Free Practice Questions for Cyber AB CMMC-CCP Exam

TheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0is primarily based on two key National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publications:

NIST SP 800-171– " Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations "

NIST SP 800-172– " Enhanced Security Requirements for Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information: A Supplement to NIST Special Publication 800-171 "

Reference and Breakdown:

NIST SP 800-171

This document is thecore foundationof CMMC 2.0 and establishes the security requirements for protectingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)in non-federal systems.

The 110 security controls fromNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2are mapped directly toCMMC Level 2.

NIST SP 800-172

This supplement includesenhanced security requirementsfor organizations handlinghigh-value CUIthat faces advanced persistent threats (APTs).

These enhanced requirements apply toCMMC Level 3under the 2.0 model.

Eliminating Incorrect Answer Choices:

B. DFARS, FIPS 100, and NIST SP 800-171→Incorrect

WhileDFARS 252.204-7012mandates compliance withNIST SP 800-171,FIPS 100 does not existas a relevant cybersecurity standard.

C. DFARS, NIST, and Carnegie Mellon University→Incorrect

CMMC is aligned with DFARS and NIST but isnot developed or directly influenced by Carnegie Mellon University.

D. DFARS, FIPS 100, NIST SP 800-171, and Carnegie Mellon University→Incorrect

Again,FIPS 100 is not relevant, andCarnegie Mellon Universityis not a defining entity in the CMMC framework.

Official CMMC 2.0 References Supporting the Answer:

CMMC 2.0 Scoping Guide (2023)confirms thatCMMC Level 2 is entirely based on NIST SP 800-171.

CMMC 2.0 Level 3 Draft Documentationexplicitly referencesNIST SP 800-172for enhanced security requirements.

DoD Interim Rule (DFARS 252.204-7021)mandates that organizations meetNIST SP 800-171 for CUI protection.

Final Conclusion:

The CMMC 2.0 model is derivedsolely from NIST SP 800-171 and NIST SP 800-172, makingAnswer A the only correct choice.

Step 1: Responsibility for Subcontractor Compliance

The prime contractor (contractor organization)is responsible for ensuring thatits subcontractorshave the requiredCMMC certification levelbefore engaging them inDoD contracts that involve FCI or CUI.

This requirement is enforced throughflow-down clausesinDFARS 252.204-7021, which mandates that subcontractors handlingCUImeet the necessaryCMMC Level 2 or Level 3 requirements.

In CMMC scoping terminology, an HQ Organization is the entity legally responsible for contract performance and delivery of products or services.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CMMC Scoping Guide: “HQ Organization is the legal entity responsible for the performance and delivery of contract requirements.”

Why Option D is Correct:

The HQ Org is legally accountable, while Host Units (option A/B) are subordinate entities.

Option C refers to shared services, not the HQ.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Scoping Guide, High-Level Scoping Definitions.

===========

Understanding SC.L2-3.13.14 – Control and Monitor the Use of VoIP Technologies

TheCMMC 2.0 Level 2requirementSC.L2-3.13.14comes fromNIST SP 800-171, Security Requirement 3.13.14, which mandates that organizations mustcontrol and monitor the use of VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) technologiesif used within their system boundary.

If a systemdoes not use VoIP technology, then this control isNot Applicable (N/A)because there is nothing to assess.

Why Option D is Correct

When a requirement is marked as Not Applicable (N/A), it means the OSC does not use the technology or process covered by that controlwithin its assessment boundary.

No assessment procedures are neededsince there is no VoIP system to evaluate.

Option A (Existing telephone system in scope)is incorrect becausetraditional (non-VoIP) telephone systems are not covered by SC.L2-3.13.14—only VoIP is within scope.

Option B (Error, contact the Lead Assessor)is incorrect because markingSC.L2-3.13.14 as N/A is valid if VoIP is not used. This is not an error.

Option C (VoIP in scope but using FIPS-validated encryption, so it doesn’t need to be assessed)is incorrect becauseeven if VoIP uses FIPS-validated encryption, the control would still need to be assessed to ensure monitoring and usage control are in place.

Official CMMC Documentation References

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Assessment Guide – SC.L2-3.13.14

NIST SP 800-171, Security Requirement 3.13.14

CMMC Scoping Guidance – Determining Not Applicable (N/A) Practices

Final Verification

IfVoIP is not used within the OSC’s system boundary, the control does not require assessment, making Option D the correct answer.

