Free Practice Questions for APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam

The two statements that explain why the Architecture Angels' Finance Director would be an appropriate Business Sponsor are:

C. Is the project budget holder. D. Is concerned about preventing the costs of refurbishment from escalating and affecting the operations of the company.

Rationale:

•C: Being the project budget holder, the Finance Director has a clear overview of the financial aspects of the project, which is crucial for the role of Business Sponsor. They are responsible for the financial governance of the project, ensuring that the project remains viable and delivers value for money.

•D: A key responsibility of a Business Sponsor is to safeguard the project from going over budget. The Finance Director's concern for preventing cost escalation is aligned with this responsibility, as they would work to balance the financial constraints with the project objectives.

Options A, B, and E do not directly relate to the role's responsibilities and do not support why the Finance Director would be suitable for the Business Sponsor role in an Agile context.

The two statements that explain why the Architecture Angels’ Marketing Director would be an appropriate Business Visionary are:

•B. Is fully committed to changing the company’s strategic direction to include hotel renovation. This shows that the Marketing Director is aligned with the project’s goals and is invested in its success.

•E. Has a passion for old buildings and can see the potential for business opportunity. This passion and vision are key characteristics of a Business Visionary, who is responsible for guiding the project towards delivering value for the business.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

The SCARF framework emphasizes the importance of fairness, defined as treating people equitably and ensuring transparency in processes and decisions. In this scenario, staff are concerned that managers are receiving preferential treatment, undermining the sense of fairness during the relocation.

1. Why Fairness is Key in the SCARF Framework

Fairness is a critical driver of motivation, fostering trust and reducing resistance to change.

Perceived inequality or favoritism, such as managers receiving "special treatment," creates resentment and disengagement.

To maintain fairness, the relocation plan should ensure equality and avoid actions that reinforce perceived hierarchies or favoritism.

2. Why Option B is Correct

Fairness should be based on establishing equality across all staff.

Addressing concerns about special treatment requires ensuring that all staff, including managers, are treated equitably in desk allocations.

Communicating independently with groups or implementing staggered moves does not address the core issue of perceived inequality.

3. Analysis of Other Options

Option A: No, because ‘fairness’ relies on providing appropriate access to all relevant change information.

While transparency is important, fairness is primarily about ensuring equality. Merely providing information does not resolve the perception of inequality in desk allocations.

Eliminate.

Option C: Yes, because small change steps will focus staff on changes that relate only to them.

Focusing on smaller steps or individual groups might improve clarity and reduce resistance, but it does not directly address concerns about fairness. The root issue—perceived favoritism—remains unaddressed.

Eliminate.

Option D: Yes, because frequent communications will help discourage emotional responses.

Communication is valuable in managing change, but fairness depends on equitable treatment, not just communication. If staff perceive inequality, frequent communication alone will not resolve their concerns.

Eliminate.

4. Practical Implications

To address fairness concerns, the relocation team should take visible steps to ensure that desk allocations are equitable for all employees, including managers.

A transparent decision-making process, involving staff input, can further enhance perceptions of fairness.

5. Reference to SCARF Framework

Fairness: Fairness is about ensuring everyone is treated equitably and that decisions are perceived as just and transparent. Failure to address perceived inequalities can lead to disengagement and demotivation.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

This question refers to Gagné's Nine Events of Instruction, a model for designing effective learning activities. One of the steps in this model is to activate learners' prior knowledge, which serves as a foundation for new learning. Here's why C is the best answer:

1. Activating Prior Knowledge in Gagné’s Model:

In Gagné’s Nine Events of Instruction, reminding learners of related knowledge or skills is part of the event “Stimulating recall of prior learning.”

This step is crucial as it helps learners connect what they already know to the new content, making the learning process smoother and more meaningful.

2. Why Option C is Correct:

Reminding learners of related knowledge or skills increases their understanding of what the new learning will enable them to do by providing context and relevance.

It helps bridge the gap between existing knowledge and new concepts, allowing learners to see the practical value and application of the new material.

3. Analysis of Other Options:

Option A: Enables learners to understand how they learn.

While activating prior knowledge might give some insight into learning processes, this is not the primary reason for reminding learners of what they already know.

Option B: Helps learners plan to use immediately what they learn.

Planning for immediate application is a valid outcome of effective learning but not the primary reason for recalling prior knowledge.

