Free Practice Questions for Google Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Exam

Use Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with cryptographic hashing:

Cloud DLP allows you to de-identify sensitive data using several techniques, including cryptographic hashing.

Choose a suitable hashing algorithm like SHA-256 for non-reversible anonymization.

This method converts the original data into a fixed-length hash that does not preserve the original data's format or character set.

Set up a Cloud DLP job to scan your data sources, identify PHI, and apply the cryptographic hashing transformation.

Implied IPv4 allow egress rule. An egress rule whose action is allow, destination is 0.0.0.0/0, and priority is the lowest possible (65535) lets any instance send traffic to any destination

Implied IPv4 deny ingress rule. An ingress rule whose action is deny, source is 0.0.0.0/0, and priority is the lowest possible (65535) protects all instances by blocking incoming connections to them.

https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/firewalls?hl=en#default_firewall_rules

Objective: Reduce the risk of Google Cloud user accounts being compromised.

Solution: Implement strong password policies and post-SSO 2-Step Verification using security keys.

Steps:

Step 1: In Active Directory, configure a domain password policy with strong settings (e.g., complexity, length, expiration).

Step 2: In the Google Admin console, navigate to the Security settings.

Step 3: Enable 2-Step Verification and configure it to use security keys for post-SSO verification.

Step 4: Ensure all users enroll in the 2-Step Verification with security keys.

Using strong password policies in Active Directory along with security keys for 2-Step Verification post-SSO provides enhanced security against account compromises.

This option directly addresses the needs of the business user who must access curated reports. By creating curated tables in a separate dataset, you can control access to specific data. Assigning the roles/bigquery.dataViewer role allows the business user to view the data in BigQuery.

To fulfill the requirements of preserving logs for 12 years and ensuring data residency within European boundaries, the best approach is to use Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) with a custom log bucket configured in the desired region.

Configure Cloud Logging Agent:

Install and configure the Cloud Logging agent on your Compute Engine instances. This agent collects logs from your application and system and sends them to Google Cloud's operations suite.

Create a Custom Log Bucket:

In the Cloud Logging interface, create a custom log bucket in the EUROPE-WEST1 region. This bucket will store your logs and can be configured with a custom retention period.

Set Custom Retention Policy:

Configure the retention policy for the custom log bucket to 12 years. This ensures that all logs are preserved for the required duration.

Ship Logs to the Custom Log Bucket:

Modify the logging configuration to direct logs from the Cloud Logging agent to the custom log bucket. This can be done through the logging configuration settings in the Cloud Console or by updating the agent configuration files.

This solution minimizes overhead by using managed services and ensures cost-effectiveness by leveraging Cloud Logging's built-in capabilities for log storage and retention management.

References

Cloud Logging Documentation

Creating and Managing Logs Buckets

The problem states that Google Cloud applications need to access external web services and requires the ability to monitor, control, and log this access.

Monitoring, Controlling, and Logging external web access: This specifically points to a proxy solution, which can intercept, inspect, and log HTTP/S traffic.

Secure Web Proxy (SWP): Google Cloud's Secure Web Proxy is designed for exactly this use case. It acts as an explicit forward proxy for HTTP(S) traffic, allowing organizations to implement granular access controls, inspect traffic for security threats, and log all outbound web requests from their Google Cloud environment.Extract Reference: "Secure Web Proxy is a managed service that lets you deploy and manage an explicit forward proxy to protect your organization's internal resources from web-based threats and to control access to external web applications." and "With Secure Web Proxy, you can: Enforce granular access policies based on different attributes, Log all HTTP(S) requests that are handled by the proxy, and Monitor web traffic for threats." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/secure-web-proxy)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Configure VPC firewall rules to allow the services to access the IP addresses of required external web services: VPC firewall rules operate at Layer 4 (TCP/UDP) and Layer 3 (IP). While they can allow or deny traffic to specific IP addresses and ports, they cannot monitor, control, or log HTTP/S requests at the application layer. They don't provide granular control over which web services are accessed or inspect the content of the requests.

C. Configure Google Cloud Armor to monitor and protect your applications by checking incoming traffic patterns for attack patterns: Google Cloud Armor is primarily a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection and Web Application Firewall (WAF) service. It focuses on protecting applications from incoming threats (ingress traffic), not controlling and logging outgoing access to external web services.

D. Set up a Cloud NAT instance to allow egress traffic from your VPC: Cloud NAT allows instances without external IP addresses to connect to the internet. While it enables egress, it does not provide monitoring, control, or logging capabilities for specific web services at the application layer. It's a network address translation service, not an application-layer proxy.

