Free Practice Questions for IIA IIA-CIA-Part1 Exam

According to the IIA guidance on using the maturity model for assessing an organization's risk management program, a key activity to examine is "Monitor and Review." This element evaluates how well the organization continues to monitor its risk environment and reviews the effectiveness of risk management strategies over time. It is crucial for ensuring that risk management adapts to changes and continues to align with organizational objectives.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - Guidance on Risk Management Maturity Models

Strategic objectives are prerequisites to establishing internal controls. This is because internal controls are designed to ensure that the actions taken by an organization align with its strategic objectives, helping to manage risks that could impede the organization from achieving these goals.

COSO Framework and IIA guidance on internal controls.

The best reason why the engagement supervisor should take care in explaining to local management the criteria that will be used to measure the effectiveness of the control environment is that the assessment will cover soft controls and company values. Soft controls, such as ethical conduct and organizational culture, are less tangible and can be subject to different interpretations. Clearly defining and communicating the criteria for assessing these controls is crucial to ensure transparency and mutual understanding of the audit's focus and objectives.

IIA guidelines and best practices in evaluating the control environment, emphasizing the importance of clear communication about the scope and criteria of an audit, especially when it involves qualitative aspects like soft controls and organizational values.

Implementing fair work and pay practices and a policy to treat employees equitably and consistently will most likely reduce the pressure or incentive as a common characteristic of fraud. These measures can help diminish feelings of unfair treatment or dissatisfaction among employees, which are often drivers behind the rationalization for committing fraud.

Fraud Triangle and organizational behavior literature.

According to IIA guidance, the internal audit charter gives the internal audit activity the authority to request supporting documentation for the invoices of a third-party service provider. The charter typically outlines the scope, authority, and responsibilities of the internal audit activity, including access to records necessary to carry out its duties.

IIA Standards on the internal audit charter.

The true statement with regard to the quality assurance and improvement program (QAIP) is that the internal audit activity needs to assess whether each engagement on the annual internal audit plan is conducted in conformance with the Standards. This assessment is part of the ongoing monitoring of the internal audit activity’s performance, ensuring adherence to the IIA’s Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

The IIA’s International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, specifically those pertaining to quality assurance and improvement.

According to IIA guidance, the most effective training method in assisting new entry-level internal auditors in achieving competence with internal audit practices is involvement in a variety of audit assignments. Hands-on experience across different audits allows new auditors to apply theoretical knowledge practically, learn from real-world scenarios, and develop a deeper understanding of audit processes and challenges.

IIA standards and educational guidelines on auditor training and development, which advocate for practical experience as a key component of effective learning.

Reviewing training records for all internal auditors is a way to demonstrate an individual internal auditor's competency through continuing professional development. This method ensures that each auditor's training aligns with required competencies and standards, providing a clear record of professional development activities.

IIA standards on assessing professional competencies and continuing education.

This scenario violates The IIA's standards regarding internal audit independence because the chief risk officer's involvement in validating and dictating which audit findings are included in the audit committee reports undermines the independence of the internal audit activity. Independence is compromised when audit findings are subject to alteration or selection by another party within the organization, particularly one involved in managing risks that the audit may be assessing.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, specifically standards related to independence.

In this situation, the appropriate action for the internal auditor is to remain independent and avoid roles that could impair this independence, such as making managerial decisions. By advising and then directing the management to submit the proposal to senior management and the board, the auditor maintains an advisory role without crossing into decision-making territory, thus preserving the independence necessary for an assurance role.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

The most appropriate action for the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) to take in the scenario where staff might mistakenly believe the new internal auditor is related to the procurement manager is to discuss the matter with the appropriate personnel to alleviate concerns. This action ensures that concerns about independence and objectivity are addressed transparently, maintaining trust in the internal audit function.

The IIA’s Code of Ethics and standards on objectivity, which stress the importance of maintaining and demonstrating impartiality in all audit engagements.

The driver of fraud that is directly controllable by an organization is Opportunity. By designing and implementing strong internal controls, clearly defining roles and responsibilities, and conducting regular audits and reviews, an organization can significantly reduce the opportunities for fraud to occur within its environment.

Fraud Triangle theory and IIA guidance on fraud risk management.

Drafting operational procedures for an area and then auditing the same area is considered a threat to an internal auditor's objectivity because the auditor may be auditing their own work. This situation presents a self-review threat, where the auditor's independence can be compromised as they might be biased towards the procedures they themselves have created.

IIA Standard 1120 - Objectivity, which states that internal auditors should not audit their own work or provide assurance on activities for which they were previously responsible.

According to the Standards, internal audit professional development plans must ensure that staff development activities are based primarily on the skills and competencies needed to complete the audit plan. This requirement ensures that the internal audit staff possesses the necessary expertise and capabilities to effectively carry out the planned audit activities.

IIA Standards related to Continuing Professional Development and Staff Proficiency.

The correct statement regarding the role of the internal audit activity in the organization's risk management process is that the internal audit activity may coach management on risk response scenarios if appropriate safeguards have been implemented. This coaching role helps management understand and address risks effectively while maintaining the audit function's objectivity and independence.

The IIA's guidance on the role of internal auditing in risk management and the standards regarding objectivity and consulting.