Free Practice Questions for ACAMS CAMS-FCI Exam

The total suspicious transaction amount that the investigator should report is 659,000,000 USD. This is the sum of the two transactions involving the LLC and the state-run oil company, which are 59,000,000 USD and 600,000,000 USD respectively. The other transactions that the LLC made to other accounts, a money brokerage firm, and real estate purchases are not relevant to the question, as they are not part of the series of transactions that triggered the alert.

References: Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification | ACAMS

The statement that most accurately characterizes the methods used by transnational criminal organizations is that they routinely engage in many different types of criminal activities as long as they think it will benefit them ©. This is because transnational criminal organizations are flexible and adaptable, and they exploit opportunities and vulnerabilities in different markets and jurisdictions. According to ACAMS2, “Transnational criminal organizations are involved in a wide range of illicit activities, such as drug trafficking, human trafficking, arms trafficking, money laundering, cybercrime, environmental crime, fraud, corruption, and terrorism” (p. 3). They also “operate across borders and regions, using complex networks and structures to evade detection and prosecution” (p. 3).

The other statements are not as accurate or comprehensive as option C. Transnational criminal organizations are unlikely to associate with known terrorist organizations due to the reputational risks (A) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may collaborate or cooperate with terrorist organizations for mutual benefit or convenience, such as sharing resources, routes, or contacts. Transnational criminal organizations are likely to specialize in one particular method and continue to refine that method to escape detection (B) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may diversify or change their methods depending on the circumstances or opportunities, such as shifting products, markets, or modus operandi. Transnational criminal organizations see each other as competitors and rarely cooperate (D) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may form alliances or partnerships with other criminal groups for strategic or tactical reasons, such as sharing information, expertise, or influence.

The correct answer is C because the FI is unable to obtain evidence of required licensing or registration despite suspicion of money transmitting, which is a red flag for money laundering and a violation of federal and state laws. Option A is incorrect because making several deposits in one month that appear to exceed their expected monthly income might not be indicative of suspicious activity, depending on the customer’s profile and source of funds. Option B is incorrect because receiving a large, one-time wire from a law firm might not be indicative of suspicious activity, depending on the customer’s relationship with the law firm and the purpose of the wire. Option D is incorrect because discovering a large number of securities transactions that appear to be related to day trading might not be indicative of suspicious activity, depending on the customer’s investment strategy and risk tolerance.

References: Money transmitter - Wikipedia; The Quick Guide To Money Transmitter Licenses - Surety Bond Insider; Financial Crime Typologies - Intermediate Certificate, Module 3.

The SAR/STR should include any information that is relevant to the suspicious activity, such as the customer information, the transaction details, and any other indicators of potential money laundering or criminal activity. The fact that one of the transactors occasionally smelled of marijuana smoke is an indicator that the customer may be involved in the illicit drug trade, which is a predicate offense for money laundering. Therefore, this information should be included in the SAR/STR. References: Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, page 25.

The correct answers are B and C because these are the most relevant and reasonable steps for the investigations team to perform enhanced due diligence on the operations of the foreign bank and its customers. Asking for the risk rating, customer profiles, and official licenses would help the team assess the level of risk and compliance of the foreign bank and its customers, who are engaged in a high-risk activity of exporting scrap gold and silver. The other options are not appropriate because they are either premature or ineffective. Rescinding the contract, filing a SAR/STR, or closing the accounts would require more evidence and justification, and they may also damage the relationship with the foreign bank.

References: : Precious Metals & Stones

A more robust supervisory approach is needed by regulators when overseeing small- and medium-sized MSBs compared to larger MSBs for combatting TF because small- and medium-sized MSBs are more at risk of allowing transactions linked to TF due to the lack of skilled compliance resources. Small- and medium-sized MSBs may face challenges in implementing effective AML/CFT controls, such as conducting risk assessments, applying customer due diligence measures, monitoring transactions, detecting suspicious activities, and reporting to the authorities. They may also have limited access to training, guidance, and tools to enhance their compliance capabilities. Therefore, regulators need to provide more supervision and support to small- and medium-sized MSBs to ensure that they comply with the AML/CFT requirements and mitigate the TF risks.

References:

Sustainable Growth for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises … - MDPI

Lessons on Resilience for Small and Midsize Businesses - HBR

A SAR/STR narrative that is useful to law enforcement should include a detailed description of the known or suspected criminal violation or suspicious activity, as well as ensure that all information in the SAR/STR is complete and accurate based on what the institution knows. These elements help law enforcement to understand the nature and scope of the suspicious activity, and to follow up with further investigation if needed. The other options are not essential for a useful SAR/STR narrative, as they either provide irrelevant or redundant information, or could compromise the confidentiality of the report.

The identification details of the beneficial owner and authorized signatory are key for law enforcement’s physical surveillance of cash activity, as they would help identify the person who controls and operates the company and who is responsible for its financial transactions. The company’s operating address is also key, as it would help locate the premises where the cash activity takes place and observe any suspicious movements or behaviors. The identification details of the nominee shareholder and directors are not relevant, as they are not involved in the management or operation of the company. The company’s registered address is also not relevant, as it is likely to be a shell or mailbox address that does not reflect the actual location of the business.

References: Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, page 44-45; [FATF Guidance on Transparency and Beneficial Ownership], page 12-13.

The FI is required to ensure that the request includes an end date © when it receives a keep open letter from LE for the identified account. This is because the FI has to balance its legal obligations to cooperate with LE and to protect its customers’ privacy and rights. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, “the FI should request a written confirmation from LE that includes a specific end date for the request, as well as a point of contact for any questions or concerns” (p. 35). The FI should also document the request and its compliance with it, and continue to monitor the account for any suspicious activity.

The other options are not correct. The FI should not contact the client for information relating to the account (A), as this could compromise the LE investigation or alert the client of the suspicion. The FI should not stop filing SAR/STR reports on the account and/or customer (B), as this could violate its regulatory obligations and expose it to legal risks. The FI should not notify LE immediately after new transactions (D), as this could also interfere with the LE investigation or tip off the client. The FI should follow the instructions of LE regarding when and how to share information.