Option D: Reduces learners’ concerns about new learning.

While recalling prior knowledge may ease anxiety, this is not the main purpose in Gagné’s model. The focus is on understanding and connecting prior knowledge to new concepts.

4. Practical Example:

If a learner is being introduced to a new software tool, reminding them of their previous experience with similar tools helps them relate to the new content and understand how the new tool will expand their capabilities.

5. Reference to Gagné’s Model:

Event 3: Stimulate Recall of Prior Learning

This step facilitates the integration of prior knowledge with new material, which enhances comprehension and retention.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

This question uses the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) framework. The described behavior reflects a Feeling preference, as the Customer Services Manager is focused on the emotional well-being of their team and is acting out of concern for others' experiences.

1. Why the Answer is Feeling (D):

People with the Feeling preference prioritize values, empathy, and the impact of decisions on others.

The Customer Services Manager is actively addressing staff wellness by:

Offering direct support to those who are overwhelmed.

Focusing on creating a safe and supportive environment.

This focus on emotional care and interpersonal connection aligns with the Feeling preference.

2. Analysis of Other Options:

Option A: Sensing

The Sensing preference involves focusing on concrete details and practical information. While the manager's previous experience in a call center may reflect this, their current focus on emotional support indicates a Feeling preference rather than Sensing.

Eliminate.

Option B: iNtuiting

Intuition focuses on abstract ideas, possibilities, and long-term vision. While Intuition could play a role in managing change, the behavior described is more centered on immediate emotional needs rather than abstract concepts.

Eliminate.

Option C: Thinking

The Thinking preference involves making decisions based on logic and objective criteria. While Thinking is important in management, this scenario focuses on empathy and emotional care rather than logical analysis.

Eliminate.

3. Practical Example of Feeling Behavior:

A manager with a Feeling preference might offer counseling services, check in on staff morale, or prioritize team harmony during periods of organizational change. This aligns with the Customer Services Manager's actions to support overwhelmed team members.

4. Reference to MBTI:

Feeling (F):

Makes decisions based on personal values and empathy.

Focuses on harmony, emotional well-being, and understanding others' perspectives.

Thinking (T):

Makes decisions based on logic and objective analysis.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

This question uses the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) framework. The behavior described aligns most closely with the Judging preference, which is associated with organization, structure, and a desire for clear plans and deadlines.

1. Why the Answer is Judging (C):

The Legal Specialist is focused on establishing deadlines and ensuring their input is scheduled. These traits are characteristic of the Judging preference.

People with a Judging preference prefer:

Planning and structure.

Clarity in schedules and deadlines.

Order and predictability in tasks.

Pressing for specific deadlines and schedules reflects a strong inclination toward structured, organized work.

2. Analysis of Other Options:

Option A: Thinking

The Thinking preference is about decision-making based on logic and objectivity. While the Legal Specialist's assessment of contract impacts involves analysis, their behavior in this scenario focuses on planning and organization rather than logical evaluation.

Eliminate.

Option B: Feeling

The Feeling preference relates to decision-making based on empathy and values. This behavior is not motivated by emotional considerations or interpersonal dynamics but by a focus on task management and structure.

Eliminate.

Option D: Perceiving

The Perceiving preference is characterized by flexibility, adaptability, and a preference for keeping options open. The Legal Specialist’s push for deadlines and structure contrasts with the more fluid, spontaneous approach associated with Perceiving.

Eliminate.

3. Practical Example of Judging Behavior:

A Judging individual might request a clear project timeline with milestone dates to ensure they can prioritize their work effectively. They value predictability and dislike ambiguity, which aligns with the described behavior of the Legal Specialist.

4. Reference to MBTI:

Judging (J):

Focuses on order, structure, and planned decision-making.

Prefers defined timelines and organized approaches to work.

Perceiving (P):

Prefers flexibility, spontaneity, and keeping options open.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Context from the UniCo Scenario:

In a major organizational change like this, active staff involvement is critical to ensure alignment, engagement, and buy-in. Staff members’ questions about skill development and project assignments indicate that they are invested in the success of the change but need direction and inclusion. Effective responses should empower leadership to address these concerns while fostering collaboration and clarity.

