Free Practice Questions for Scrum SAFe-Practitioner Exam

 Providing autonomy is one approach to unlock the intrinsic motivation of knowledge workers. Autonomy means giving knowledge workers the freedom and responsibility to make decisions about their work, such as how to do it, when to do it, and who to do it with. Autonomy fosters a sense of ownership, empowerment, and self-determination, which are essential for creativity and innovation. Autonomy also supports the Lean-Agile principle of decentralizing decision-making, which enables faster and better outcomes. SAFe provides several mechanisms to enable autonomy for knowledge workers, such as self-organizing and self-managing Agile teams, ARTs and Solution Trains, Communities of Practice, and Innovation and Planning Iterations. References: = Unlock the Intrinsic Motivation of Knowledge Workers, Decentralize Decision-Making, Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe® Practitioner

Acceptance criteria are the conditions that a story must satisfy to be accepted by the Product Owner and the stakeholders. They define the boundaries of the story and provide guidance on how to test it for completion. Acceptance criteria are usually written as a list of statements or scenarios that describe the expected behavior and outcomes of the story. They help to ensure that the story delivers value to the user and meets the Definition of Done1234. References: Story - Scaled Agile Framework, How to Write Agile Test Case Requirements | SmartBear, Agile Story Completion Checklist - SDLCforms, Module 2: Complete a story - IBM

 Product roles, such as Product Owner and Product Manager, act as proxies for the customer in representing their needs to the teams. They are responsible for defining, prioritizing, and validating the requirements that deliver value to the customer and the business. They also collaborate with the development teams and other stakeholders to ensure that the product vision, strategy, and roadmap are aligned with customer and stakeholder needs. Product roles are the voice of the customer for the teams and the primary link to business and technology strategy12. References: = 1: Product Owner - Scaled Agile Framework2; 2: Product Manager - Scaled Agile Framework3

Resizing the work is one method for reducing queue length in SAFe. Queue length is the number of work items waiting to be processed in a system. Reducing queue length can improve flow, reduce cycle time, and increase throughput. Resizing the work means breaking down large work items into smaller ones that can be completed faster and with less variability. Smaller work items also reduce the risk of rework, defects, and delays. Resizing the work can be done at any level of SAFe, from portfolio epics to team stories. SAFe provides several techniques for resizing the work, such as Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF), Minimum Marketable Features (MMFs), Minimum Viable Products (MVPs), and Spikes1. References: Principle #6 - Visualize and Limit WIP, Reduce Batch Sizes, and Manage Queue Lengths - Scaled Agile Framework

The principle that includes “working software is the primary measure of progress” is one of the twelve principles behind the Agile Manifesto. The Agile Manifesto is a declaration of four values and twelve principles that guide the Agile software development movement. The value that corresponds to this principle is “working software over comprehensive documentation”. The principle states that the ultimate goal of any software development project is to deliver working software that satisfies the customer’s needs and expectations, and that any other intermediate or auxiliary artifacts, such as plans, documents, models, or reports, are secondary and should not distract from the main objective. The principle also implies that working software should be delivered frequently and continuously, and that the progress of the project should be measured by the amount and quality of the software delivered, not by the adherence to a predefined plan or schedule. References: Principles behind the Agile Manifesto, Agile Manifesto - Scaled Agile Framework

The confidence vote is a measure of the teams’ and ARTs’ belief in their ability to deliver the established PI objectives. It is conducted at the end of the PI planning event, after the teams have presented their plans and identified the risks. Each person votes using their fingers (fist of five) or a digital tool for remote events. The scale is as follows:

5: I am confident we can meet or exceed our objectives

4: I am confident we can meet our objectives

3: I think we can meet our objectives, but I have some concerns

2: I doubt we can meet our objectives, and I have major concerns

1: I am sure we cannot meet our objectives

The purpose of the confidence vote is to surface any issues or impediments that might prevent the teams from achieving their goals. It also helps to align the expectations of the stakeholders and the teams. If the average vote is below 3, the teams and the ARTs need to revisit their plans and address the root causes of the low confidence. The confidence vote is repeated until the average vote is 3 or higher, or until the timebox expires. References: PI Planning - Scaled Agile Framework, Confidence Vote - Scaled Agile Framework, Confidence Vote in PI Planning: Role and Benefits - Dee Project Manager

n: Agile development is more beneficial than waterfall development because it increases productivity and employee engagement by empowering teams to self-organize, collaborate, and deliver value in small increments. It also allows businesses to deliver value to the market more quickly by reducing the feedback cycle, adapting to changing requirements, and releasing high-quality products frequently. References: SAFe® for Teams - Know Your Role on an Agile Team, Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe® Practitioner, Lean-Agile Mindset, Continuous Delivery Pipeline

 A Feature is a service that fulfills a stakeholder need and delivers business value. One key component of a Feature is the benefit hypothesis, which is a statement that describes the expected outcome and value of the Feature for the end user or the business1. The benefit hypothesis helps to define the scope, priority, and acceptance criteria of the Feature, and to measure its impact and effectiveness after implementation2. The benefit hypothesis also supports the Lean UX process model, which includes a definition of the Minimum Marketable Feature (MMF), a benefit hypothesis, and acceptance criteria3. The other options are not key components of a Feature, although they may be related to it. A business plan is a document that outlines the goals, strategies, and financial projections of a business or a product, and it may include some features, but it is not a component of a Feature. Key stakeholders are the people or groups who have an interest or influence in the product or the Feature, and they may provide input or feedback, but they are not a component of a Feature. A release plan is a schedule that shows when the product or the Feature will be delivered to the customers or users, and it may depend on the Feature, but it is not a component of a Feature. References: Features and Capabilities - Scaled Agile Framework, What Are The Minimum Requirements For A Feature? SAFe, Agile - airfocus, Lean UX - Scaled Agile Framework

 = An empathy map is a tool used to better understand and empathize with a specific group of people, such as customers or users. It helps teams gain deeper insights into the thoughts, feelings, needs, and behaviors of the target audience. An empathy map consists of four quadrants that reflect what the user said, did, thought, and felt during the research phase. An empathy map helps to synthesize the user data, identify the user needs, and generate insights for the design challenge. References: = Empathy Map – Why and How to Use It | IxDF, What Is an Empathy Map? [Complete Guide] - CareerFoundry, What Is an Empathy Map? | Coursera

The final agenda item of PI Planning is the Planning Retrospective. This is where the ART reflects on the PI Planning event itself and identifies improvements for the next planning session.

The SAFe 6.0 guidance states:

“The PI Planning event ends with a retrospective. Teams and stakeholders reflect on the process, identify improvements, and create actionable items for the next PI Planning.”

This ensures continuous improvement of the PI Planning process itself.

Surfacing risks (A), reviewing the final plan (B), and assigning Business Value (D) all happen earlier in the PI Planning agenda.

The retrospective is always the final step before closing the PI Planning event.