Free Practice Questions for API API-571 Exam

According to API RP 571, in the section on Boiler Water Condensate Corrosion:

“The major contributors to condensate corrosion are dissolved CO₂ and O₂. Carbon dioxide forms carbonic acid in the presence of water, lowering pH and causing generalized corrosion.”

“Oxygen causes pitting and localized corrosion unless chemically treated.”

Thus, option B (Carbon dioxide and oxygen) is the primary root cause and the correct answer.

From API RP 571 and RP 932-B:

“In hydroprocessing reactor effluent systems, the most common corrosion mechanism is ammonium bisulfide (NH₄HS) corrosion, which forms in the presence of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia.”

“NH₄HS attacks carbon steel aggressively under turbulent flow and at low pH.”

Correct answer is B – ammonium bisulfide corrosion.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Naphthenic Acid Corrosion (NAC) occurs in high-temperature refinery streams (typically 450–750 °F / 230–400 °C) containing organic acids. According to API RP 571, NAC is particularly aggressive toward carbon steels and low-alloy steels, and resistance improves with increasing chromium and molybdenum content, but is best with titanium.

Titanium exhibits exceptional resistance to NAC due to the formation of a stable, protective oxide film that is not attacked by naphthenic acids. API RP 571 identifies titanium as one of the most resistant materials available for severe NAC environments.

Why the other options are less suitable:

Option B (9 Cr-1 Mo steel) has limited resistance and is still susceptible at higher TAN and velocities.

Option C (317 stainless steel) offers improved resistance but can still experience attack under severe NAC conditions.

Option D (321 stainless steel) has lower molybdenum content than 317 SS, making it less resistant.

API RP 571 explicitly notes that titanium provides superior resistance compared to stainless steels and Cr-Mo alloys in NAC service.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Naphthenic Acid Corrosion

API Corrosion and Materials Selection Study Guide

API RP 571 on HTHA states:

“Acoustic emission testing is not currently a proven or reliable method for identifying HTHA in refinery components.”

“HTHA typically occurs internally, not as surface blisters, and is not limited to welds. Austenitic (300 series) stainless steels are generally resistant at normal refinery conditions.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.1.3 – High Temperature Hydrogen Attack)

Thus, option A is the most accurate statement.

According to API RP 571 Section 5.3.2.1 (Creep):

“Creep damage is exponentially dependent on temperature. A small increase in temperature (e.g., 25°F or 15°C) can reduce remaining life by more than half. This is because the creep rate increases rapidly with temperature, especially above design limits.”

Stress is a contributing factor, but the dominant and most sensitive variable is temperature.

Thus, Option C (increase in temperature of 25°F/15°C) is the correct answer.

API RP 571 describes under Caustic Corrosion:

“One of the significant contributing factors is caustic accumulation in low-flow or stagnant areas, especially in heat-traced lines or around steam injection points.”

“Localized heating can concentrate caustic solutions, promoting corrosion even in carbon or stainless steels.”

Thus, option C (heat-traced equipment) is the correct and technically accurate choice.

According to API RP 571, under Naphthenic Acid Corrosion (NAC):

“The most severe corrosion is typically found in areas of high velocity and turbulence, such as at pump around nozzles, transfer lines, elbows, reducers, and orifices.”

“NAC is characterized by uniform thinning and can accelerate significantly where flow-induced erosion is present.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.4.1 – Naphthenic Acid Corrosion)

This clearly establishes that high velocity and turbulence increase NAC severity, making option D correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571, temper embrittlement is a metallurgical condition that affects Cr-Mo low-alloy steels, including 1-1/4 Cr-1/2 Mo, when exposed to temperatures typically in the range of 650 °F to 1100 °F (345 °C to 595 °C) over extended periods. This damage mechanism results in a significant loss of fracture toughness and ductility, particularly at lower temperatures.

API RP 939-C further explains that temper embrittlement does not significantly reduce tensile strength, but it raises the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT). As a result, equipment that appears structurally sound may fail catastrophically under sudden loading conditions.

Once ductility is reduced, the material becomes especially vulnerable to rapid temperature changes, which induce high thermal stresses. Thermal shock is therefore a critical secondary damage mechanism. Sudden quenching, cold feed introduction, startup, shutdown, or uneven heating can cause cracking because the embrittled material can no longer accommodate strain plastically.

Option A (Ductile rupture) is incorrect because temper embrittlement promotes brittle fracture, not ductile failure.

Option B (885 °F embrittlement) is incorrect because 885 °F (475 °C) embrittlement primarily affects carbon steels and some stainless steels, not Cr-Mo steels.

Option D (Graphitization) occurs at prolonged exposure above approximately 800 °F (425 °C) in carbon steels and is not the dominant concern for 1-1/4 Cr-1/2 Mo steel in this context.

API RP 571 explicitly emphasizes that embrittled Cr-Mo steels are highly susceptible to cracking during thermal transients, making thermal shock the most likely and dangerous subsequent damage mechanism.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Temper Embrittlement of Low-Alloy Steels

API RP 939-C – Metallurgical Effects and Service Risks of Temper Embrittlement

======================

API RP 571, under "Caustic Corrosion" (also referred to as Caustic Stress Corrosion Cracking or Caustic Cracking), notes that this form of damage is:

“Most commonly associated with the injection points of caustic (e.g., NaOH) in crude units, particularly upstream of desalter vessels and heat exchanger circuits.”

“This damage occurs due to the combination of caustic environment and tensile stress, especially in carbon steel and low alloy steels.”

“Stress relief heat treatment of welds can mitigate susceptibility.”

(Reference: API RP 571, 3rd Edition, Section 4.2.2.3)

Thus, among the options, caustic injections in crude units are the most typical area of concern, making option C the correct answer.

API RP 571 notes in the context of Hydrochloric Acid Corrosion in overhead condensers:

“Titanium is highly resistant to low pH acidic aqueous phases, including hydrochloric acid formed during condensation in overhead systems.”

“Stainless steels like 316 and 410 are not suitable in the presence of free chlorides at low pH and elevated temperatures.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.3.3 – Hydrochloric Acid Corrosion)

Thus, Titanium is the preferred alloy under the described acidic and high-temperature conditions, making option B correct.