Free Practice Questions for IIA IIA-CIA-Part1 Exam

To promote continuous improvement in control effectiveness, it is crucial that the internal audit activity evaluates whether management is effectively measuring and monitoring the costs and benefits of controls. This ensures that controls are not only designed appropriately but are also operating efficiently and providing the intended value to the organization. This proactive evaluation encourages continual refinement and adjustment of controls based on their effectiveness and efficiency.

IIA guidance on assessing and improving control effectiveness.

The most appropriate response for a chief audit executive (CAE) who has been asked to oversee the organization's insurance function is to report the request to the board and recommend alternate processes to obtain assurance related to insurance activities. Taking on operational responsibilities such as overseeing the insurance function could impair the objectivity and independence of the internal audit activity, making it difficult to audit those activities impartially in the future.

IIA Standards on independence and objectivity, particularly Standard 1130: Impairment to Independence or Objectivity.

===============

An effective governance process requires that risk is considered in strategic decision-making, ensuring that all significant risks are identified, assessed, and managed appropriately. This integration of risk management into the strategic planning process helps align risk appetite and strategy, improving the overall governance and risk management framework of the organization.

Senior management has the primary responsibility for resolving any fraud incidents found as a result of the investigation in the treasury department. While the internal audit activity may identify and report on fraud, and forensic accountants may assist in investigating it, the responsibility for addressing and resolving incidents of fraud, including implementing corrective actions and holding parties accountable, rests with senior management.

The IIA’s guidance on the roles and responsibilities in fraud investigations, which places ultimate responsibility for management of fraud risks with senior management.

The scenario described involves a self-review threat, which arises when auditors review work that they previously performed or were involved in. In this case, since the CAE had initially established and managed the risk management function before a chief risk officer took over, engaging an external resource to audit this function mitigates the threat to objectivity by ensuring an independent review. This action avoids potential bias and maintains the integrity of the audit process.

IIA guidance on objectivity and conflicts of interest.

Internal auditors obtain reasonable assurance that significant risks are identified and assessed primarily through comprehensive reviews of the organization’s strategic plan, business plan, and policies. Discussions with the board and senior management further enrich the auditors' understanding of the strategic directions and risk management processes, ensuring that all significant risks are identified and effectively addressed in alignment with organizational objectives.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

Facilitating a self-assessment of the organization's business risk and control identification is most likely to be classified as a consulting engagement. This type of activity involves helping the organization with advice and assistance to manage and improve its risk management, control, and governance processes, which aligns with the definition of consulting services provided by internal auditors.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

Internal assessments are part of an internal audit activity’s quality assurance and improvement program that requires ongoing monitoring to evaluate the internal audit activity's efficiency and effectiveness. These ongoing assessments help in continuously improving the performance and value of the internal audit function by ensuring that it operates effectively and adapts to changes in organizational needs and conditions.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

The appropriate role for the internal audit activity in relation to an organization's risk management process is to provide assurance on the effectiveness of these processes. This involves evaluating whether risk management practices help the organization manage its risks within defined risk tolerance levels effectively and are aligned with the strategic goals. Internal audit should not be involved in designing controls or setting risk tolerance as this could impair their independence.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

According to IIA guidance, the internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity's purpose, authority, and responsibility. It establishes the internal audit activity's position within the organization, including the nature of the chief audit executive’s functional reporting relationship with the board; authorizes access to records, personnel, and physical properties relevant to the performance of engagements; and defines the scope of internal audit activities. Final approval of the internal audit charter is done by the board, not just senior management. Furthermore, the charter might describe the expectations for communicating the results of the quality assurance and improvement program, which ensures that the internal audit activity continues to operate effectively and efficiently.

IIA Standard 1000: Purpose, Authority, and Responsibility; and Standard 1300: Quality Assurance and Improvement Program.

Conformance with The IIA's Code of Ethics is mandatory for internal auditors because it provides the basis for stakeholder trust and confidence in the validity of the profession of internal auditing and the internal audit activity's findings. Ethical behavior in internal auditing ensures that auditors are trusted by those who rely on their conclusions, advice, and information, thereby enhancing the integrity and credibility of the audit results.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

The level of competence of internal audit staff critically influences their proficiency in carrying out audit engagements. Competence encompasses the knowledge, skills, and other attributes necessary to perform audit tasks effectively. It affects the quality of the audits conducted and the value the audit team adds to the organization, ensuring that audits are performed with the required professional care and skepticism.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)

In the context of fraud risk management, organizations have the most influence over "Opportunity," which is one of the elements of the fraud triangle (Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization). Reducing opportunity can be achieved through internal controls, segregation of duties, and active oversight, which are directly manageable by the organization. By limiting the chances for fraud to occur, an organization can significantly mitigate its fraud risk.

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) guidance on fraud risk management.

To manage the impairment caused by an internal auditor's personal relationship affecting audit impartiality, a functional audit committee should be utilized. The audit committee is responsible for ensuring the independence and objectivity of the internal audit function. This committee can take actions such as reassigning the audit task, reviewing the affected audit work, or instituting additional oversight for audits in that area.

The IIA's Standards on objectivity and conflicts of interest (specifically standards relating to managing impairments to independence and objectivity).

In the scenario where an internal auditor assisted with management's design of controls over the procurement function, the chief audit executive should plan an assurance engagement on the adequacy of the internal control system by assigning the engagement to another internal auditor on staff. This approach ensures that the evaluation of the controls is conducted with objectivity and independence, as the auditor who helped design the controls may have an inherent bias.

IIA Standards regarding objectivity and independence in assurance engagements.