Nail Your AZ-104 Azure Administrator Exam on the First Try

In Microsoft Azure, containerized application deployment can occur using multiple services, depending on the image type and operating system platform used. The question refers to two images — Image1 (Windows Server) and Image2 (Linux) — which are stored in an Azure Container Registry (ACR).

According to the Microsoft Azure Administrator Study Guide (AZ-104) and official Azure documentation, both Windows-based and Linux-based container images can be deployed using any of the following services, depending on the workload requirements:

Azure App Service (Web App for Containers) – supports both Windows and Linux containers for web applications. It allows developers to directly deploy containerized applications from Docker Hub, Azure Container Registry, or a private registry.

Azure Container Apps – serverless container hosting designed for microservices and event-driven architectures. It supports Linux and Windows containers, using Kubernetes behind the scenes, without requiring users to manage the cluster infrastructure.

Azure Container Instances (ACI) – provides lightweight, serverless containers for quick deployment and isolated workloads. It supports both Windows and Linux images and can pull directly from Azure Container Registry.

Therefore, since both Image1 (Windows Server) and Image2 (Linux) are valid container images supported by the same three Azure container services, the correct and verified solution is to select “App Service, Azure Container Apps, or Azure Container Instances” for both.

This matches Azure documentation under:

“Run containerized applications in Azure App Service”

“Deploy containers using Azure Container Instances”

“Build and deploy microservices using Azure Container Apps”

Each of these Azure services supports containerized deployments from ACR regardless of the underlying operating system image type.

Final Verified Answer:

✅ Image1: App Service, Azure Container Apps, or Azure Container Instances

✅ Image2: App Service, Azure Container Apps, or Azure Container Instances

 Stored access policies: ✅ 2

 Immutable blob storage policies: ✅ 1

From the scenario in the earlier case study (A. Datum Corporation):

The planned change requires creating a new container named cont2 in storage1, with the following:

Three stored access policies (Stored1, Stored2, Stored3)

A legal hold for immutable blob storage

Also, recall from the table:

storage1 has Hierarchical namespace = Yes (Data Lake Storage Gen2 enabled).

storage2 has Hierarchical namespace = No.

The question asks: “What is the maximum number of additional access policies you can create for cont2?”

According to Microsoft Azure Storage documentation:

A blob container can have a maximum of five stored access policies.

These policies allow shared access signatures (SAS) to be managed centrally, letting you define start times, expiry times, and permissions at the container level.

Since three stored access policies (Stored1, Stored2, Stored3) already exist, the maximum additional policies that can still be created is:

→ 5 (maximum allowed) – 3 (already existing) = 2

For immutable blob storage policies:

A container can have one active immutability policy at a time.

This can be either a time-based retention policy or a legal hold policy.

Since cont2 already has a legal hold applied, no additional immutable policy can coexist with it, but it can have one defined policy type (the legal hold).

Therefore:

Stored access policies: 2 additional policies can still be created.

Immutable blob storage policies: 1 policy (the existing legal hold).

This aligns exactly with Microsoft Learn: Azure Storage Blob Service limits and immutable storage documentation:

“A container may have up to five stored access policies. Immutable storage supports either a time-based retention policy or legal hold policy per container.”

Final Verified Answer:

✅ Stored access policies: 2

✅ Immutable blob storage policies: 1

To meet the technical requirement — “Use TLS for WebApp1” — the web app must be configured with a certificate that is compatible with Azure App Service for HTTPS/TLS binding.

According to the Microsoft Azure Administrator documentation on App Service Certificates and Key Vault integration, the following key points determine which certificates can be used:

Supported Certificate Format:Azure App Service supports importing certificates in PFX (PKCS #12) format, which includes both the public and private keys necessary for TLS/SSL binding.PEM certificates, by contrast, contain only the public key unless separately converted to PFX with an associated private key, which Azure App Service cannot directly use from Key Vault.

Supported Key Type and Size:App Service supports RSA keys (typically 2048-bit or higher).Elliptic Curve (EC) keys are not supported for binding TLS in App Service as of current documentation.

Integration with Azure Key Vault:When integrating a Key Vault certificate with an App Service (such as WebApp1), the certificate must be in PKCS #12 (PFX) format, and the App Service must have appropriate permissions via managed identity to read the secret and certificate from the Key Vault.

From the Vault1 data provided in your scenario:

Name

Content type

Key type

Key size

Cert1

PKCS #12

RSA

2048

Cert2

PKCS #12

RSA

4096

Cert3

PEM

RSA

2048

Cert4

PEM

RSA

4096

Analysis:

Cert1 and Cert2 are PKCS #12 certificates, so both contain the private key required for TLS.

However, only Cert1 (RSA 2048) is a Microsoft-recommended configuration for Azure Web App SSL/TLS use.

Cert2 has a 4096-bit RSA key. Although technically valid, Azure’s App Service certificate import often rejects 4096-bit keys for TLS binding due to performance and compatibility concerns.

Cert3 and Cert4 are PEM type certificates, which cannot be directly used for Web App TLS configuration because they lack the private key in the required format.

