Free Practice Questions for OMG OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Exam

A fundamental goal of UPDM is to define a common means of expressing DoDAF and MODAF architectures using the same underlying metamodel. UPDM is a UML profile that supports both DoDAF and MODAF, which are two main architectural frameworks used in the defense domain. UPDM provides a common set of elements and relationships that can be used to represent architectures in either framework, using a Domain Metamodel that captures the core concepts of both frameworks. UPDM also provides mappings to UML and SysML concepts to enable implementation and integration with other modeling languages and tools. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://www.omg.org/updm/

 A systems engineering methodology is a collection of related processes, methods, and tools that support the discipline of systems engineering in a specific context. The activities in a typical systems engineering methodology are applied iteratively, meaning that they are repeated and refined until a satisfactory solution is achieved. The activities are not applied sequentially, meaning that they are not performed in a fixed order without revisiting previous steps. The activities cannot be performed in any order, because they have logical dependencies and prerequisites. The activities do not work just as well for specialty engineering activities, because they may require different processes, methods, and tools

The most significant deficiency impeding widespread use of SysML (without MARTE) in the real-time and embedded domain is a quantifiable notion of time and resources. SysML does not provide a standard way to model time-related properties or constraints, such as deadlines, periods, durations, clocks, etc., nor does it provide a standard way to model resource-related properties or constraints, such as memory, CPU, power, etc. These aspects are essential for real-time and embedded systems design and analysis. MARTE addresses this deficiency by providing concepts and annotations for modeling time and resources in a precise and quantitative way. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://www.omg.org/spec/MARTE/1.2/About-MARTE/

This recommendation would be most effective from a MBSE perspective because it allows the system engineer and the analysts to leverage the SysML model as a source of design information and analysis input. A SysML model is a graphical and textual representation of a system and its structure, behavior, requirements, etc. By creating a SysML model for capturing the design of different types of smart-home systems, the system engineer can specify the relevant design details necessary for evaluation, such as parameters, constraints, properties, etc. The analysts can then set up executable templates/scripts to generate analysis models from the SysML model using various methods and tools. This way, the analysts can ensure that their analysis models incorporate the latest design information and are easily adaptable for different types of smart-home systems. The system engineer and the analysts can also use allocation or synchronization mechanisms to link the SysML model and the analysis models and propagate changes between them. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://sysml.org/tutorials/sysml-diagram-tutorial/

The kind of models that can be exchanged using XMI are instances of MOF models. MOF (Meta-Object Facility) is a standard that defines a metamodeling architecture and a set of metamodels for creating and manipulating models. A metamodel is a model that defines the abstract syntax and semantics of another model. A model is an instance of a metamodel that conforms to its rules and constraints. XMI (XML Metadata Interchange) is a format specification that enables the interchange of objects and models through an XML formatted file. It is based on a metamodel that defines the mapping of MOF concepts to XML concepts. By using XMI, any model that is an instance of a MOF metamodel can be serialized and deserialized in terms of XML elements and attributes. This includes UML, SysML, and other modeling languages that are defined as MOF metamodels. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://www.omg.org/spec/XMI/2.5.1/About-XMI/

The purpose of the Domain Metamodel in UPDM is to define the metamodel concepts and relationships without any implementation. The Domain Metamodel captures the core concepts of DoDAF and MODAF in terms of entities, attributes, associations, and constraints. It does not specify how these concepts are implemented in UML, SysML, or any other language or tool. The Domain Metamodel serves as a requirements model for UPDM and provides traceability links between the domain concepts and the profile elements. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://www.omg.org/updm/