In the context of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0, particularly at Level 2, organizations are required to implement stringent controls to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). This includes adhering to specific practices related to media protection and physical security.

Media Protection (MP):

MP.L2-3.8.1 – Media Protection: Organizations must protect (i.e., physically control and securely store) system media containing CUI, both paper and digital. This ensures that sensitive information is not accessible to unauthorized individuals.

Defense Innovation Unit

MP.L2-3.8.3 – Media Disposal: It is imperative to sanitize or destroy information system media containing CUI before disposal or release for reuse. This practice prevents potential data breaches from discarded or repurposed media.

Defense Innovation Unit

Physical Protection (PE):

PE.L2-3.10.2 – Monitor Facility: Organizations are required to protect and monitor the physical facility and support infrastructure for organizational systems. This includes ensuring that areas where CUI is processed or stored are secure and access is controlled.

Defense Innovation Unit

Application to the Scenario:

Given that the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) operates within a shared, multi-tenant building and utilizes a common conference room for assessments, the following considerations are crucial:

Reviewing the Evidence File: The evidence file, which contains CUI, should be reviewed on a secure, authorized device to prevent unauthorized access or potential data leakage.

Printing the Evidence File: If printing is necessary, ensure that the printer is located in a secure area, and the printed documents are retrieved immediately to prevent unauthorized viewing.

Making Notes: Any notes derived from the evidence file should be treated with the same level of security as the original document, especially if they contain CUI.

Disposal of Printed Materials: After the assessment, all printed materials and notes containing CUI must be destroyed using a cross-cut shredder. Cross-cut shredding ensures that the information cannot be reconstructed, thereby maintaining confidentiality.

totem.tech

Options A and D are inadequate as they involve leaving sensitive information in unsecured locations, which violates CMMC physical security requirements. Option B, while secure in terms of digital handling, does not address the proper disposal of any physical copies that may have been made. Therefore, Option C is the best practice, aligning with CMMC 2.0 guidelines by ensuring that all physical media containing CUI are properly reviewed, securely stored during use, and thoroughly destroyed when no longer needed.

Understanding Multi-Function Device (MFD) Security in CMMC

Multi-function devices (MFDs), such asscanners, printers, and copiers,process, store, and transmit FCI, making them apotential attack surfacefor unauthorized access.

Thebest technical controlto limit MFD access to only authorized systems isVirtual LAN (VLAN) restrictions, whichsegment and isolate network traffic.

Why the Correct Answer is " A. Virtual LAN (VLAN) Restrictions " ?

VLAN Restrictions Provide Network Segmentation

VLANsisolate the MFDfrom unauthorized systems, ensuringonly approved devicescan communicate with it.

Prevents unauthorized network access bylimiting connectionsto specific IPs or subnets.

Meets CMMC 2.0 Network Security Controls

Aligns withCMMC System and Communications Protection (SC) Practicesfor network segmentation and access control.

Reducesthe risk of unauthorized access to scanned and printed FCI.

Why Not the Other Options?

B. Single administrative account→Incorrect

Asingle admin accountdoes not restrict accessbetween devices, only controlswho can configurethe MFD.

C. Documentation showing MFD configuration→Incorrect

Documentation helps with compliance butdoes not actively restrict access.

D. Access lists only known to the IT administrator→Incorrect

Access lists should besystem-enforced, not just " known " to the administrator.

Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:

CMMC Practice SC.3.192 (Network Segmentation)– Requires restricting access usingnetwork segmentation techniques such as VLANs.

NIST SP 800-171 (SC Family)– Supportsisolation of sensitive devicesusing VLANs and other segmentation controls.

Final Justification:

SinceVirtual LAN (VLAN) restrictions enforce access control at the network level, the correct answer isA. Virtual LAN (VLAN) restrictions.

In the CMMC 2.0 Model , the " Advanced Level " specifically refers to Level 2 . The CMMC model is designed to be cumulative , meaning each level builds upon the requirements of the levels beneath it.

Cumulative Framework : To achieve a certification at a specific level, an Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) must demonstrate compliance with all practices at that level and all practices from the lower levels.

