Free Practice Questions for ICF ICF-ACC Exam

Option C is the worst because it imposes the coach’s agenda ("not finished until..."), undermining client autonomy (Competency 8.3) and partnership (Competency 2.2). It violates Ethics Section 2.2 (avoiding bias) and contradicts the ICF Definition of Coaching, which prioritizes client-driven outcomes over rigid structures.

Option A (best, see Question 13) invites collaboration. Option B lacks depth but respects the client. Option D shifts focus prematurely. C most severely disrupts the coaching dynamic.

The ICF Code of Ethics (Section 3.1) defines a conflict of interest as a situation where a coach’s "personal interest appears to influence the objective exercise of their professional duties." Ownership creates a personal stake that could bias coaching. Let’s evaluate:

A. Providing coaching services to employees at a company the coach owns: This is a conflict, as the coach’s business interests may conflict with employee needs (Section 3.2 requires disclosure).

B. Providing coaching to part of an organization rather than coaching across the entire organization: This is a scope decision, not a conflict of interest.

C. Encouraging the interests of a department over the interests of the entire company: This may be unethical but isn’t a personal conflict of interest for the coach.

D. Putting a client’s interests ahead of the coach’s own business interests: This aligns with ethics, not a conflict (Section 1).

Option A is a conflict of interest, per ICF’s definition.

The ICF Code of Ethics (Section 4.1) requires coaches to "explain and ensure that, prior to or at the initial meeting, my coaching client(s) understand the nature and limits of confidentiality." Sharing with a supervisor must be disclosed in the coaching agreement (ICF Competency 3) to maintain transparency and trust. Let’s analyze:

A. Tell the client that the information needs to be shared with the supervisory coach so the coach can learn from the feedback: This is reactive and lacks prior consent, violating Section 4’s requirement for upfront clarity.

B. Add a statement to the client’s contract describing how information will be shared with the supervising coach: This proactively ensures client understanding and agreement, aligning with ICF ethics (Section 4.2) and Competency 3.

C. Correspond with the supervising coach verbally so there is no need to share the client’s information in writing: This avoids documentation but doesn’t address client consent or transparency, breaching ethical standards.

Option B is the best practice, per ICF’s confidentiality and agreement requirements.

ICF Competency 7 ("Evokes Awareness") involves "asking questions and providing observations that help the client gain insight and explore new perspectives." This competency prioritizes deepening the client’s self-understanding over offering solutions or validation. Let’s evaluate:

A. Ask what the client believes is at the root of this struggle: This powerful question evokes awareness by prompting self-reflection and insight, directly aligning with Competency 7 and the ICF focus on client autonomy (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 1).

B. Acknowledge that making friends is difficult and can take time: While supportive (Competency 5), this doesn’t challenge or deepen awareness, limiting its impact.

C. Suggest concrete steps the client could take to make friends: This shifts to action planning (Competency 8), not evoking awareness, and risks being directive (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 2.3).

D. Say the challenges are likely caused by cultural difference: This imposes the coach’s assumption, reducing client exploration and contradicting Competency 7’s focus on client-driven insight.

Option A best evokes awareness, per ICF’s competency framework.

The ICF defines coaching as a process focused on "partnering with clients in a thought-provoking and creative process that inspires them to maximize their personal and professional potential" (ICF Definition of Coaching). Coaching operates within specific boundaries, emphasizing future-oriented, goal-directed support rather than addressing mental health conditions or deep psychological issues, which fall under therapy (ICF Coaching Boundaries). Let’s analyze each option:

A. Inability to concentrate or complete tasks at work over several months: This suggests a persistent cognitive or emotional issue, potentially linked to conditions like ADHD or depression, which require therapeutic intervention beyond coaching’s scope (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 2.5: "I will refer clients to other professionals when appropriate").

B. Recurring thoughts of self-harm over the past two weeks: This is a serious mental health concern requiring immediate therapeutic or psychiatric support, not coaching (ICF Coaching Boundaries explicitly exclude mental health treatment).

C. Feelings of anxiety or panic surrounding work-related tasks: While coaching can address performance-related stress, ongoing anxiety or panic suggests a clinical issue better suited for therapy (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 2.5).

D. Struggling to get promoted despite working at a company for five years: This is a professional development challenge focused on goals, skills, or strategies—ideal for coaching. It aligns with ICF Competency 8 ("Facilitates Client Growth") by supporting the client in identifying barriers and creating action plans to achieve career aspirations.