The most important factors that the engineer should consider when advising the team on how MBSE methodology impacts the PLM solution are the spectrum of models the company uses across the system lifecycle, how model elements can be related to each other, and how theserelationships are supported by PLM tools. The spectrum of models refers to the different types, levels and views of models that are used to represent different aspects and phases of the system development, such as requirements, design, analysis, verification and validation. The relationships between model elements refer to the traceability, consistency and dependency links that connect different elements within and across models. The support by PLM tools refers to the ability of the tools to store, manage, access and integrate the models and their relationships throughout the system lifecycle. These factors are important because they affect how well the MBSE methodology can be implemented and executed using the PLM solution. How manufacturing, test and integration methods can be driven by system models is a less important factor that may not be relevant to all systems or projects. The high cost of maintaining modeling tools and modeling proficiency training is a less important factor that may not be specific to MBSE methodology or PLM solution. How well any proposed MBSE methodology interfaces with the company’s Model Driven Software Development methodology is a less important factor that may not apply to all systems or projects. How outputs of system models, software models, and hardware models are archived in Product Data Management (PDM) tools is a less important factor that may not reflect the full potential of MBSE methodology or PLM solution. References: OMG-Certified Systems Modeling Professional - Model Builder – Advanced (OCUP2-ADV) Examination Guide Version 1.0, Section 4.5

 The main difference between software development methodologies and systems development methodologies is that software development methodologies tend to focus on high quality code, such as functionality, reliability, performance and maintainability, while systems developmentmethodologies tend to focus on holistic issues, such as stakeholder needs, system boundaries, interfaces, trade-offs and lifecycle management. Software development methodologies are usually applied to software-intensive systems or subsystems, while systems development methodologies are usually applied to complex systems that involve multiple disciplines and domains. It is not true that all current systems development methodologies are extensions of previous software development methodologies, as some systems development methodologies have different origins and foundations. It is not true that software development methodologies employ formal architecting techniques, while systems development methodologies tend not to, as both types of methodologies can use different levels of formality and rigor in their architecting approaches. It is not true that for software intensive systems, there is effectively no difference between system development methodologies and software development methodologies, as software intensive systems still require a broader and deeper perspective than software development methodologies can provide. It is not true that there is no difference between any methodology good for software development and any methodology good for systems development, as different types of systems may require different types of methodologies that suit their characteristics and challenges. References: OMG-Certified Systems Modeling Professional - Model Builder – Advanced (OCUP2-ADV) Examination Guide Version 1.0, Section 4.5

The quality of models relates to the quality of the modeling language used to express them in that model quality benefits from the degree of syntactical and semantic formalism supported by the modeling language. Syntactical and semantic formalism refers to the rules and meanings that define how the modeling language elements and relationships can be used and interpreted. A high degree of syntactical and semantic formalism can help improve the clarity, consistency and correctness of the models and avoid ambiguity, inconsistency and error. A high degree of syntactical and semantic formalism can also enable automated analysis, verification and validation of the models. The modeling language does not have to be applicable to a wide range of domains of practice in order to produce high-quality models, as some modeling languages may be more suitable or specialized for certain domains than others. The level of comprehensibility of the modeling language’s abstract syntax does not directly correspond to the quality of the models, as abstract syntax is only one aspect of the modeling language that defines its structure and notation. The quality of the modeling language does influence the quality of the models because the quality of the models depends not only on the skill and knowledge of the modeler but also on the expressiveness and precision of the modeling language. References: OMG-Certified Systems Modeling Professional - Model Builder – Advanced (OCUP2-ADV) Examination Guide Version 1.0, Section 4.1

This configuration management strategy is likely to be most successful because it allows the engineers to work on the system model collaboratively and concurrently, while maintaining configuration control and avoiding conflicts. A configuration management tool is a software tool that helps manage changes to model elements and track their versions and history. A package is a grouping mechanism that can contain any kind of model element, such as diagrams, blocks, activities, etc. By using a configuration management tool, the engineers can check out packages for editing, which locks the elements in that package and prevents other users from modifying them. The engineers can also view packages in read-only mode by any user at any time, which allows them to see the latest version of the model without affecting it. The engineers can also receive alerts when a package they are viewing has been modified and checked-in by another user, and see the changes highlighted. This way, the engineers can stay informed and synchronized with the model updates. By not allowing packages to remain checked out overnight, the engineers can avoid holding up the work of other users who need toaccess or modify those packages. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://sysml.org/tutorials/sysml-diagram-tutorial/