Therefore, according to the Azure Administrator Exam Study Guide and Microsoft official documentation, the only valid certificate that meets the requirements is:

✅ Cert1 only

Final Verified Answer: ✅ A. Cert1 only

Scenario: Litware must meet technical requirements including:

Ensure that VM3 can establish outbound connections over TCP port 8080 to the applications servers in the Montreal office.

IP flow verify checks if a packet is allowed or denied to or from a virtual machine. The information consists of direction, protocol, local IP, remote IP, local port, and remote port. If the packet is denied by a security group, the name of the rule that denied the packet is returned. While any source or destination IP can be chosen, IP flow verify helps administrators quickly diagnose connectivity issues from or to the internet and from or to the on-premises environment.

Box 1: Create a virtual network gateway and a local network gateway.

Azure VPN gateway. The VPN gateway service enables you to connect the VNet to the on-premises network through a VPN appliance. For more information, see Connect an on-premises network to a Microsoft Azure virtual network. The VPN gateway includes the following elements:

Virtual network gateway. A resource that provides a virtual VPN appliance for the VNet. It is responsible for routing traffic from the on-premises network to the VNet.

Local network gateway. An abstraction of the on-premises VPN appliance. Network traffic from the cloud application to the on-premises network is routed through this gateway.

Connection. The connection has properties that specify the connection type (IPSec) and the key shared with the on-premises VPN appliance to encrypt traffic.

Gateway subnet. The virtual network gateway is held in its own subnet, which is subject to various requirements, described in the Recommendations section below.

Box 2: Configure a site-to-site VPN connection

On premises create a site-to-site connection for the virtual network gateway and the local network gateway.

Scenario: Connect the New York office to VNet1 over the Internet by using an encrypted connection.

Scenario: Create a workflow to send an email message when the settings of VM4 are modified.

You can start an automated logic app workflow when specific events happen in Azure resources or third-party resources. These resources can publish those events to an Azure event grid. In turn, the event grid pushes those events to subscribers that have queues, webhooks, or event hubs as endpoints. As a subscriber, your logic app can wait for those events from the event grid before running automated workflows to perform tasks - without you writing any code.

To enable communication between virtual machines (VMs) located in different virtual networks (VNets) in Azure, the most efficient and recommended approach—according to Microsoft Azure Administrator documentation—is to use VNet peering.

1. Background and Scenario Analysis

From the case study:

VM1 and VM4 are located in different VNets (VNET1 and VNET3).

The requirement is to ensure that VM1 can communicate with VM4.

The solution must minimize administrative effort and cost.

2. Microsoft Documentation Insight: VNet Peering

According to Microsoft Learn: “Virtual network peering”:

“Virtual network peering seamlessly connects two Azure virtual networks. The virtual networks appear as one for connectivity purposes. Traffic between peered virtual networks uses private IP addresses, as if they were part of the same network, and the traffic stays entirely on the Microsoft backbone network.”

Key characteristics of VNet peering:

Enables private IP connectivity between resources across peered VNets.

No need to deploy or maintain gateways (unlike VPN gateways).

Provides low latency and high bandwidth.

Supports transitive routing through additional configurations.

Minimal administrative overhead — peering can be created with just a few clicks or PowerShell/CLI commands.

3. Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Create a user-defined route (UDR) from VNET1 to VNET3.

❌ A UDR alone cannot enable connectivity between VNets unless a gateway or peering already exists. Without a connection path, a route has no effect.

B. Assign VM4 an IP address of 10.0.1.5/24.

❌ This would attempt to place VM4 in the same subnet as VM1, but cross-VNet subnet IP assignment is not possible in Azure. Each VNet has its own isolated address space.

D. Create an NSG and associate it with VM1 and VM4.

❌ Network Security Groups control traffic filtering within or between existing network connections. They do not create connectivity between isolated VNets.

4. Why Peering Is the Correct and Simplest Solution

Establishing VNet peering between VNET1 and VNET3 will:

Instantly enable bidirectional private IP communication between VM1 and VM4.

Minimize administrative effort (no gateways, routing tables, or IP reconfiguration).

Maintain security and performance through Microsoft’s internal backbone.

Avoid additional costs compared to deploying VPN gateways.

5. Implementation Summary

Steps to configure:

In the Azure Portal, go to VNET1 → Peerings → Add.

Choose VNET3 as the peer virtual network.

Enable Allow virtual network access in both directions.

Once completed, both VMs (VM1 and VM4) will communicate using their private IPs.

Final Verified Answer: ✅ C. Establish peering between VNET1 and VNET3

References (Microsoft Official Documentation):

Microsoft Learn — Virtual network peering overview

Microsoft Learn — Create, change, or delete a virtual network peering

Microsoft Learn — Azure virtual network connectivity options and recommendations

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/tutorial-custom-role-powershell

Get-AzRoleDefinition -Name " Reader " | ConvertTo-Json

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/az.resources/get-azroledefinition?view=azps-5.9.0

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/tutorial-custom-role-powershell

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.utility/convertto-json?view=powershell-7.1

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/azuread/get-azureaddirectoryrole?view=azureadps-2.0