Free Practice Questions for Google Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Exam

When using Google Cloud's Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offerings like App Engine, Google manages the infrastructure, including the underlying OS, runtime, and scaling. However, securing the application code itself, such as defending against cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection (SQLi) attacks, remains the responsibility of the user. This involves implementing secure coding practices, validating inputs, and employing appropriate security measures within the application.

By default, Vertex AI uses a "Service Agent" (a Google-managed service account) which often has broad permissions across the project. To achieve isolation and least privilege, you must use Custom Service Accounts for each training job.

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Use a custom service account for Vertex AI):

"When you perform custom training, you can configure Vertex AI to use a custom service account. This allows you to grant the job only the specific permissions it needs (e.g., access to a specific Cloud Storage bucket) rather than using the default service agent which may have broader access. This is the recommended practice for multi-tenant or highly regulated environments."

Implementation Strategy:

Identity: Create a unique User-Managed Service Account (UMSA) for each specific training workload or team.

Permissions: Grant that UMSA the roles/storage.objectViewer (or Legacy Reader) only on the specific bucket containing the training data.

Job Config: When submitting the Vertex AI job, specify the serviceAccount field in the job request.

Why other options are incorrect:

A is incorrect: Using one custom service account for all jobs still doesn't provide isolation between the jobs themselves.

B and C are incorrect: These use the default service agent, which is shared across the project. If one job is compromised or misconfigured, it could potentially access data intended for other jobs because they share the same identity.

Cloud NAT (Network Address Translation) enables instances in a private network to connect to external services while not exposing their internal IP addresses to the public internet. This solution helps in situations where VMs need to initiate outbound connections without having a public IP address:

Cloud NAT Setup: Configure Cloud NAT for the subnet where your VMs are located. This allows these VMs to use the NAT gateway to communicate with external services securely.

Network Security: By using Cloud NAT, the internal IP addresses of VMs remain private, reducing the attack surface and enhancing security.

Operational Continuity: VMs can continue to communicate with external sites as needed for operations without requiring public IP addresses, meeting both security and functional requirements.

References

Cloud NAT Documentation

To restrict access to the MySQL instance to only the frontend application while other VMs are present in the subnets, creating an ingress firewall rule is the most appropriate approach. This rule will specifically allow traffic from subnet A (where the frontend application resides) to the MySQL instance in subnet B on port 3306, using network tags to target the specific MySQL VM.

Steps:

Create Network Tags: Apply a network tag (e.g., "data-tag") to the MySQL VM in subnet B.

Create Ingress Firewall Rule: Configure an ingress firewall rule with the following settings:

Source IP Range: Subnet A's IP range.

Target Tag: "data-tag".

Allowed Protocol/Ports: TCP:3306 (for MySQL).

This setup ensures that only instances in subnet A can communicate with the MySQL instance on port 3306.

The problem requires restricting admin access to Google Cloud APIs based on geographic location (Canada and Germany) and environment (development and production projects).

VPC Service Controls (VPC SC): VPC Service Controls is designed to create security perimeters around Google Cloud resources and services. Its primary purpose is to prevent data exfiltration and control access to Google Cloud APIs based on the context of the request, which includes the source IP address.

Extract Reference: "VPC Service Controls provides an extra layer of security defense for Google Cloud services that is independent of Identity and Access Management (IAM). While IAM enables granular identity-based access control, VPC Service Controls enables broader context-based perimeter security, including controlling data egress across the perimeter." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Overview of VPC Service Controls" - https://cloud.google.com/vpc-service-controls/docs/overview)

Service Perimeters for Environments: Creating dedicated perimeters for development and production projects allows for logical separation of environments, which aligns with the "dedicated projects for development and production" structure.

Ingress Policies with Geographic Restrictions: VPC Service Controls uses "ingress rules" to define who and from where requests can enter a service perimeter. These ingress rules can be configured to allow access based on various attributes, including the source IP address of the request. By allowing access from specific IP ranges corresponding to Canada and Germany, you effectively restrict administrative access to APIs from those countries. You can define "access levels" (which can include IP subnets or geographical origins) and attach them to ingress policies.