Access Control (AC) Domain : The Access Control domain is one of the 14 domains in CMMC Level 2. It consists of a total of 22 practices :

Level 1 (Foundational) : Contains 4 basic safeguarding practices (mapped to FAR 52.204-21).

Level 2 (Advanced) : Adds 18 additional practices (mapped to NIST SP 800-171), totaling 22 practices for the AC domain at this level.

Defining " Advanced " : The DoD defines the levels as Level 1 (Foundational), Level 2 (Advanced), and Level 3 (Expert). Therefore, the " Advanced Level " (Level 2) contains the practices from Level 1 and Level 2, but does not include the " Expert " (Level 3) practices, which are derived from NIST SP 800-172.

Why other options are incorrect :

Option A : While it contains Level 1 practices, it also includes Level 2 practices.

Option B : Level 3 is the " Expert " level, which is separate and higher than the " Advanced " level.

Option D : The Advanced level does not reach the requirements of Level 3.

Reference Documents :

CMMC Model Overview (v2.0) : Section 3.2, " Level 2: Advanced, " which describes the 110 practices derived from NIST SP 800-171.

32 CFR Part 170 (CMMC Program Rule) : Details the structure of the levels and the requirement for cumulative compliance.

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide : Lists all 22 Access Control practices required for a Level 2 assessment, clearly identifying which are carried over from Level 1.

===========

During aCMMC assessment, organizations must provide evidence to demonstrate compliance with requiredpractices and processes. Assessors evaluate this evidence based on two key criteria:

Adequacy– Does the evidence meet the intent of the security requirement?

Sufficiency– Is there enough evidence to reasonably conclude that the practice/process is effectively implemented?

These principles are outlined in theCMMC Assessment Process Guide, which provides a structured approach for evaluating compliance.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

✅1. Adequacy – Does the evidence fully meet the requirement?

Adequacyrefers to whether the evidence properly demonstrates that the security practice has been implemented as required.

Example: If an organization claims to enforceMulti-Factor Authentication (MFA), an assessor would checksystem configurations, login policies, and user authentication logsto confirm that MFA is actually in use.

✅2. Sufficiency – Is there enough evidence to support the claim?

Sufficiencymeans that there isenough supporting evidenceto prove compliance.

Example: If an organization providesonly one screenshot of an MFA login screen, that alone may not besufficient—additional logs, policies, and user records would help strengthen the case.

Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(B) Adequacy and Thoroughness❌

Thoroughnessis not a defined metric in CMMC evidence evaluation.

The focus is onwhether the evidence meets the requirement (adequacy)and if there isenough of it (sufficiency).

(C) Sufficiency and Thoroughness❌

Thoroughnessis not a recognized term in CMMC compliance validation.

Evidence must beadequate and sufficient, not just thorough.

(D) Sufficiency and Appropriateness❌

Appropriatenessis not a CMMC-defined criterion.

Thecorrect terms used in CMMC assessmentsareAdequacy(Does it meet the requirement?) andSufficiency(Is there enough proof?).

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

CMMC Assessment Process Guideexplicitly states that evidence must be evaluated based onadequacyandsufficiencyto confirm compliance with security practices.

The correct answer is C . Under the official CMMC Assessment Process, the C3PAO is responsible for submitting CMMC Level 2 certification assessment results into CMMC eMASS , which is the Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service environment used for CMMC assessment result submission. The CMMC Assessment Process Version 2.0 states that CMMC Level 2 certification assessment results are uploaded to CMMC eMASS by the C3PAO, and that the user workspace used for upload must exist within the scope of the C3PAO’s DIBCAC-assessed environment.

This means the OSC does not submit the final certification assessment package directly, and the Lead Assessor does not independently submit final results to the CMMC-AB. The Lead Assessor leads assessment execution, prepares findings, supports the out-brief, and works with the assessment team, but the formal assessment-result submission function belongs to the authorized C3PAO. The CMMC Quality Assurance Professional review occurs before final submission to help ensure assessment completeness, consistency, and quality. After that review, the C3PAO submits the assessment results into the official CMMC eMASS environment. Therefore, options A , B , and D are incorrect because they identify the wrong receiving entity or the wrong submitting party. Option C correctly identifies both the submitting organization and the official submission system.

===========