Analysis of Each Option:

A. Prepare presentations to all staff outlining the targets for the new structure.

Why Incorrect:While presentations can provide clarity, they are top-down communication and do not address staff engagement directly. This approach misses the opportunity to actively include staff in decision-making or skills development discussions.

B. Support line leadership roles on how to include those asking the questions.

Why Correct:Supporting line leaders ensures that the staff asking questions are actively involved in the process. Line leadership is typically closer to the teams and can effectively include their input in decision-making. This approach aligns with AgilePM principles of empowering teams and fostering collaboration at the operational level.

C. Ask for the communications from the change teams to include the questions.

Why Incorrect:While addressing these questions in communications is helpful, it does not provide a direct platform for staff engagement or influence. This approach risks being seen as a passive response rather than actively resolving concerns.

D. Define the approach and governance for the Customer Services projects.

Why Incorrect:Governance and structure are important, but this response focuses on technical aspects of project delivery rather than addressing staff engagement and their questions about skills development. It does not provide immediate reassurance or inclusion for staff concerns.

Why B Is Correct:

Direct Engagement with Staff Concerns:

By empowering line leadership, the Customer Services Director ensures that staff questions are addressed effectively and incorporated into decision-making. This creates a culture of collaboration and trust.

Alignment with AgilePM Principles:

AgilePM emphasizes empowered teams and engagement at the operational level to drive change successfully. Line leaders are well-positioned to address team concerns directly.

Sustainable Solution:

Supporting line leadership ensures ongoing responsiveness to staff concerns, rather than providing one-off presentations or communications.

References to AgilePM Framework:

Empowered Teams:

AgilePM stresses the role of line leaders in empowering their teams and ensuring effective collaboration. (AgilePM Practitioner Guide, Chapter 6: Empowered Teams)

Stakeholder Engagement:

AgilePM highlights that involving stakeholders directly in decision-making is critical to gaining buy-in and addressing concerns. (AgilePM Practitioner Guide, Chapter 8: Stakeholder Engagement)

Sustained Engagement:

Responses should aim to foster sustained staff engagement and involvement, not just one-time solutions. (AgilePM Practitioner Guide, Chapter 9: Delivering Value Early)

This question examines the application of David Rock's SCARF framework, which identifies five social drivers influencing motivation: Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, and Fairness. In this scenario, the focus is on status, which refers to the perception of one’s standing or importance relative to others in a group.

1. Understanding the Status Domain in SCARF

Status is one of the core social needs in the SCARF framework.

It is linked to how individuals perceive their importance or recognition within an organization.

Acknowledging contributions publicly enhances status by signaling respect and appreciation, which motivates individuals to engage and cooperate.

2. Why Option D is Correct

In this scenario, the Operations Director’s public praise of the Applications Manager acknowledges their cooperation in relocating to a shared workspace.

This public acknowledgment improves the Applications Manager’s informal status within the group by:

Showing that their efforts are valued.

Positioning them as a cooperative and contributing member of the leadership team.

Enhancing status in this way fosters motivation and strengthens engagement in the change process.

3. Analysis of Other Options

Option A: No, because 'status' should be rewarded by ensuring open, two-way communication using rich channels.

While two-way communication is important for building relatedness or addressing concerns, it does not directly address the brain’s need for status, which is driven by recognition and acknowledgment.

Eliminate.

Option B: No, because the Application Manager's knowledge and skills are still relevant and there is no threat to 'status'.

This misinterprets the concept of status. The relevance of skills is unrelated to the need for recognition. Status can still be boosted even when skills are intact, especially in a new environment where informal recognition is key.

Eliminate.

Option C: Yes, because highlighting cooperation provides an opportunity for the Applications Manager to learn and develop.

While cooperation can contribute to learning and development, the focus here is on public acknowledgment of contributions to improve status, not on skill-building or development.

Eliminate.

4. Practical Implications

The public acknowledgment at the Operations group meeting serves to:

Reinforce positive behavior (cooperation during relocation).

Increase the Applications Manager’s informal standing within the leadership team.

Such actions align with the SCARF framework by addressing social motivations and fostering collaboration.

5. Reference to SCARF Framework

Status: Enhancing motivation by recognizing contributions publicly, which boosts an individual’s perceived value.

Threats to status (e.g., moving to a shared workspace) can be mitigated by public praise, maintaining the individual's perception of importance.