Free Practice Questions for APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam

The correct answer is A .

If the Developers have estimated work using Planning Poker and story points , the right next step is to use a planning approach that helps Hira understand how much work the teams can realistically complete in a Sprint. This supports forecasting the likely number of Sprints required.

Why A is correct:

It keeps estimation in the same agile framework.

It uses the team’s practical delivery capability to forecast Sprint outcomes.

It avoids false precision while still giving Hira a useful basis for planning.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B is incorrect because converting story points directly into person-days undermines the purpose of relative estimation and can create misleading precision.

C is incorrect because assigning average time allocations to every item is too mechanical and not how AgilePM typically uses story-point-based estimation.

D is incorrect because Planning Poker is already an appropriate technique. There is no need to discard it simply because Hira needs a forecast.

So the best answer is A .

B. Yes, because the acceptance criteria might need to be changed during the Solution Development Timebox.

Rationale:

In Agile Project Management, flexibility is key. It is important to prioritize work based on the value it provides and the necessity of the requirement. " Should Have " requirements are important but not critical, and they can be subject to change as the project progresses and as more information becomes available. Deferring the detailed setting of acceptance criteria for a " Should Have " requirement that might be dropped is a practical approach to managing workload and focusing efforts on the most critical aspects of the project first. This approach is in line with Agile ' s principle of responding to change over following a fixed plan.

Advise how the legislation on the transfer of data will affect the requirements and the system.

E. Business Analyst

Agree the changes needed to the corporate technical architecture with the Architecture Angels IT support team.

D. Technical Coordinator

Ensure the information security vulnerability is communicated to the AA Head Office IT Director.

A. Project Manager

Evaluate the impact of proposed security controls on the business and decide on the most suitable solution.

B. Business Sponsor

Reprioritise the requirements on the Prioritised Requirements List associated with the security issue.

C. Business Visionary

Rationale:

A Business Analyst typically has the expertise to understand and communicate how data transfer legislation impacts system requirements.

The Technical Coordinator is usually responsible for technical decisions, including those that impact the technical architecture, and would work closely with the IT support team to agree on changes.

The Project Manager should ensure that key information, such as security vulnerabilities, is communicated to senior management, in this case, the IT Director.

The Business Sponsor, who is ultimately responsible for the project from a business perspective, would evaluate the impact of security measures on the business.

The Business Visionary is often tasked with understanding the strategic view of the project requirements and would be suited to reprioritize requirements, especially those with significant implications like security issues.

A. Yes, because this will allow the Solution Development Team to focus on the quality of the Solution Development Timebox ' s deliverable as a whole, in order to keep focus on the business need.

Rationale:

Setting acceptance criteria for the overall deliverables of a timebox is a key practice in Agile to ensure that the work meets the business objectives and quality expectations. It helps the Solution Development Team to understand what is required for the deliverables to be considered complete and acceptable. This aligns with the Agile principle of delivering quality and maintaining a constant pace of development. It also ensures that all team members are aligned on the goals and can focus on delivering value in line with business needs.

A. Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.

Rationale:

Agile Project Management is adaptable to changes, even late in the development process. The introduction of a new Health and Safety requirement, such as wheelchair access, which is a legal and must-have requirement, needs to be incorporated into the project as soon as it is identified. Working with the Local Planning Authority Officer to define acceptance criteria ensures that the requirement is clearly understood and that the solution developed meets the necessary legal standards. This approach ensures that the team can immediately address the new requirement and integrate it into the current work cycle, aligning with Agile ' s principle of welcoming changing requirements, even late in development, for the customer ' s competitive advantage.

The initial action to deal with the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B should be:

• C. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels’ Senior Management Team.

This is because the lack of a fire escape is a significant safety concern that could have legal and regulatory implications. It’s important that the Senior Management Team is aware of this issue so they can make informed decisions about how to address it. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, is well-positioned to understand the technical implications of this issue and communicate them to the Senior Management Team.

While revising the Timebox Plans (option A) or commencing understanding and delivering the new requirement (option B) could be part of the solution, these actions should be taken after the issue has been escalated and discussed with the Senior Management Team. Escalating the issue to the Marketing Director (option D) may not be the most effective course of action, as this is primarily a technical and safety issue, not a marketing one.