Free Practice Questions for CompTIA SY0-701 Exam

Since the logs on the endpoint were deleted, the next best option for the analyst is to examine firewall logs. Firewall logs can reveal external communication, including outbound traffic to a command-and-control (C2) server. These logs would contain information about the IP addresses, ports, and protocols used, which can help in identifying suspicious connections.

IPS logs may provide information about network intrusions, but firewall logs are better for tracking communication patterns.

ACL logs (Access Control List) are useful for tracking access permissions but not for identifying C2 communication.

Windows security logs would have been ideal if they had not been deleted

Monitoring outbound traffic is essential for detecting unauthorized data exfiltration from a system. A new vulnerability that allows malware to move data unauthorizedly would typically attempt to send this data out of the network. By monitoring outbound traffic, security tools can detect unusual data transfers, trigger alerts, and help prevent the exfiltration of sensitive information.

References =

CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Course Content: Domain 04 Security Operations​.

CompTIA Security+ SY0-601 Study Guide: Chapter on Threat Detection and Response​.

Multifactor authentication (MFA) requires users to provide two or more of the following categories:

Something you know (password/PIN)

Something you have (token/smart card)

Something you are (biometrics)

Authentication tokens (A) qualify as something you have, such as hardware tokens, OTP apps, or smart cards.

Biometrics (C) qualify as something you are, such as fingerprint scans, facial recognition, or iris scans. Using these two together easily establishes MFA.

Least privilege (B) is an authorization principle, not an MFA factor. LDAP (D) is a directory service protocol, not an MFA mechanism. Password vaulting (E) assists with credential storage but does not implement MFA. SAML (F) is a federation protocol used for Single Sign-On (SSO), not inherently MFA.

Thus, the correct MFA components are A: Authentication tokens and C: Biometrics.

The best answer is B. Updating default credentials and applying network segmentation.

IoT devices often present increased security risk because they may have weak default settings, limited security features, and persistent network connectivity. Two of the most effective ways to reduce this risk are:

Updating default credentialsMany IoT devices come with default usernames and passwords that are widely known or easy to guess. Leaving default credentials unchanged creates a major security weakness.

Applying network segmentationSegmenting IoT devices onto a separate network or VLAN limits their ability to interact with critical corporate systems. If one device is compromised, segmentation helps contain the threat and reduces lateral movement.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Assigning static IP addresses to the devicesStatic IP addresses may help with management and inventory, but they do not significantly reduce the core security risk.

C. Connecting the devices to the guest Wi-Fi to prevent interactions with corporate ITThis may seem helpful, but guest Wi-Fi is typically designed for temporary user access, not secured management of business IoT systems. It is not the best practice compared with a properly segmented and controlled IoT network.

D. Allowing the vendor to have remote access for day-to-day managementRoutine vendor remote access can increase risk if not tightly controlled. Third-party access should be limited, monitored, and secured, not broadly allowed as a default control.

From the SY0-701 perspective, IoT security commonly emphasizes changing insecure defaults, restricting access, segmentation, and reducing exposure. Therefore, B is the strongest and most complete answer.

The best answer is C. Apply aggregation.

In Security+ logging and monitoring concepts, log aggregation means collecting logs from multiple systems and centralizing them in one place, often for use by a SIEM or another monitoring platform. This improves the speed and efficiency of searches because analysts do not need to query many separate devices or locations individually. Centralized logs are much easier to index, correlate, and search quickly.

Why the other options are not the best choice:

A. Conduct deduplicationDeduplication reduces repeated data and may save storage space, but it is primarily a storage-efficiency method. It does not directly provide the best improvement for fast searching across logs.

B. Conduct archivingArchiving is used for long-term retention, but archived logs are usually moved out of readily searchable live storage. This would not support the requirement for the shortest search time frame.

D. Apply compressionCompression saves storage capacity, but compressed logs may require decompression or additional processing before review. This does not best support the need for the fastest searches.

From a Security+ perspective, when the goal is rapid log review, correlation, and search performance, aggregation is the strongest answer because it supports centralized monitoring and efficient analysis of live logs over the retention period.

Shadow IT refers to software, hardware, cloud services, or applications deployed without approval from the IT or security department. In this scenario, a high school department is using an unvetted simulation program—classic Shadow IT behavior.

Security+ SY0-701 explains that Shadow IT:

Introduces unknown vulnerabilities

Bypasses security controls

Creates compliance risks

Leads to data exposure

Interferes with standard configuration management

Espionage (A) involves intelligence gathering, not unauthorized software use. Data exfiltration (B) involves data theft, not unauthorized software deployment. Zero-day (D) refers to unknown vulnerabilities, not unapproved systems.

Thus, Shadow IT is the correct answer.

The best answer is A. Peer review requirements.