Extract Reference: "To allow ingress to resources, VPC Service Controls evaluates sources and identityType attributes as an AND condition... You must specify an accessLevel or a resource (Google Cloud project or VPC network), or set accessLevel attribute to *." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Ingress and egress rules | VPC Service Controls" - https://cloud.google.com/vpc-service-controls/docs/ingress-egress-rules)

Extract Reference (for Context-Aware Access which underpins access levels): "You can create different types of Context-Aware Access policies for accessing apps: IP, device, geographic origin, and custom access-level attributes." (Google Workspace Admin Help: "Protect your business with Context-Aware Access" - https://support.google.com/a/answer/9275380) - While this references Workspace apps, the underlying mechanism of Access Context Manager (used by VPC SC) supports geographic restrictions.

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Create dedicated firewall policies... restrict access based on geolocations: VPC firewall rules operate at the network level (Layers 3/4) within a VPC. They control traffic between VM instances or to/from the internet for network services. They do not directly control admin access to Google Cloud APIs (e.g., via the console or gcloud CLI calls) originating from outside the VPC.

B. Activate the organization policy on the folders to restrict resource location: The Resource Location Restriction organization policy constraint restricts where new resources can be created or stored (e.g., data residency requirements). It does not restrict where administrators can connect from to manage these resources or access APIs.

D. Create dedicated IAM Groups... Grant access: IAM (Identity and Access Management) controls who can access what resources and what actions they can perform. It does not natively provide control over where the access originates from (e.g., country-specific IP addresses).

Therefore, VPC Service Controls with properly configured ingress policies based on source IP/Access Levels is the recommended and most effective method for restricting admin access to Google Cloud APIs by geographic location and environment.

Challenge:

Prevent common misconfigurations that expose services (e.g., MYSQL) to the public internet.

Hierarchical Firewall Policies:

These policies can be applied at the organization level to enforce consistent network security rules across all projects.

Solution:

Create a hierarchical firewall policy that allows connections only from internal IP ranges.

This policy ensures that services like MySQL are not exposed to 0.0.0.0/0 (the entire internet).

Steps:

Step 1: Define the hierarchical firewall policy at the organization level.

Step 2: Set the rule to allow traffic only from internal IP ranges.

Step 3: Apply the policy to all projects under the organization.

Benefits:

Centralized management of network security.

Prevents accidental exposure of services to the public internet, enhancing security.

Objective: Ensure only front-end Compute Engine instances have public IPs, while others do not.

Solution: Use an organization policy to enforce this requirement.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the Organization Policies page.

Step 3: Create a new policy with the constraint constraints/compute.requireOsLogin (or similar constraint to manage public IPs).

Step 4: Define the conditions to allow public IPs only for the front-end instances.

Step 5: Apply the policy to the organization or specific projects as necessary.

By setting up an organization policy with specific conditions, you can control which instances are allowed to have public IPs based on their role or other attributes.

The key requirement is restricting access based on the client device (i.e., "corporate computers"). Context-Aware Access (CAA) is the specific Google Cloud tool designed to enforce access based on contextual factors, including the device security status or IP address.

Context Restriction: Context-Aware Access allows you to define an Access Level based on attributes like device policy compliance, operating system, or IP address range—this addresses the "corporate computers" requirement.

Isolation and Control: The Access Level is then enforced via an Organization Policy applied at the Project Level (or the folder/organization level), which fulfills the requirement to isolate access to Cloud Storage for this project and restrict the access to specific resources (Cloud Storage).

VPC Service Controls (VPC SC) (Option B) are great for isolating projects and preventing data exfiltration, but its primary access restriction mechanisms are based on IP range, not fine-grained device security posture and user identity together, making CAA the more precise tool for device-specific enforcement. Also, applying VPC SC ingress/egress based on IP addresses for end-user access can be complex and less flexible than CAA.

IAM (Option D) only controls who (identity) can access a resource, not where or how (context) they are accessing it from.

Extracts:

"Context-Aware Access (CAA) integrates with Google Workspace or Cloud Identity to enforce granular access to Google Cloud resources based on a user's context, such as their location, device security status, and IP address." (Source 7.1)

"To enforce CAA for Google Cloud resources like Cloud Storage, you create an Access Level that defines the required context (e.g., only corporate-managed devices) and apply it via an Organization Policy constraint (e.g., iam.allowedServices) at the project level." (Source 7.2)

"CAA allows you to restrict access based on the device security posture, a key requirement for enforcing 'corporate computer' access." (Source 7.3)

"The service evaluates all changes and remote access attempts to detect runtime attacks in near-real time." : https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/docs/concepts-container-threat-detection-overview This has nothing to do with KNOWN security Vulns in images