper authentication, event logging, certificate validation, and cluster orchestration. The documentation details that “NTP must be configured to a reachable, reliable time source, and best practice is to configure Prism Central to use an external, independent, standards-based NTP server.”

Using a Domain Controller is acceptable only if the DC itself is properly synchronized with an authoritative external NTP source, but Nutanix strongly recommends specifying the external source directly in Prism Central for consistency across hypervisors and multi-cluster environments. Adding a DNS server IP is not time-related. Adding a hostname is valid only if it resolves to a functioning NTP server, but the question requires the correct method, not the acceptable syntax.

Therefore, selecting an external NTP server is the correct and recommended configuration.

For NutanixDisaster Recovery (DR) protection policies, thefirst stepis to establish a connection between theProduction cluster and the DR site, which is done by creating anAvailability Zone (AZ) (Option B).

Availability Zones (AZs) define remote sites for replicationand are a requirement for configuring protection domains and disaster recovery plans.

Option A (Installing NGT)is not necessary for setting up replication but is useful for application-consistent snapshots.

Option C (Converting the source cluster to AHV)is not required, as Nutanix supports cross-hypervisor DR betweenESXi and AHV.

Option D (Creating a point-in-time snapshot)is a later step after setting up theAvailability Zone and Protection Policy.

For workloads requiring new IP addresses and DNS server settings during DR recovery, using custom scripting within the Recovery Plan is the recommended and supported method.

From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:

“Recovery Plans support scripting within the Recovery Sequence to enable administrators to perform post-recovery customization tasks, such as updating IP addresses, configuring DNS, or applying application-specific settings.”

“This scripting capability provides a flexible, automated approach to ensure that VMs are correctly reconfigured to operate within the DR environment’s network and DNS settings.”

This avoids the need for manual reconfiguration post-recovery or adjusting settings in production prior to failover.

Data-in-Transit Encryption ensures that replication traffic is encrypted while being sent over the internet.

Option D (Enable Data-in-Transit Encryption) is correct:

This encryptsreplicated data between clusters, ensuring security againstman-in-the-middle attacks.

Option A (Self-encrypting drive) is incorrect:

This protects data at rest, not during transmission.

Option B (UEFI Secure Boot) is incorrect:

Secure Boot prevents unauthorized OS modifications, but doesnot encrypt network traffic.

Option C (Data-at-Rest Encryption) is incorrect:

This encryptsstored data but does not secure replication traffic.

Capacity Runway analytics in Prism Central rely on historical usage data to generate forward-looking projections. Nutanix documentation specifies:

“Capacity runway forecasts require a minimum of 30 days of historical utilization data to build growth rate baselines and trending models.”

The modeling engine uses CPU, memory, and storage trends over time to estimate depletion dates. Insufficient historical data prevents generating meaningful predictions.

Prism Central will display “Not enough data” or simply omit runway metrics until the minimum time window is met.

The 21-day threshold applies to anomaly detection, not runway calculations.

The 3-month and 6-month options refer to optimal historical windows for accuracy but are not required.

Thus, the correct requirement is 30 days of history.

The Intelligent Operations and Analysis Dashboard in Prism Central supports generating ad-hoc reports. These reports are temporary artifacts and are not designed for long-term storage. Internal documentation states, “Generated reports are retained for 24 hours and then automatically purged by the system to prevent report accumulation and data bloat.” This automatic cleanup is part of the reporting subsystem and applies regardless of user role or storage location. The reports are not stored in Prism Element, nor are they archived automatically. Therefore, after the 24-hour retention window, the system removes them, explaining why the user could not find the previously generated report.

When creating a storage container in Nutanix, the administrator must configure the correctcapacity settings:

Option A (Prism Element with Advertised Capacity of 100 GiB) is correct:

Advertised Capacitydefineslogical limitsfor the container (i.e., how much space it reports as available).

Inline Compressioncan be enabled directly in Prism Element.

Option B (Create in Prism Element without Advertised Capacity)is incorrect:

Without specifyingAdvertised Capacity, the container may consume unlimited storage.

Option C (Create in Prism Central with Reserved Capacity)is incorrect:

Reserved Capacityapplies toQuality of Service (QoS) policies, not storage limits.

Option D (Create in Prism Central without capacity limits)is incorrect:

Prism Central can manage storage but does not directly enforceRF1 and compression policies.

The requirement states:

• Custom apps use Volume Groups

• VM + VG must remain consistent together

• Lowest possible RPO is required (RPO → 0)

• Must survive cluster failure

Nutanix data protection documentation clearly states:

“Synchronous replication provides an RPO of zero by ensuring every write is committed on both sites before acknowledgement.”

Additionally:

“When protecting application VMs using Volume Groups, both the VM and the Volume Group must be placed in the same Consistency Group to ensure write-order fidelity and to preserve database or application integrity during failover.”

This is critical because Volume Groups operate at the block layer, and placing them in separate groups breaks atomic write-order correctness.

Option analysis:

A. Metro AHV provides HA-style zero RPO but is not the required mechanism here because the question specifically references protection policies and VGs, which Metro does not orchestrate in the same way.

B. Synchronous replication alone is not sufficient unless VMs and VGs are inside the same consistency group.

C. This is the correct and complete solution: synchronous replication + consistency grouping ensures RPO0 and atomic updates.

D. NearSync has RPO 1–15 minutes, not the lowest possible RPO.

Therefore, placing both VMs and VGs in the same consistency group under Synchronous Replication is the correct method.

The test_esx_entering_mm_pinned_vms check in an AOS upgrade validates whether there are any pinned VMs on ESXi hosts, which could prevent host maintenance mode transitions.

From theNutanix Enterprise Cloud Administration (ECA)course materials:

“Affinity or anti-affinity rules that pin VMs to specific hosts prevent those VMs from migrating during host maintenance mode entry. This directly triggers a failure in the LCM precheck test_esx_entering_mm_pinned_vms check.”