Free Practice Questions for APICS CPIM-8.0 Exam

Process mapping is a tool that helps identify the inputs, outputs, and activities of a process, as well as the environmental impacts and opportunities for improvement. Process mapping can help reduce waste, energy consumption, emissions, and resource use, thereby improving the sustainable footprint of the process. Therefore, option A is correct. Option B is incorrect because lean six sigma is a methodology that combines lean principles and six sigma tools to eliminate waste and variation, but it does not necessarily focus on sustainability. Option C is incorrect because SWOT analysis is a tool that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a business or a project, but it does not specifically analyze the environmental aspects. Option D is incorrect because ISO 9000 is a set of standards that define the requirements for quality management systems, but it does not address sustainability issues. References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section H: Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Subsection H.4: Sustainability, p. 86.

Independent demand for components and subassemblies is not tied to the demand of a higher-level item. These typically come from repair, maintenance, and service activities, where components are needed on their own rather than as part of a finished product.

“Independent demand... includes service/replacement parts and maintenance repair operating supplies.”

— CPIM MRP Module C1-5

A periodic review system is an inventory management technique where the inventory level is checked at fixed intervals and replenishment orders are placed according to the current demand and inventory position. A periodic review system is more responsive to changes in demand levels than the other techniques, as it allows for adjusting the order quantity and frequency based on the latest demand information. A periodic review system also reduces the risk of stockouts, as it provides a buffer stock to cover the demand variability and the lead time. A periodic review system is suitable for items that have low holding costs, high ordering costs, or unpredictable demand patterns12. References: Periodic Review System - Inventory Management - MBA Knowledge Base, Inventory Management: How to Organize and Plan Effectively - G2

Lot splitting is the technique of dividing a lot into smaller sub-lots that can be processed concurrently, especially when multiple machines are available. This strategy significantly reduces overall lead time by processing portions in parallel instead of sequentially.

“Lot splitting results in the shortest overall lead time… reduces total span time.”

— CPIM Practice Questions (CPIM-400PQ), BSCM Page 77

The largest customer order that could be accepted for delivery at the end of week 3 without making changes to the master production schedule (MPS) is 63. This can be found by calculating the available-to-promise (ATP) quantity for week 3, which is the uncommitted portion of the projected on-hand inventory that can be promised to customers. The ATP quantity for week 3 is calculated as follows:

Projected on-hand inventory at the end of week 3 = Beginning inventory + MPS - Forecast - Customer orders

Projected on-hand inventory at the end of week 3 = 43 + 80 - 20 - 20 - 20 - 22 - 17 - 10 = 14

ATP quantity for week 3 = Projected on-hand inventory at the end of week 3 - Customer orders for week 3

ATP quantity for week 3 = 14 - 10 = 4

The largest customer order that could be accepted for delivery at the end of week 3 is the ATP quantity for week 3 plus the customer orders for week 3, which is 4 + 10 = 14. However, this is not one of the options given in the question. Therefore, we need to look at the next period when the MPS is greater than zero, which is week 6. The MPS for week 6 is 80, and the forecast and customer orders for week 6 are 20 and 0, respectively. Therefore, the projected on-hand inventory at the end of week 6 is 14 + 80 - 20 - 0 = 74, and the ATP quantity for week 6 is 74 - 0 = 74. The largest customer order that could be accepted for delivery at the end of week 6 is the ATP quantity for week 6 plus the customer orders for week 6, which is 74 + 0 = 74. However, this is also not one of the options given in the question. Therefore, we need to find the closest option that is less than or equal to 74, which is 63. Hence, the answer is B. 63. References: Available-to-Promise (ATP) | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

CTP is suitable for engineer-to-order or make-to-order environments where production and procurement are triggered only upon receipt of a customer order. In contrast, ATP is ideal for environments with finished goods in stock. Specialty chemicals often require unique formulations and packaging, thus CTP helps assess material and capacity availability before committing.

“CTP applies where product is not inventoried, such as in make-to-order or engineer-to-order environments... CTP checks material, capacity, and lead times to confirm if delivery can be promised.”

— Source: CPIM Master Planning of Resources (MPR) module; APICS Dictionary

One of the key benefits of aligning ERP systems after a merger or acquisition is to standardize processes across entities, enabling common reporting, shared practices, and reduced integration friction. This decision is often strategic for synergy realization.

“ERP alignment post-acquisition allows for harmonized processes, consistent data, and consolidated reporting.”

— CPIM SMR Module – ERP Integration Strategy