Therefore, setting up a Secure Web Proxy is the most appropriate solution to meet the requirements of monitoring, controlling, and logging access to external web services from Google Cloud applications.

To ensure compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) at the infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) level within Google Cloud, it's essential to have continuous monitoring and assessment tools that can detect deviations from compliance requirements.​

Option A: Creating data profiles and configuring Data Discovery jobs in Google Cloud Sensitive Data Protection focuses on identifying and analyzing sensitive data but does not directly address infrastructure compliance monitoring.​

Option B: Downloading the latest PCI DSS report from the Compliance Reports Manager provides a static compliance report but does not offer real-time detection of deviations within your specific environment.​

Option C: Utilizing Assured Workloads helps in creating environments that meet specific compliance requirements, but migrating existing projects into such folders does not actively detect deviations; it primarily ensures that new workloads comply with predefined policies.​

Option D: Activating Security Command Center (SCC) Premium and leveraging its Compliance Monitoring capabilities allows for continuous assessment of your Google Cloud environment against PCI DSS requirements. SCC can identify misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and compliance violations in real-time, providing actionable insights to address any issues promptly.​

Therefore, Option D is the most effective approach to detect deviations at the IaaS level in preparation for a PCI DSS audit.​

The problem describes an application with two Cloud Run services (Service A - frontend, Service B - backend) and requires setting up IAM with the principle of least privilege. Service A calls Service B.

Principle of Least Privilege: This principle dictates that each entity (in this case, a Cloud Run service) should only have the minimum permissions necessary to perform its function.

Separate Service Accounts for Separate Services: To adhere to the principle of least privilege, it's best practice to assign a unique service account to each distinct service or component. This ensures that a compromise of one service account does not grant excessive permissions across other services. Service A needs permissions to run itself and to invoke Service B. Service B only needs permissions to run itself.Extract Reference: "Assign a service account to a Cloud Run service. The service account acts as the identity for your service and determines what permissions your revisions have when executing requests. It is a best practice to grant each service account only the permissions that are required to run the specific service (principle of least privilege)." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/service-accounts)

Authentication for Cloud Run Services: When one Cloud Run service (caller) needs to invoke another Cloud Run service (callee), the caller must be authorized to do so. This is typically achieved by assigning the roles/run.invoker role on the callee service to the caller's service account.Extract Reference: "To allow a service to invoke another service, grant the roles/run.invoker role on the called service to the caller's service account." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/securing/service-to-service)

Let's evaluate the options:

A. Create a new service account with the permissions to run service A and service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the new service account to call the backend. This violates the principle of least privilege by giving a single service account permissions for both services. If that service account were compromised, both services would be affected.

B. Create two separate service accounts. Grant one service account the permissions to execute service A, and grant the other service account the permissions to execute service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the service account for service A to call the back-end. This aligns perfectly with least privilege. Service A gets its own identity, Service B gets its own identity. Service A's service account is then granted run.invoker permissions on Service B, allowing it to call the backend while Service B requires authentication. This is the recommended approach.

C. Use the Compute Engine default service account to run service A and service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the default service account to call the backend. The Compute Engine default service account often has broad permissions (e.g., editor role in its project). Using it violates the principle of least privilege and is generally discouraged for production applications due to the potential for excessive permissions.

D. Create three separate service accounts. Grant one service account the permissions to execute service A. Grant the second service account the permissions to run service B. Grant the third service account the permissions to communicate between both services A and B. Require authentication for service B. Call the back-end by authenticating with a service account key for the third service account. This introduces unnecessary complexity with a third service account just for communication. More critically, using a service account key for authentication is generally discouraged in Cloud Run environments where ADC (Application Default Credentials) can be used, as managing keys securely becomes an operational overhead and security risk. Cloud Run services automatically use their attached service accounts for authentication when making calls to other Google Cloud services, including other Cloud Run services.

Therefore, option B is the best solution, adhering to the principle of least privilege and Google Cloud best practices for Cloud Run service-to-service authentication.

Objective: Implement external web application protection and validate policy changes before enforcement.

Solution: Use Google Cloud Armor's preconfigured rules in preview mode.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the Google Cloud Armor section.

Step 3: Create or select a security policy.

Step 4: Apply preconfigured rules to the policy.

Step 5: Enable preview mode to simulate the effects of the rules without enforcing them.

Step 6: Monitor the logs to validate the policy changes.

Google Cloud Armor's preview mode allows you to test and validate the impact of security policies on your application traffic before applying them, ensuring that they work as intended without disrupting the service.