Thus, option D is best addressed through coaching, as it fits within ICF’s ethical scope and competency framework for enhancing potential without crossing into therapeutic territory.

ICF Competency 3 ("Establishes and Maintains Agreements") requires a formal agreement before coaching begins, outlining roles, responsibilities, and logistics (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 1.1). This step follows mutual interest and precedes coaching. Let’s analyze:

A. Begin the coaching process: Starting without an agreement violates ICF ethics and competency standards.

B. Draft a coaching agreement: This is the next step, ensuring clarity and consent, especially with a third-party (company) involved (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 1.2).

C. Identify the company’s goals: This may inform the process but follows agreement drafting, which focuses on the client’s goals (Competency 3).

D. Develop an evaluation plan: This occurs later, after goals are set (Competency 8).

Option B is the correct next step, per ICF’s agreement requirements.

The ICF Code of Ethics (Section 3.1) defines a conflict of interest as "a situation in which a coach has a private or personal interest sufficient to appear to influence the objective exercise of their professional duties." Objectivity and impartiality are critical to maintaining trust and integrity in the coaching relationship (ICF Competency 2: "Embodies a Coaching Mindset"). Let’s evaluate the options:

A. Receiving payment from a client's employer for coaching the client because the employer may try to influence the coach: While this could raise concerns about influence, it’s not inherently a conflict unless the coach’s objectivity is compromised (e.g., prioritizing the employer’s agenda over the client’s). ICF allows third-party payment if disclosed and agreed upon (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 1.2).

B. Accepting professional recognition instead of payment because the recognition is greatly valued by the coach: This is a personal preference, not a conflict, as it doesn’t inherently affect the coach’s ability to serve the client objectively.

C. Providing individual coaching to a married couple because they may discuss each other’s sessions: This involves confidentiality risks (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 4), but it’s not a conflict of interest unless the coach has a personal stake in their relationship. ICF permits this if boundaries are clear and agreed upon.

D. Coaching a peer while competing with them for the same work because that may interfere with the coach’s objectivity: This is a clear conflict of interest. Competing with the client creates a personal interest (e.g., career advancement) that could bias the coach’s actions, undermining ICF’s requirement for impartiality (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 3.2: "I will disclose any conflict of interest").

Option D best reflects a conflict of interest, as it directly threatens the coach’s objectivity, a cornerstone of ICF ethics.

The ICF Code of Ethics (Section 2.5) requires coaches to "refer clients to other professionals when appropriate," such as when mental health concerns arise outside coaching’s scope (ICF Coaching Boundaries). If there’s no immediate danger, the coach continues within their role while suggesting support. The options provided seem misaligned, so I’ll interpret based on ICF standards:

A. Call emergency services as a precaution: This is unnecessary without immediate danger (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 4.3), overstepping the situation described.

B. Consult with a therapist to discuss the client’s behavior: This breaches confidentiality without client consent (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 4) and exceeds the coach’s role.

C. Share the concerns with the client’s closest family member: This also breaches confidentiality unless harm is imminent (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 4.3), making it incorrect here.

D. Recommend that the client end coaching to focus on their mental health: Ending coaching isn’t required; the coach can continue within scope while referring out (ICF Definition of Coaching).

The ICF Code of Ethics (Section 3.1) defines a conflict of interest as "a situation in which a coach has a private or personal interest sufficient to appear to influence the objective exercise of their professional duties." It’s about the coach’s competing interests, not the client’s. Let’s analyze:

A. The client has so many interests that it becomes a challenge to identify clear coaching goals: This is a coaching challenge, not a conflict of interest per ICF’s definition.

B. The coach and the client cannot agree on what will serve as the client’s best interest during the coi: (Assuming "coi" is "coaching") This is a disagreement, not a conflict of interest involving the coach’s personal gain.

C. The coach serves one of their own interests that works against one of the client’s interests: This matches Section 3.1, where a coach’s personal agenda (e.g., financial gain) undermines client needs, requiring disclosure (Section 3.2).

D. The interests expressed by the client have the potential to work against the coach’s plan for the session: This is a misalignment of goals, not a conflict of interest tied to the coach’s personal benefit.

Option C best reflects ICF’s definition of a conflict of interest.