The question asks about information security policies related to the software development methodology. At the policy and governance level, a CISO is most likely to document broad secure development requirements that apply across the organization. Peer review requirements fit this well because they establish a formal development control to help ensure code quality, reduce security flaws, and support secure software development practices.

Peer review is a common secure development requirement because it helps detect:

coding errors

insecure logic

poor implementation of security controls

accidental exposure of sensitive functionality

Why the other options are less appropriate:

B. Multifactor authenticationMFA is a security control, but it is not specifically tied to documenting the software development methodology itself.

C. Branch protection testsBranch protection is more of a technical repository or version control configuration detail than a high-level policy requirement.

D. Secrets management configurationsSecrets management is important, but configurations are typically procedural or technical implementation details rather than the most likely policy language a CISO would include in methodology documentation.

From a Security+ perspective, governance documents usually define secure coding expectations, review processes, and oversight requirements, making peer review requirements the best answer.

Detailed Explanation:

Time-of-day restrictions limit access to corporate systems based on predefined schedules. This ensures employees can only access resources during their assigned work hours. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 3: Security Architecture, Section: " Access Control Models " ​​.

Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) is a security protocol used to encrypt and authenticate the streaming of audio and video over IP networks. It ensures that the video streams from the IP cameras are both encrypted to prevent unauthorized access and authenticated to verify the integrity of the stream, making it the ideal choice for securing video surveillance.

Impersonation occurs when an attacker or unauthorized user is granted access (authorized) by masquerading as a legitimate user, effectively bypassing or exploiting the authentication process. This means authorization is mistakenly granted before proper authentication.

Privilege escalation (A) involves gaining higher access after authentication. Race conditions (B) are timing vulnerabilities. Tailgating (C) refers to physical unauthorized access by following an authorized person.

Impersonation is a well-known identity attack vector detailed in the Threats and Vulnerabilities domain of SY0-701【6:Chapter 4†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities allow attackers to inject malicious scripts into a website, which are then executed in the user’s web browser, potentially leading to data theft or session hijacking.References: Security+ SY0-701 Course Content​, Security+ SY0-601 Book​.

LDAP authentication on the printer (C)would require users toauthenticate before printing, enablingsecure print release. This ensures that documents arenot printed until the authorized user is physically present, which directly addresses the issue of missing confidential documents.

As perCompTIA Security+ SY0-701, Domain 3.1 (Access management), integratingauthentication mechanisms like LDAPimproves physical and document security in shared environments.

 A user provisioning script is an automation technique that uses a predefined set of instructions or commands to create, modify, or delete user accounts and assign appropriate access or permissions. A user provisioning script can help to streamline account creation by reducing manual errors, ensuring consistency and compliance, and saving time and resources12.

The other options are not automation techniques that can streamline account creation:

Guard rail script: This is a script that monitors and enforces the security policies and rules on a system or a network. A guard rail script can help to prevent unauthorized or malicious actions, such as changing security settings, accessing restricted resources, or installing unwanted software3.

Ticketing workflow: This is a process that tracks and manages the requests, issues, or incidents that are reported by users or customers. A ticketing workflow can help to improve the communication, collaboration, and resolution of problems, but it does not automate the account creation process4.

Escalation script: This is a script that triggers an alert or a notification when a certain condition or threshold is met or exceeded. An escalation script can help to inform the relevant parties or authorities of a critical situation, such as a security breach, a performance degradation, or a service outage.

References = 1: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 1022: User Provisioning – CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 – 5.1, video by Professor Messer3: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 1034: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 104. : CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 105.

When conducting a forensic analysis after an incident, it ' s essential to prioritize the data collection process based on the " order of volatility. " This principle dictates that more volatile data (e.g., data in memory, network connections) should be captured before less volatile data (e.g., disk drives, logs). The idea is to preserve the most transient and potentially valuable evidence first, as it is more likely to be lost or altered quickly.

References =

CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Course Content: Domain 04 Security Operations​.

CompTIA Security+ SY0-601 Study Guide: Chapter on Digital Forensics​.

Tokenization is widely used in the financial industry to mask sensitive information such as credit card numbers, bank account details, or payment tokens. Tokenization replaces sensitive data with harmless surrogate values (tokens) that maintain format and usability but reveal nothing if intercepted.

Security+ SY0-701 highlights tokenization as a preferred method for PCI-DSS-regulated environments because:

It reduces exposure of actual sensitive data

It lowers compliance scope

Tokens can be mapped back to real data only through a secure token vault

It prevents attackers from accessing meaningful information

Hashing (B) is one-way and cannot be reversed, making it unsuitable for financial transactions that require retrieving original values. Salting (C) enhances password hashing security but does not mask data. Steganography (D) hides data inside images or media files, not used for structured data protection.

Thus, the correct answer is A: Tokenization.