Free Practice Questions for iSQI TMMi-P_Syll2.1 Exam

The process area Advanced Reviews belongs to TMMi Level 4 (Measured). At this maturity level, the focus is on quantitatively measuring and managing product quality, and advanced review techniques are employed to integrate peer reviews (static testing) with dynamic testing. These advanced reviews play a key role in ensuring that product quality is assessed early in the lifecycle and that testing is driven by measurable goals.

This statement is false because the CMMI does not have defined levels specifically for testing maturity. The CMMI model is more general and focuses on overall process improvement across various disciplines, including but not limited to testing. CMMI includes practices like verification and validation but does not specifically address a structured path to testing maturity, unlike TMMi, which defines specific levels for testing process maturity. Therefore, statement D is incorrect.

The description provided, "Testing is a thoroughly defined, well-founded, and measurable process. Testing is perceived as evaluation; it consists of all lifecycle activities concerned with checking products and related work products," corresponds to TMMi Level 4, which is labelled "Measured." At this level, testing processes are quantitatively measured, and there is a strong focus on evaluating product and process quality using quantitative metrics. Testing is integrated throughout the lifecycle and becomes a predictable, measurable process that supports organisational goals.

In the scenario described, testing is performed ad hoc by business analysts who do not have defined test roles or a structured career path within the organisation. The process area that needs attention here is Test Organization (TMMi Level 3). This process area is crucial for establishing a structured test group with dedicated roles and responsibilities for testing, rather than relying on business analysts for testing as a secondary task.

The Test Organization process area focuses on establishing a formalised test organisation within the company, defining test functions and responsibilities, and promoting testing as a recognised profession with defined career paths. This would address the shortcomings of the current setup by creating a dedicated, skilled testing team, thus improving the consistency and quality of testing activities within the bank​​.

In an Agile context, some practices from TMMi levels 4 and 5 might be considered less relevant or adjusted to fit the Agile methodology. Specifically, at TMMi level 5, testing with statistical methods may indeed be less relevant. In Agile projects, operational profiles or usage models, which are essential to perform statistically valid testing, are often not utilised. Agile methodologies focus more on incremental development and continuous feedback loops, which do not typically rely on statistical sampling methods. Therefore, the statement that "Agile projects normally do not use operational profiles or usage models of a product on which to base statistically valid inferences to help create a representative sample of tests, thus the TMMi level 5 specific goal 'Testing is performed using Statistical Methods' is considered not relevant in an Agile context" is true​.

Regular code reviews and architectural reviews are part of the Advanced Reviews process area, which belongs to TMMi Level 4. This process area emphasizes conducting static reviews (e.g., code and design reviews) early in the lifecycle to measure product quality and adjust the testing strategy based on the insights gained from these reviews.

TMMi References:

The Advanced Reviews process area in TMMi Level 4 aims to ensure that static testing activities such as code and architectural reviews are used to measure product quality early in the lifecycle​​.

To improve the management and control of test environments, one of the specific practices under SG 3 (Manage and Control Test Environments) of the Test Environment process area is to coordinate the availability and usage of test environments. This involves managing reservations, scheduling, and ensuring the efficient use of test environments across different projects. This practice is essential for ensuring that the test environments are available when needed, reducing delays, and improving the overall efficiency of the testing process.

The debugging-oriented phase of the evolutionary testing model aligns closely with TMMi Level 1 (Initial). At TMMi Level 1, testing is often chaotic and is not formally separated from debugging. The primary focus is on finding and fixing bugs, which reflects the characteristics of the debugging-oriented phase described in the Gelperin and Hetzel evolutionary testing model. Testing at this level lacks structure and is mainly an ad hoc activity aimed at removing defects from the software.

The specific practice “Revise the product risks as appropriate” is not directly tied to a specific goal within the Advanced Reviews process area at TMMi Level 4. While Advanced Reviews do involve coordinating reviews with risk-based testing and adjusting the test approach, revising product risks is a broader concept typically associated with product risk management as part of test planning and not exclusively with Advanced Reviews.

The specific goals of the Test Process Optimization process area at TMMi Level 5 include:

Select test process improvements.

Evaluate new testing technologies to determine their impact on the testing process.

Deploy test process improvements.

However, "Determine, plan and implement test process improvements" (2) and "Monitor product quality against plan and expectations" (5) are not part of the Test Process Optimization goals. Instead, these activities belong to other process areas, such as Test Measurement or earlier maturity levels.

TMMi References:

The goals for Test Process Optimization at TMMi Level 5 focus on selecting and deploying process improvements and evaluating new technologies​​.